Sentences with phrase «court places your child»

If the court places your child with you, will he spend a lot of time in daycare?

Accordingly, the court placed the children with the father with family maintenance services.

Not exact matches

A proactive estate strategy will place you — not state law or courts — in control of decisions about the care of your children, your assets and your health care.

Even considering this, only slightly more than half of Americans have a will or trust in place, leaving control of their minor children and their assets to state law and the courts.1

After March 4, 2013, an International Arrest Warrant will be issued against these Defendants.The guilty verdict followed nearly a month of deliberations by more than thirty sworn Citizen Jurors of the 150 case exhibits produced by Court Prosecutors, The Court's judgement declares the wealth and property of the churches responsible for the Canadian genocide to be forfeited and placed under public ownership, as reparations for the families of the more than 50,000 children who died in the residential schools.To enforce its sentence, the Court has empowered citizens in Canada, the United States, England, Italy and a dozen other nations to act as its legal agents armed with warrants, and peacefully occupy and seize properties of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, which are the main agents in the deaths of these children

The Air Force confirmed on Tuesday that Kelley had been treated in the facility after he was placed under pretrial confinement stemming from a court - martial on charges that he assaulted his then - wife and hit her child hard enough to fracture the boy's skull.

The complainant had been in the process of assessing the grandmother, and, when those assessments were complete, it applied to the court for the child to be placed with her.

If an Alabama court determines that domestic violence has occurred, the court will presume that it is not in the best interests of the child to be placed in the sole custody or joint legal or physical custody of the person accused of domestic or family violence.

«Frankly, I don't think there was ever any evidence that it was in the best interest of the child to be taken from his home» in the first place, Rietz said in court.

A Nebraska court will place a child in a joint or shared custody arrangement if both parents agree to the arrangement.

In other words, the court places a higher priority on what's best for your child than what either you or your ex want or would prefer.

Often when there is a child custody order in place, or even when a custody hearing is pending, one parent may fear that the other parent will attempt to circumvent the court and remove the child without consent, or fail to return the child following a routine visit.

Researching the sport your child is playing will give you a better idea of the action taking place on the field, court or rink.

It should also be noted that, in a docketed report to trial court, the attorney for the children stated a cautious preference for placing the custody of the children with Robert.

The court will also intervene and change an order that's less than two years old if the custodial parent has placed the child with a de facto custodian — he's living with someone other than him or the child's other parent.

Hanging in a child's bed room or play room, this royal canopy tent is the perfect place for little knights and princesses to hold court.

The federal government has run out of space to house the children; many who arrive in New York — second only to Texas in the number of children arriving, Ms. James said — are placed in the care of relatives pending court appearances, but others end up in the custody of Homeless Services.

As the federal government seeks a place to shelter children detained at the border as they await appearances in immigration court, some have been brought to New York to be placed in the care of relatives or sponsors here, according to The New York Times.

A bitter note, imbued with an almost Loachian note of real - world outrage, comes when the official heading Khaled's asylum hearing announces that the court deems Aleppo an insufficiently dangerous place to warrant him staying in Finland; immediately afterwards, a TV news program shows coverage of the bombing of a children's hospital there.

That law has four key provisions: 1) every child, no matter how disabled, has a right to a free and appropriate education, which can take place in either a public or private setting; 2) an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) must be designed for each child in consultation with his or her parents; 3) the child should be educated in the «least restrictive environment»; and 4) parents can object to the educational provisions for their child by requesting a «due process» hearing with an independent hearing officer, whose decisions can be appealed to the courts (see sidebar).

In a similar vein, the schools are mandated to educate children who have been removed from their homes by the courts and placed in group homes within our zone.

This all took place right after the Wisconsin Supreme Court had passed a ruling allowing low - income children in Milwaukee to utilize a state voucher to pay for their tuition to attend any school of their choice, including faith - based schools.

For the Earned Income Credit, a foster child is defined as an individual who is placed with you by an authorized placement agency or court order.

A foster child is any child placed with you by an authorized placement agency or by judgment, decree, or other order of any court of competent jurisdiction.

Since his three children were under the age of six, their portion of the inheritance was placed into a trust that was administered by the court until they turned 18.

Through our Courthouse Facility Dogs program, we place dogs in criminal justice settings where they help to foster a safer and more comfortable environment for children who must provide depositions and give testimony in court.

courts should have no place in mandating that behavioral problems in children be treated with drugs.

Re A (a Minor)[2007] EWCA Civ 1383 and [2007] All ER (D) 376 (Dec) the court held that when considering whether or not to grant such leave, the welfare of the child is a relevant consideration but not paramount, but before the permission discretion can be triggered, the «change in circumstances» must be sufficient to «have a real prospect of success» of reversing the court approved care plan already in place.

Children may be placed outside those preferences only if a court finds good cause to deviate.

If children are going to foster care or adoption, ICWA requires that courts try to place them first with a relative, then another member of their tribe, then another Indian home and finally, in the case of foster care, a tribally approved institution.

Currently, the EU provides a mechanism which proscribes which country's jurisdiction takes precedence when there are two hearings taking place simultaneously in different countries; it enables court orders for maintenance, child contact or injunctions to be enforced in all member states; it enables information to be shared between nations so a partner can be located across borders; and it ensures cooperation between member states in cases of child abduction overseas.

The Court's decision is astonishing for its failure to criticize the mother's conduct in abducting the child in the first place and for its failure to address the fact that the Article 13 (b) exception should not be invoked when the abducting parent is the one who creates the risk by refusing to return with the child.

The appeals court in the Gove case held that a parent places their physical, mental, and psychological condition before the court when they participate in a child custody case as a result of the legislature specifically including the parties» mental and physical health as an issue the court is required to consider.

Determining the child's habitual residence is a threshold issue in any Hague Abduction Convention case, and if the court determines that the country from which the child was removed was not his or her place of habitual residence, the Convention will not apply and the petition should be dismissed.

In a December 3, 2012 merits removal order, the family court found Mother placed Child at a substantial risk of harm of physical neglect and returning Child to Mother's home would place Child at an unreasonable risk of harm.

Both attorneys have obviously entered into a secret pact — complete with hats, handshakes and cryptic words — to draft their pleadings entirely in crayon on the back sides of gravy - stained paper place mats, in the hope that the Court would be so charmed by their child - like efforts that their utter dearth of legal authorities in their briefing would go unnoticed.

On awarding damages at trial, unless the damages are very small and it is appropriate to order them to go to the litigation friend to be put into a building society account (or similar) for the child, the trial judge will direct payment into court with the placing of the damages in the special investment account until further investment directions have been given.

A new application form The C100 is being introduced for orders under the Children Act 1989 s 8 in place of the C1 which includes new questions about the use of mediation before going to court and is more user friendly with simplifi ed language and additional direct questions and «tick box» responses.

The judge, Lyris Younge of Philadelphia Family Court, abused her discretion when she refused to place the child known as N.M. in the care of a grandmother, according to the May 4 decision by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

As the Supreme Court stated in Baker at para. 71, numerous international instruments have «placed special importance on protections for children and childhood».

The child was born in England, made a ward of court, removed from the mother at birth by consent, named by the local authority and placed with foster carers.

The article notes a recent Supreme Court case, Board of Education v. Tom F. that let stand a decision permitting a wealthy parent to obtain reimbursement for private school education under federal law, even where the parent did not give the public school an opportunity to address the child's needs and immediately places the child in private school.

With respect to issues concerning custody and guardianship of the children requiring change, from the standpoint of children ¡ ¯ s welfare, it is appropriate to authorize adjudicative jurisdiction to a court having jurisdiction over the abiding place or the habitual residence of the children.

The family court, placing great weight on the opinion of the family counselor and a clinical psychologist, authorized the Youngbloods to adopt the Child, concluding:

Because the courts place a high premium on the non-custodial parent's relationship with the child, many states require permission of the parent or the court before the custodial parent can make a move.

In the end, the judge ruled that the children should be made temporary wards of the court and placed in the interim care of relatives who reside in Florida.

In a child custody proceeding, each party must give information under oath in the first court document filed, or in an attached affidavit, as to the child's present location, all places where the child has lived during the last five years and the names and addresses of the persons with whom the child has lived during that period.

In effect, she accepted the submission of the local authority, recorded at paragraph 34 above, that the decision in relation to whether the child should be placed in the care of the grandmother was not a question for the court.

A child placed by a court under the care of a guardian.

We have primary legislation in place: Crime and Courts Act 2013, Sch 10 brings in the family court, and the Children and Families Act 2014 has royal assent (13 March 2014).