Sentences with phrase «court reversed»

Therefore, the court reversed the trial court and reinstated the jury verdict in favor of the Owners.

Therefore, the court reversed the trial court and instructed it to enter an order an order prohibiting further solicitations by the Association.

The appellate court reversed the trial court, determining that the Co-op did have the power to eject the Shareholder, so long as it followed its own rules and acted in good faith while furthering its corporate purpose.

In an unreported decision, a California appellate court reversed an award made in favor of the former property owner because it determined that a commercial real estate broker was not responsible for property sale not closing, despite the fact the broker erroneously valued the property and also acted as an undisclosed dual agent.

The appellate court reversed the trial court's ruling, determining that the Broker had potential liability in his capacity as owner, president, or designated officer / broker for Crank's actions because the Broker's duty to conform with the Act was non-delegable.

Thus, the court reversed the trial court's overruling of the jury verdict, finding the Broker liable for intentional misrepresentations.

The appellate court reversed the trial court decision and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its findings.

Therefore, the court reversed the rulings in favor of Duemeland on the defamation claims and sent the case back to the trial court to resolve the fact dispute involved with the defamation claims.

The court found that there was no support for the trial court's award, and so the court reversed the commission award to the Broker.

Thus, the court reversed the trial court's decision and the matter was sent back to the trial court for entry of an order dismissing the Buyers» lawsuit.

Thus, the court reversed the trial court and sent the entire case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

Thus, the court reversed the lower court and sent the case back to the trial court with an order to enter judgment in favor of the Salesperson for the unpaid commission amounts.

Thus, the court reversed the trial court's rulings on the defamation allegations.

The court ruled that the Developer had been inappropriately dismissed from this case by the trial court, and so the court reversed the lower court's ruling and reinstated the Brokerage's claims against the Developer.

The court reversed the trial court and dismissed the Company's lawsuit.

Thus, the court reversed the trial court's dismissal of the Buyers» lawsuit and ruled that a four year statute of limitations applied.

Therefore, the court reversed the lower courts and sent the case back to the trial court.

Federal appellate court reversed trial court's summary judgment, allowing resident to pursue claim that city's failure to make reasonable accommodation to municipal ordinance and permit resident to keep a miniature horse as a service animal on resident's property was in violation of the ADA and FHA.

The court reversed the criminal conviction of the appellants, as it found that the plain language and legislative history of RESPA did not indicate an intent to include the...

After noting the limited grounds upon which an arbitration award may be vacated, the state supreme court reversed the trial court's decision to vacate the award.

The appellate court reversed, finding that the trial court's instruction to the jury that the Listing Broker did not owe the Buyer a fiduciary duty was in error.

Thus, the court reversed summary judgment in favor of Broker on the negligent misrepresentation claim.

An appeals court reversed, and the case was further appealed to the state's highest court.

The court reversed an order for new trial on damages, affirmed the finding of fraud, and affirmed the award of a $ 138,000 commission and $ 2 million in punitive damages.

Thus, the court reversed the lower courts and sent the case back to the lower courts for further proceedings.

Therefore, the court reversed the $ 15,000 award for that transaction but upheld the remainder of the awards against the Salesperson and the Brokerage.

The appeals court reversed, concluding that the yield spread premium was not payment for a service but rather payment for referring an above par loan to the lender and that it was therefore a RESPA violation.

However, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling, finding that the state had failed to use a method «reasonably calculated» to notify the owner of the sale.

Thus, the supreme court reversed the lower court decision.

The trial court found in favor of the buyer, but on appeal, the appellate court reversed that ruling.

Thus, the court reversed the negligent misrepresentation allegations against the Inspector and sent these allegations back to the trial court for further proceedings.

Thus, the court reversed the jury verdict's award of future commissions but affirmed the other awards as well as the other rulings of the trial court.

The trial court found for the insurer, but the appellate court reversed the decision based on inconsistencies in the policy's language.

Therefore, the court reversed the trial court and prohibited further solicitations by the association.

Consequently, the court reversed the awards for punitive damages and mental anguish made by the trial jury.

However, the Alabama Supreme Court reversed the decision and sent the case back for further proceedings.

Therefore, the court reversed the trial court.

The Divisional Court reversed that and found in the purchasers» favour.

Accordingly, the appellate court reversed summary judgment, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Since the parking space provision in the lease did not identify an appropriate limit for parking spaces and thus was ambiguous, the court reversed the lower courts and sent the case back to the trial court to allow the parties to submit evidence to clarify the ambiguous parking - space provision in the lease.

The court reversed summary judgment and dismissal of claims in favor of the licensee.

The trial court ruled against the tenant, but the Appellate Court reversed the trial court, finding that because his illness made it impossible for the prospective tenant to work, he was entitled to reasonable accommodation.

On appeal, the appellate court reversed the court's decision with respect to the licensee.

The appeals court reversed the judgment and found the broker liable for all damages plus interest because the licensee was acting within the scope of his employment.

A federal appeals court reversed and held that the property owners could challenge the JDs in court — click here to read more about the earlier decision.

The trial court ruled in favor of the City, but the appellate court reversed and found the TUF to be an impermissible excise tax.

The appeals court reversed the decision, concluding that the sellers weren't entitled to keep the deposit because they hadn't suffered any actual damages.

The court reversed the conviction outright rather than order a new trial...

Accordingly, the appellate court reversed the trial court's decision and stated that a trial court may not simply assume that a homosexual lifestyle or environment is detrimental to a child.

A Google statement said: «We are disappointed the court reversed the jury finding that Java is open and free for everyone.