Sentences with phrase «court presents changing»

In addition, an outdoor sculpture court presents changing solo shows each year.

Not exact matches

«In light of the unforeseeable changes in established first amendment law set forth in recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&rCourt,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&rcourt said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.»

[Note: Because every person's situation is different, and because the law frequently changes, is not clearly established, or is interpreted in different ways by different courts, you should not rely on the information presented herein for legal advice about your specific situation.

Such was the case with Queen Victoria, although things probably changed in the 20th Century with the births of Princesses Elizabeth and Margaret Rose - although, all of the court and family were no doubt present for the baptisms.

Park district officials had courted the tax group's endorsement by presenting plans for the change at two of the group's meetings, park board President Tom Drake said.

A court in Kentucky will not change a child custody order that's less than two years old unless the parent requesting the change can prove that the child's present environment may seriously endanger his physical, mental, moral or emotional well - being.

The report itself acknowledges that access to justice is likely to be impaired if the small claims limit is changed significantly, particularly for people who do not feel confident to represent themselves or lack the tools to present a case in court.

Justice Abba Aji in his judgment said, since, evidences and exhibits presented before the court have shown that the elections in the said polling were marred with irregularities and the number of registered voters from the affected polling units if they were not disenfranchised can change the outcome of the election, the right thing to do is to have a fresh election in the polling units.

Friday January 15th 2010 — Again the court is changed and the residing magistrate claims the case can not commence although again the witness, statements and relevant people are present.

Michael Gerrard, director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University, says it's important to remember that, at present, the CPP is not in effect, since the U.S. Supreme Court stayed implementation of the rule in February of this year.

The success of a climate - based Charter challenge will depend on a number of factors, including who would bring the case, what government conduct would be challenged and whether the courts would accept the causal link between the present and future harms of climate change and the government's management of GHG emissions.

This presents some risk in that courts may hesitate to «stretch» privileges beyond the strict confines set by the legislature, but it also presents an opportunity to change the law without putting anyone's clients at risk.

The Standing Committee is to: (i) receive, review and evaluate the reports from the circuit pro bono committees; (ii) submit to The Florida Bar, the Florida Bar Foundation and the Supreme Court of Florida a report after the annual Florida Bar member reports have been received and analyzed; (iii) present to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar and to the Supreme Court of Florida any suggested changes or modifications to the pro bono plan.

This requirement can be satisfied either by adducing direct evidence or by asking the court to draw an inference based on, notably, whether the link was user - activated or automatic; whether it was a deep or a shallow link; whether the page contained more than one hyperlink and, if so, where the impugned link was located in relation to others; the context in which the link was presented to users; the number of hits on the page containing the hyperlink; the number of hits on the page containing the linked information (both before and after the page containing the link was posted); whether access to the Web sites in question was general or restricted; whether changes were made to the linked information and, if so, how they correlate with the number of hits on the page containing that information; and evidence concerning the behaviour of Internet users.

Reversing the decision of the Court of Appeal and restoring the determination of the trial judge (upheld in the High Court on appeal) the Supreme Court concluded that the facts in the present case did give rise to an inference that the intentions of the parties (to own the property in equal beneficial shares, consistent with their legal ownership) did change when Mr Kernott acquired his own property independently of Ms Jones.

The law was to change on 12 October 1984 to its present state under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25 (as amended) to require the court to have regard to «the conduct of the parties, if that conduct is such that it would in the opinion of the court be in inequitable to disregard it».

During such a hearing, the parent may present evidence that the court does not have complete information regarding income or that there is a change in circumstances causing an inability to pay child support.

At present, it is not uncommon for parties, both in the UK and overseas, to stipulate contractually that UK courts will have jurisdiction over any disputes which arise and there is no reason for this to change following Brexit.

In a comment made in a speech on the eve of the 2017 General Election and less than a week after the London Bridge attack, she vowed to beef up counter-terror powers by restricting «the freedom and the movements of terrorist suspects when we have enough evidence to know they present a threat, but not enough evidence to prosecute them in full in court... And if human rights laws stop us from doing it, we will change those laws so we can do it.»

The appeals court did note that if a court faces an emergency situation it may make a temporary change of custody before a hearing is held or before the other parent is notified, but because this was not the case in this situation the court was required to provide mother notice and an opportunity to present evidence before changing the child custody orders.

In contrast, the present appeal decision provides an example of Parliament increasing sentences and the Court being responsive to those legislative changes.

Press Release NEW EDITION May 2013 Insolvency and Restructuring Manual, Second Edition Simon Beale Revised edition of practical insolvency handbook includes coverage of highly anticipated Supreme Court judgment in Eurosail With the global financial crisis maintaining its firm grip upon the economy, Bloomsbury Professional is pleased to present a unified manual which incorporates the changes to the insolvency landscape over...

In confirming the decision of the Motions Judge, the Court of Appeal described the test from Sagaz as a dual inquiry as to whether the new evidence, if presented at trial, would probably have changed the result, and whether the evidence could have been obtained before trial by the exercise of reasonable diligence.

This is partly because neither the Commission, when it was still in existence, nor the Court in its present incarnation, have attempted any comprehensive definition of Article 8 interests, adapting them to meet changing times.

Since 2000, Micah has presented the Pennsylvania Bar Association's annual marketing ethics program (as part of its three times per year «Ethics Potpourri» programming in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh), changing the focus each year to address ethics topics that have included an analysis of U.S. Supreme Court cases, advertising ethics opinions across the country, lawyer rankings and ratings, use of social media, blogs, traditional marketing approaches and missteps, internet marketing, solicitation, multi-jurisdictional practices, and state - by - state advertising requirements as they relate to everything from pre-approvals, language limitations, disciplinary actions, and the myriad of ways a law firm can (often unknowingly) violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.

The Supreme Court noted this change in deciding Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa, where it held that «[i] n order to obtain [a mixed motive instruction under Title VII], a plaintiff need only present sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude, by a preponderance of the evidence, that «[protected class] was a motivating factor for any employment practice.

Alexandra Huneeus presented her co-authored article, «How International Courts are Changing Peace,» at the University of Minnesota Law School International Law Workshop and at the Vanderbilt Law School Legal Studies Program Roundtbale.

The court is guided by the best interests of the child, and considers: the relationship of the child with each parent and the ability and disposition of each parent to provide the child with love, affection and guidance, the ability and disposition of each parent to assure that the child receives adequate food, clothing, medical care, other material needs and a safe environment, the ability and disposition of each parent to meet the child's present and future developmental needs, the quality of the child's adjustment to the child's present housing, school and community and the potential effect of any change, the ability and disposition of each parent to foster a positive relationship and frequent and continuing contact with the other parent, including physical contact, except where contact will result in harm to the child or to a parent, the quality of the child's relationship with the primary care provider, if appropriate given the child's age and development, the relationship of the child with any other person who may significantly affect the child, the ability and disposition of the parents to communicate, cooperate with each other and make joint decisions concerning the children where parental rights and responsibilities are to be shared or divided, and any evidence of abuse.

The Kramer Law Firm will gather and prepare the financial documentation and records essential in Florida child support modification, and present your case to the court in the best possible way to ensure that you obtain the necessary changes.

If your ex-spouse does not want to modify the custody order, you will have to go to court and present evidence to meet your burden to prove that the change in custody is required.

Changes to court orders, after your divorce is final and then circumstances change financially or for other reasons, you will usually be required to present modified documents to the court for a judge to sign.

The court will schedule a hearing, during which you may present evidence as to why the order should be changed.

As with all modifications in Kansas, parties seeking to modify child support must submit a motion to the court and list specific facts as to why the court should change the monthly payment amount; parents who can not agree to a modified amount must attend a hearing on the issue and present evidence as to why the support amount should, or should not, be changed.

«While the most factually apparent ground to change existing custody arrangements involves physical danger, the act of alienating a child against a parent presents a nefarious form of conduct that must be met with careful consideration and immediate, comprehensive remediation by a Court....

The court... noted that Pelzer concluded there were many indicators of the sexual - allegations - in - divorce syndrome and the parental - alienation syndrome present and recommended a change in custody....

The name change also acknowledges that the Court's present jurisdiction is similar to jurisdiction exercised by the State District Courts, rather than at Magistrate level.

With his usual flair for presenting complex data in a form all can grasp and understand, Joe Sorge quickly made the case for how home and work life in the United States have changed dramatically yet our family laws and our family law courts and child support guidelines have remained stuck in the past.

If either parent wants a change, they either must get the other parent to agree, or present their case to the courts.

When a request is made to change some conditions to a set contract - this present opportunity and the ball is in your court - settle in 2 or the contract is cancelled - Are you open to share why you may be nervous other seasoned investors may be able to shed some light on your situation