Sentences with phrase «court processes involved»

The court processes involved can become expensive and create delays.

In order to determine whether you may be able to appeal orders in your family law case, you need the advice of a knowledgeable Tampa family lawyer who is familiar with these types of cases and the court process involved.

Not exact matches

Deporting green card holders is possible, though the process can involve lengthy court proceedings.

As for Oregon's foreclosure laws, the state uses both judicial (judge and lawsuit involved) and non-judicial (no court involvement) processes.

«Upon learning that we were in possession of records involving [Cruz] as an adult, DCF immediately started the process to ask a court to allow the release of all records in the spirit of full transparency,» a DCF spokeswoman, Jessica Sims, said in a short statement.

«The IRS offers no explanation as to how the IRS can legitimately use most of these millions of records on hundreds of thousands of users; instead, it claims that as long as it has submitted a declaration from an IRS agent that the IRS «is conducting an investigation to determine the identity and correct federal income tax liabilities of United States persons who conducted transactions in a virtual currency during 2013 - 2015» the Court must find that the Summons does not involve an abuse of process.

Non-judicial foreclosures are generally faster and easier for lenders to execute than the judicial process, which involves a court, along with lawsuits and appeals in some cases.

Even If the due - process provision calls on the court to protect rights recognized by tradition or widespread consensus, there is a problem with Roe: it involved neither Antiabortion laws were decades old, and although a few states had partly decriminalized abortion, Roe went much further and struck down laws in virtually every state.

The application is the first step in a process that could last up to six months, and involve court hearings, expert witnesses and submissions from rival bidders and industry players.

So regardless if children are on the soccer field, basketball court or involved in any of the 10 team sports offered at the base they're assured of having a positive experience, and learning sports skills in the process.

«Resources for Divorced Parents» (1-800-640-3405), a nonprofit Maine corporation committed to reducing the negative effects of divorce offers «Kids First: Parenting Through Divorce,» a four - hour educational program for parents who are involved in a court case involving rights and responsibilities of their minor children, and «The Next Step,» a six - week group program for divorcing parents who want to «learn healthy, effective ways to parent children, to resolve conflicts and empower themselves during and after the divorce process.»

Getting the police involved and pressing charges for violent or destructive behavior is a slow process before the child gets to court.

UPDATE: Last week, Gillibrand issued a statement applauding legislation that would authorize U.S. Supreme Court proceedings to be televised, unless decided by a majority vote that such coverage would violate the due process rights of any party involved, explaining:

He has also made multiple populist claims, that would be inconstitutional for any president to perform, for example pledging that if any member of congress was involved in corruption, he would personaly take them to jail, showing little for any due process, and ignoring the fact that members of congress have political - immunity that can only be withdrawn by the Supreme Court.

I wished that the Chief Justice under this circumstances in my candid opinion could speak to the two members of parliament involved directly with signs of remorse especially when the merit of the case is NOT determined so that they can feel comfortable appearing before her in court otherwise this may NEGATIVELY affect the morale and confidence and trust of the two MPs in the process especially in the CJ going forward and it may lead to a discontinuation of the case since it's only dismissed on technical grounds but not on its merits.

Robert McDonnell, who had vigorously asserted his innocence, said in his statement that he appreciated the Justice Department «applying the correct rule of law articulated by the Supreme Court» and «for doing justice for me, my family, my friends, my Commonwealth and its servants, and for all those involved in the democratic process.»

Firstly, that this case in its entirety was an abuse of process, or, secondly, that if it wasn't, it should be heard before the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), which is a special court set up to hear cases involving issues concerning official surveillance.

«The court found Mr. Brodsky's challenges to past NRC decisions regarding exemption requests to be «generally without merit,» but the court took issue with the NRC's process and the extent to which that process involved public participation.

Those talking about breach of the due process (because the matter involving the deportees is still before the court) can bite off their tongues and spew them out — for all I care!!

«I'm sure the courts will be involved in this process,» Cuomo said in a news conference before the legislative lines were released.

On Tuesday (Feb. 28), Faso released a statement applauding President Trump's executive order that day, saying, «Before it was correctly paused by the courts, WOTUS would have required local farmers to apply for federal permits for routine work involving drainage ditches or dry streambeds on their property, a costly and time - consuming process for a seasonal enterprise.»

«If the courts get involved in elections when people go over the top on policy and sometimes tell lies then we are going to have a very strange electoral process in future,» he said.

Processes and products that involve such cells are not patentable in the European Union, according to a ruling today from the Court of Justice of the E.U..

That court referred the case to the European Court of Justice, asking it to decide several questions, including what the E.U. law means when it refers to «human embryos,» and whether the ban also covers patents that don't involve embryos directly but where the use of embryos «is a necessary precondition» for the covered process or procourt referred the case to the European Court of Justice, asking it to decide several questions, including what the E.U. law means when it refers to «human embryos,» and whether the ban also covers patents that don't involve embryos directly but where the use of embryos «is a necessary precondition» for the covered process or proCourt of Justice, asking it to decide several questions, including what the E.U. law means when it refers to «human embryos,» and whether the ban also covers patents that don't involve embryos directly but where the use of embryos «is a necessary precondition» for the covered process or product.

then we wait for the courts to process the paper (Where I live you need to be separated a year before you can file for a divorce, unless there is adultery / abuse involved)

In ruling on the due - process question, the appeals court overturned a district court's decision to dismiss the case, which involved a San Antonio science teacher's claim that he was «constructively discharged «3from his position without a hearing prior to his dismissal.

Instead, the department is claiming «a deliberative process privilege» cited in two court rulings that have nothing to do with education issues, but involve legal battles over what records should be available to the Louisiana Legislative Auditor's Office.

In California, a district must go through a process that involves 10 different steps — including appeals before a three - person panel of the state's Professional Competence commission that is largely slated in favor of NEA and AFT, and state courts — until a dismissal is either finalized or tossed out.

Policies and Procedures E606: An Overview of the ADA, IDEA and Section 504: Update 2001 E576: An Overview of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (P.L. 105 - 17): Update 1999 E600: Creating Useful Individualized Educational Programs (IEPs)(2000) E598: Designing Individualized Education Program (IEP) Transition Plans (2000) E560: IDEA's Definition of Disabilities (1998) E611: Involving Parents in the IEP Process (2001) E578: New IDEA Requirements: Factors to Consider in Developing an IEP (1999) E575: Rights and Responsibilities of Parents of Children with Disabilities (1999) E629: The Least Restrictive Environment Mandate: How Has It Been Defined by the Courts?

In the process of completing his research for his manuscript, McMillan came upon a terrible realization: the people involved in the arrest and the court proceedings were aging and in some cases, dying.

The author, Rev. Tom Pedigo, calls this model «The Temple Pattern» which involves a simple threefold process of musically moving from the Outer Court (celebration and jubilation) to the Inner Court (reflection and expectation) and into the Holy of Holies (adoration and spiritual communion).

Declaring bankruptcy involves going to court and the whole process will cost around # 700, more if you use the services of a solicitor, which can be helpful but is not necessary.

Borrowers will never receive loan proceeds equal to 100 % of the collateral's value, because even the most liquid assets can only be seized and sold through a court process that involves delay and expense.

Bankruptcy law defines the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved in the bankruptcy process — the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, the official receivers, the bankruptcy court, licensed bankruptcy trustees, the creditors and the debtor.

Otherwise, if you're involved in a bankruptcy process, that money could be seized by a court representative to pay your debts.

The opt - out process involves the Court making orders that notice must be given to group members of the right to opt out of the class action before a specified date.

I'm not a lawyer but have been involved in court discovery processes and in records - management.

Stage 0 encourages the parties to view the court process as a last resort and provides free sources of legal advice and information, while stage 0.5 involves a short exchange between the parties to ascertain whether there is actually a legal dispute.

In its decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal noted the trial judge «made many errors» stating the original interpretation did not take into consideration that a two - step process involving consultation by both the province and the federal government is unnecessary, as the treaty right is protected.

The Court recurrently emphasises the notion that ensuring transparency in the decision - making process necessarily involves review by the public.

The best way to involve children in the process is through using alternatives to court, such as mediation.

The first was classes on the subject of pleading, which at the time was a much more intricate and involved process than today.17 However, the main place that these schools taught legal writing skills during this time period was in what were called «moot courts.»

After a protracted arbitration process and final hearing — which involved two separate state court appeals — the Arbitrator, a former Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court, ruled in favor of the health system respondents on liability, and awarded no damages to the physician - limited partner on any of his arbitration clcourt appeals — the Arbitrator, a former Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court, ruled in favor of the health system respondents on liability, and awarded no damages to the physician - limited partner on any of his arbitration clCourt, ruled in favor of the health system respondents on liability, and awarded no damages to the physician - limited partner on any of his arbitration claims.

It can involve initial meetings or calls with clients to discuss a case and its prospects, drafting pleadings, considering prior art (earlier publications that can be used to invalidate a patent), reviewing documents to determine whether they are relevant and need to be disclosed, preparing a product or process description with the client (which involves drafting a detailed description of the product or process that is alleged to be infringing), meetings with experts, conferences with counsel to discuss and prepare the case for trial, and obviously days in court.

The process is long and complex and often involves other parties who are familiar with the civil court system.

The courts are not involved in the nitty - gritty details of the mediation process.

Many cases involve a similar court process with the filing of initial paperwork, such as a petition or complaint, and hearings.

We understand how injury victims may not want to go to court or get involved in a drawn - out legal process.

However, if the custodial parent wants to move across the country because he or she has a job lined up, family in the area, can show what school the child will attend in the area, and can demonstrate how the non-custodial parent will still be involved in the decision making process and still have visitation, the court may allow the custodial parent and the child to leave the state.

Mediation and collaborative law are much less formal than the court process and therefore makes the parties involved in the conflict feel more comfortable.