If the accused appears at the required court hearings,
the court refunds the money to the person or company who provided the bail.
Not exact matches
Following delays in retrieving the
money, Supreme
Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the
court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to
refund the cash to the state.
The Ghana Supreme
Court later ruled that there was no contract between Woyome and Ghana therefore ordered that he should
refund the
money.
«I say with all the strength at my disposal that a cheque drawn by Woyome in favour of the Economic and Organized Crime Office, which was not a party to the action or the judgment creditor, can not be a cheque in part payment of the unconstitutional
monies ordered by the
Court to be
refunded to the Republic.
The people of Ghana should demand to know from Government how its Attorney General can — in enforcing the order of the Supreme
Court for Woyome to
refund the unconstitutional payments made to Woyome to the Republic of Ghana — accept a cheque of GHC4, 000,000.00 drawn by Woyome dated 4th November 2016 in favour of the Economic and Organized Crime Office as part payment of the
monies ordered by the
Court to be
refunded.
The Supreme
Court in 2014 ordered Mr. Woyome to pay back the money as Supreme Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
Court in 2014 ordered Mr. Woyome to pay back the
money as Supreme
Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the
court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to
refund the cash to the state.
He told the
court that he was expecting the
money from the Northern Regional Minister, Mr Salifu Sa - eed whom he claimed he spent the
money with but the Minister is yet to assist him to
refund the
money to his employer.
For Mr. Nortey has clearly become a nuisance who could also be legitimately sued in
court for a full
refund of whatever
moneys may have been invested in organizing the parliamentary primary rerun by both the NPP and the Electoral Commission (EC).
«The Supreme
Court of Ghana erred by linking Alfred Agbesi Woyome to the Waterville contract by «necessary linkage «using the now «residual unspecified Jurisdiction» to ground «Justice «as their main Principle in ordering a
refund of
monies Paid to Mr. Alfred Agbesi Woyome legally under the laws of Ghana.»
Following delays in retrieving the
money, the Supreme
Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the
court's judgment ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
court's judgment ordering Mr. Woyome to
refund the cash to the state.
An earlier statement from Lawyers of Mr. Woyome insisted that «the Supreme
Court of Ghana erred by linking Alfred Agbesi Woyome to the Waterville contract by «necessary linkage» using the now «residual unspecified Jurisdiction'to ground «Justice «as their main Principle in ordering a
refund of
monies paid to Mr. Alfred Agbesi Woyome legally under the laws of Ghana.»
The action he initiated at the ICC in March this year followed a last year's Supreme
Court judgement that he received the
money through fraudulent means as there was no contract between him and the state, hence ordered to
refund.
Following delays in retrieving the
money, Supreme
Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney General clearance to execute the
court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to
refund the cash to the state.
NIFA officials say any surplus was achieved through «one - shot» measures such as reserve fund transfers and borrowing
money to pay tax
refunds and major
court settlements.
«May we also point out that since his arrest and even up to about a week ago, our son has made several overtures to the arresting authority for him to
refund the
money since they now claim in
court that it came from government coffers.
«It is instructive that out of over 300 names listed as having received
money from the ONSA, all those who offered to
refund money were not arraigned in
court.
The the
court therefore ordered that the «3rd Respondent [Alfred Agbesi Woyome] herein to
refund to the Republic of Ghana all sums of
money paid to him upon or as a result of the unconstitutional conduct of the 1st Respondent [The Attorney General], therein 1st Defendant in purported pursuance of the said inoperative Agreements dated 26th APril 2006.»
That means you have a tax offset — basically you owe a government entity or
court some amount of
money, and the IRS is going to potentially take your
refund to pay it.
They can result in wage garnishments without the lender going to
court, intercepted tax
refunds, not enough
money left each myth to live safely, few payment accommodations, and massive collection fees tacked on.
Since there is no security attached to the
money you invested, you can do nothing except go to a
court when there is a default in
refund of payment of accrued interest or capital.
Chase
refunds $ 50 million in robo - signing settlement — Chase agreed to
refund money and drop thousands of
court judgments it won against cardholders in poorly documented lawsuits... (See Chase robo - signing settlement)
If your Trial by Written Declaration is successful it will prevent a negative point from going on your driving record, which will probably save you
money on your auto insurance, and the
court will
refund 100 % of the bail you deposited with them.
Over time, with the passage of the Family Support Act of 1988 requiring all states to develop and implement formulas to compute the amount of
money that should be sent by the «absent» parent (yes indeed, the statutory language assumes one parent is absent), the
court - based child support system for divorcing or never married parents turned into a bureaucratic system with draconian powers to garnish wages, take tax
refunds, licenses and impose other punishments for people who fail to properly support their children.
If you order parsons chairs from Carrington
Court Direct and are not satisfied with the quality, we will we will fix the problem or
refund your
money.