Sentences with phrase «court process such»

Some solutions proposed are: rationing of judicial time for example by assigning a fixed number of motions to each proceeding; charging higher filing fees for additional motions; penalizing obstructionist conduct through multiples of indemnification costs; awarding priority dates to well - run litigation; more motions in writing; higher filing costs for longer hearings; more aggressive use by the Bench of rules that permit judges to control the court process such as time limits for evidence in chief and cross, and some outsourcing of judicative functions.

That said, family lawyers are increasingly looking at ways to manage and reduce costs for family clients, including fixed fees for procedural steps instead of hourly rates and directing clients to methods of resolving disputes outside of the overburdened court process such as mediation, collaborative law and arbitration.»

Not exact matches

We also don't provide the government with direct or «back - door» access to data — they have to submit a request and they must have legal process (such as a subpoena, court order or search warrant) to do it.

Law enforcement officials who believe that notification would jeopardize an investigation should obtain an appropriate court order or other valid legal process that specifically precludes Member notification, such as an order issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2705 (b).

As such, the public's confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court's ability to hold the government to the highest standard, particularly as it relates to surveillance of American citizens.

She is in the process of trying to get this through some courts and getting such sites banned.

Shall the Missouri Constiitution be amended to define the term «person» to be from the beginning of biological development and grant such person constiitutional rights and access to courts under the equal protection, due process, and open courts provisions of the Missouri Constiitution?

The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed a brief in both marriage cases now pending in the Supreme Court, arguing that the Court should not interfere with democratic legislative processes in this field, because only such processes can result in public policies that will prevent church - state conflict in the future.

Such an amendment would return to the political process a prerogative that the U.S. Supreme Court has in recent years pre-empted: the right of the people and their elected representatives to determine, and to take practical steps to foster, those kinds of education that seem beneficial to the general welfare.

The Court gave examples of such legislative violations of due process of law: «Acts of attainder, bills of pains and penalties, acts of confiscation, acts reversing judgments and acts directly transferring one man's estate to another, legislative judgments and decrees, and other similar special, partial, and arbitrary exertions of power under the forms of legislation.»

Wyoming Whiskey's performance of this agreement is subject to existing laws and legal process, and nothing contained in this agreement is in derogation of Wyoming Whiskey's right to comply with governmental, court and law enforcement requests or requirements relating to your use of the Site or information provided to or gathered by Wyoming Whiskey with respect to such use.

Your name, physical address and telephone number, and a statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which your physical address is located, or if your physical address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which BEAM SUNTORY may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification of allegedly infringing material or an agent of such person.

There will be lots of court dates and visitations and ups and downs and, well, we don't even know exactly because this is such a different process from last time.

Challenge Success's performance of this agreement is subject to existing laws and legal process, and nothing contained in this agreement is in derogation of Challenge Success's right to comply with governmental, court and law enforcement requests or requirements relating to your use of the Challenge Success Web Site or information provided to or gathered by Challenge Success with respect to such use.

Though we make every effort to preserve user privacy, we may need to disclose personal information when required by law wherein we have a good - faith belief that such action is necessary to comply with a current judicial proceeding, a court order or legal process served on our Web site.

UPDATE: Last week, Gillibrand issued a statement applauding legislation that would authorize U.S. Supreme Court proceedings to be televised, unless decided by a majority vote that such coverage would violate the due process rights of any party involved, explaining:

As there was such amendment explicitly guaranteeing equal protection for the federal government, the courts ruled that due process necessitated equal treatment.

He also routinely vetoes legislation to let various groups of local security guards such as employees of Port Chester's village court and the Jacob K. Javits Convention Center be considered «peace officers» and have some powers akin to police officers; he's argued this status should not be granted piecemeal, but as part of a «comprehensive, State - wide, process.»

Cuomo has repeatedly promised that he would veto whatever lines the task force comes up with, likely triggering court involvement in the process to ensure that new lines are organized in time for the 2012 primary in New York, even as he warned that such a move would cause chaos.

The court added that the powers of INEC to conduct a recall process was given by the Constitution and such the could not be taken away even by the court.

Such processes could be patented, and the court ruled that the program for regulating the process was also patentable.

Countries favorable to growing transgenic crops, such as Spain and the United Kingdom, want to unlock approval processes that have been delayed for years and allow more crops onto European fields; the governments of countries like Germany, France, and Austria want to be able to ban products on their territory — even if EFSA deems them safe — without being challenged in court.

Processes and products that involve such cells are not patentable in the European Union, according to a ruling today from the Court of Justice of the E.U..

So far, the climate science used in courts has focused mostly on overall trends and gradual processes such as sea level rise, said Michael Burger, executive director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School in New York, who said he has no financial stake in climate change litigation.

Madhava Honey, Ltd. dba Madhava Natural Sweeteners's performance of this agreement is subject to existing laws and legal process, and nothing contained in this agreement is in derogation of Madhava Honey, Ltd. dba Madhava Natural Sweeteners's right to comply with governmental, court and law enforcement requests or requirements relating to your use of the Site or information provided to or gathered by Madhava Honey, Ltd. dba Madhava Natural Sweeteners with respect to such use.

Law enforcement officials may send legal process (such as subpoenas, court orders, search warrants and related correspondence) to the Company via facsimile at [phone].

We will disclose personal information about our members if and when is required by law and if such an action is necessary to comply with a current judicial proceeding, a court order or legal process served on our Website.

We may disclose information about our users, including contact information, to respond to subpoenas, court orders, legal process, and other law enforcement measures, and to comply with other legal obligations, such as FCC requirements, in our sole judgment.

- The subscriberâ $ ™ s name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if your address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which FilmOn.com may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification under subsection (c)(1)(C) or an agent of such person.

Federal courts typically refuse to create new substantive rights, and in a 1989 case, DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, the Supreme Court «recognized that the [Constitution's] Due Process Clauses generally confer no affirmative right to governmental aid, even where such aid may be necessary to secure life, liberty, or property interests.»

The issue in Memphis Community Schools v. Stachura (Case No. 85 - 410) is how courts should compensate individuals whose «substantive» constitutional rights, such as free expression — as opposed to their 14th Amendment due - process rights — have been violated.

We see it in important initiatives such as iCivics, where Supreme Court Justice Emeritus Sandra Day O'Connor has led a national movement to use gaming to teach civics, and the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, where simulations are demonstrating how role - playing games can bring the legislative process to life for kids.

Nebraska School Nurses Association's performance of this agreement is subject to existing laws and legal process, and nothing contained in this agreement is in derogation of Nebraska School Nurses Association's right to comply with governmental, court and law enforcement requests or requirements relating to your use of the Nebraska School Nurses Association Web Site or information provided to or gathered by Nebraska School Nurses Association with respect to such use.

However, Molina describes the move as perfectly normal: «The court had ordered that parties partake in such a process if necessary to reach agreement.»

«(d) CONFIDENTIALITY PROVISIONS - Until such time as rules are adopted under chapter 131 of this title providing for the confidentiality of alternative dispute resolution processes under this chapter, each district court shall, by local rule adopted under section 2071 (a), provide for the confidentiality of the alternative dispute resolution processes and to prohibit disclosure of confidential dispute resolution communications.».

For those who might not know, a recap: Adobe Digital Editions is widely used software in the ebook trade for both library and commercial ebook transactions to authenticate legitimate library users, apply DRM to encrypt ebook files, and in general facilitate the ebook circulation process — such as deleting an ebook from a device after the loan... Continue reading After Privacy Glitch, the Ball Is Now in Our Court →

For our everyday business purposes such as to process your transactions, maintain your accounts, respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus

For our everyday business purposes - such as to process your transactions, maintain your account (s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus

For our everyday business purposes — such as to process your transactions, maintain your account (s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus

N. Disclosure of Account Information We may disclose information about you or your transactions for our everyday business purposes, such as to process your transactions, maintain your account (s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus.

Healthy Paws» performance of this agreement is subject to existing laws and legal process, and nothing contained in this agreement is in derogation of Healthy Paws» right to comply with governmental, court and law enforcement requests or requirements relating to your use of the Healthy PawsWeb Site or information provided to or gathered by Healthy Paws with respect to such use.

Gateway Miniature Schnauzer Club's performance of this agreement is subject to existing laws and legal process, and nothing contained in this agreement is in derogation of Gateway Miniature Schnauzer Club's right to comply with governmental, court and law enforcement requests or requirements relating to your use of the Gateway Miniature Schnauzer Club Web Site or information provided to or gathered by Gateway Miniature Schnauzer Club with respect to such use.

Mount Washington Alpine Resort's performance of this agreement is subject to existing laws and legal process, and nothing contained in this agreement is in derogation of Mount Washington Alpine Resort's right to comply with governmental, court and law enforcement requests or requirements relating to your use of the Mount Washington Alpine Resort Web Site or information provided to or gathered by Mount Washington Alpine Resort with respect to such use.

(a) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on your behalf; (b) a description of the material that has been removed or to which access has been disabled and where the material was located online before it was removed or access to it was disabled; (c) a written statement by you that under penalty of perjury, that you have a good faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled; and (d) your address, telephone number, and email address; and (e) a statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of federal district court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if your address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which the service provider may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification under DMCA 512 subsection (c)(1)(c) or an agent of such person.

Jackson's process for these works originated in the study of transcripts from historic American Civil Rights court cases, such as Brown vs. the Board of Education, alongside works and writing by mid-century abstractionists such as Josef Albers and Barnett Newman.

Disclosure of Personal Information The Pace Gallery may disclose your personal information to unaffiliated third parties if we believe in good faith that such disclosure is necessary (a) to comply with the law or in response to a subpoena, court order, government request, or other legal process; (b) to protect the interests, rights, safety, or property of The Pace Gallery or others; (c) to enforce any terms of service on the Web Site; (d) to provide you with the service requested by you (including allowing a purchaser of a Pace Gallery division, or Pace Gallery as a whole, to continue to serve you), and to perform other activities related to such services; or (e) to operate The Pace Gallery's systems properly.

your name, address and telephone number, and a statement that (i) you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal district court for the judicial district in which such address is located or, if your address is outside of the United States, to any judicial district in which Climate Central may be found, and (ii) you will accept service of process from the claimant who provided Climate Central's designated agent with notification of the alleged infringement in accordance with the DMCA, or an agent of such person.

So premise of such study would be the fact that that government would waving these environmental laws and also be looking a way to streamline governmental approval, so that it's the actual construction time which is the limiting factor and not the court cases, approval process which adding all the time to building nuclear power plants.

We may also share your personally identifiable information to respond to law enforcement requests, court orders, or other legal processes; or if we believe that such disclosure is necessary to investigate, prevent, or respond to illegal activities, fraud, physical threats to you or others; or as otherwise required by any applicable law or regulation.

To interpret Rottmann to trump this would require a judgment even more grandiose than Van Gend or Costa, something in which the Court pronounced that the present state of integration was such that the removal of their fundamental status and rights from a group of Union citizens could only be permitted if the national constitutional process leading to it was itself sufficiently democratic to comply with the requirements of EU law.