The questions Kaine raised as a defense lawyer were mostly related to process — from the time given for federal
court review of cases and the rules that Virginia state courts had for review of capital cases to the quality of the lawyers provided to criminal defendants in those cases and the way those lawyers carried out that defense — but that process, as Kaine said at the time, is sometimes the difference between life and death.
Samsung, EFF, and other technology companies and public interest groups sought and won Supreme
Court review of the case.
Not exact matches
Even if the
court grants a broader
review and the
case remains in limbo, opponents
of the CFPB have begun building the
case for removing Cordray anyway.
The law also requires a civilian
review when commanders decline to prosecute, requires dishonourable discharge or dismissal for those convicted, eliminate the statute
of limitations for
courts - martial in rape and sexual assault
cases and criminalizes retaliation against victims who report an assault.
Huawei or its subsidiaries have been cited as a defendant or co-defendant in at least 172 federal patent infringement
cases since 2003, according to a
review of court filings.
Reviewing the
case of a convicted drug dealer whose car police had tracked for 28 days with a GPS device, the
court warned authorities to apply for warrants before using that kind
of tactic.
After the decision, the Baltimore office
of the public defender began
reviewing hundreds
of cases which hinged on StingRay technology, all
of which could potentially be challenged as a result
of the Maryland
court ruling.
Last week, AARP filed an appeal
of the Fifth Circuit ruling, while New York, Oregon and California filed a motion asking the
court for permission to rehear the
case in front
of the full panel
of judges — known as an en banc
review.
However, Lawlor says the Florida Supreme
Court in 2003 ruled that the shooting
of a separate victim constituted a separate incident when
reviewing the
case of a fatal shooting at a fraternity graduation party involving multiple victims.
NRF asked the Supreme
Court to
review the
case, saying the issue was «
of staggering importance.»
And even if Canadian
courts ultimately deem such probing too onerous within the rubric
of «reasonableness»
review, such details can provide fodder for public commentary that can undermine the government's position in the
court of public opinion (regarding the economic
case for increased oil sands production, for example, see University
of Alberta Professor Andrew Leach's commentary here).
The
court also found that the «amended complaint in this
case sufficiently pleads that Elliott was a controller with respect to» the sale, thus implicating a higher standard
of review.
Heather Dietrick, Gawker's president and general counsel, says that the company's lawyers plan to
review all
of the documents released by the F.B.I. to see what Hogan told the F.B.I. during the extortion investigation and whether that matches the testimony he's given in his state
court case again Gawker.
Following the
review's publication, Bishop Peter Hancock, the Church
of England's lead safeguarding bishop, said: «At the heart
of this
case was a judgment, on the balance
of probabilities, as to whether, in the event that her claim for compensation reached trial, a
court would have concluded that Carol was abused by Bishop Bell.
The board
of the Human Rights Commission will decide whether to ask the Kentucky Supreme
Court to hear the
case after
reviewing the opinion, Ray Sexton, the agency's executive director, told the Lexington Herald - Leader.
Whatever Marbury was supposed to mean about the scope
of the power
of judicial
review, it is a notable fact that the
Court declined to exercise that power to declare another act
of Congress to be unconstitutional until 1857, when it ruled in the
case of Dred Scott v. Sandford.
According to the standard account
of the matter, the power
of judicial
review — that is, the authority
of the federal judiciary to invalidate acts
of Congress and the President when they are deemed to be unconstitutional — came to be entrenched in our law by the acceptance, tacit or otherwise,
of the Supreme
Court's ruling in the 1803
case of Marbury v. Madison.
It takes the vote
of four Supreme
Court Justices to initiate
review of a
case.
Similarly, the
court case highlights the need for the organic industry to
review and tighten its own protocols and certification management, to deliver uniformity and certainty for those on the front line
of this issue: the farmers who feed us and risk their own investments.
«We are aware that Woolworths in broad terms may be doing a similar sort
of thing, and we think that will sort itself out depending on how this
court case works out,» ACCC chairman Rod Sims told The Australian Financial
Review.
So before you push back and ask the
courts to
review your
case one more time (in the hopes
of winning sole custody), consider the unexpected benefits you can expect to enjoy once you all get used to the changes brought on by a joint custody arrangement.
The National Adoption Center will
review cases on the list over six months and then send files to the Minister
of Education for approval before proceeding to
court.
Despite the findings
of studies
of parent - child attachment that support co-parenting arrangements for the majority
of infants and young children, a recent issue
of the Family
Court Review (2012) examined perspectives for and against co-parenting
of young children in disputed
cases.
Not all human rights can be derogating — regardless
of the situation, the prohibition
of torture remains absolute, for instance — but there is flexibility, provided the
court can
review the relevant
cases.
The Log Cabin Republicans» reply brief Friday said that the Justices»
review of that
case was opposed by the other challengers based on the argument that the
Court should await the development
of a full factual record at a trial on the policy's constitutionality.
A federal appeals
court in Manhattan agreed Thursday to postpone any retrial of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver on corruption charges until the Supreme Court acts on a planned petition to further review his
court in Manhattan agreed Thursday to postpone any retrial
of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver on corruption charges until the Supreme
Court acts on a planned petition to further review his
Court acts on a planned petition to further
review his
case.
SPEAKING ON Law Day May 3 at the
Court of Appeals in Albany, Gov. David Paterson unveiled his plan to create a panel to
review immigration
cases.
Kellner in an emailed statement to reporters blasted Silver, saying the ruling by Levine proved the Assembly Ethics Committee's
review of the harassment
case shwed it was «nothing more then a kangaroo
court doing Speaker Silver's bidding.»
A high
court judge said they had «an arguable
case for seeking the relief claimed by way
of judicial
review».
He also referenced a
court case involving the Civilian Complaint
Review Board from a year earlier, «when the Law Department took a very clear position that the state law required us to keep this kind
of information confidential.»
The Federal High
Court had added that «but the court trying the charge may be entitled, in appropriate cases, to review the terms of the freezing order.&r
Court had added that «but the
court trying the charge may be entitled, in appropriate cases, to review the terms of the freezing order.&r
court trying the charge may be entitled, in appropriate
cases, to
review the terms
of the freezing order.»
In February 2017 however, Mr. Amidu withdrew his suit seeking an oral examination, explaining that the change
of government under the New Patriotic Party under His Excellency the President, Nana Addo Dankwah Akuffo Addo and his Attorney General, Miss Gloria Akuffo's assurance to retrieve all judgment debts wrongfully paid to individuals Mr. Woyome in response prayed the Supreme
Court to stay proceedings on the oral examination since he had filed for a
review on the
case.
Public Advocate Letitia James filed a motion to expedite the
review of the
case on April 14, which a state appeal
court approved, records show.
This means that any extension would not only be: - subject to a specific
case being made by the Director
of Public Prosecutions; - subject every seven days up to the agreed limit to the approval
of a High
Court Judge; - subject to the regular report
of the independent reviewer with an annual debate in parliament; - but also be subject in each and every instance to a specific parliamentary notification procedure, to a further statement to parliament on the individual
case, a
review on the specific
case by the independent reviewer and with the provision for this House to scrutinise and debate the report and all the circumstances.
Former state Senate leader John Sampson became the latest politician to ask for a
review of his corruption conviction based on the U.S. Supreme
Court's decision last week narrowing federal bribery and «honest services fraud» statutes in the
case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.
«43
cases of car theft were reported to the command in the period under
review with 85 persons arrested and charged to
court,» he said.
Cases that may have previously been automatically placed on the Supreme
Court's docket by appeals or writs of error could now be reviewed on a writ of certoriari, which could be granted or denied at the court's discre
Court's docket by appeals or writs
of error could now be
reviewed on a writ
of certoriari, which could be granted or denied at the
court's discre
court's discretion.
The Supreme
Court on Wednesday dismissed a
case brought before it, which sought to challenge the legality
of the Constitution
Review Commission.
Mr Woyome who claims his human rights has been abused and was occasioned by the
Review Decision
of the Supreme
Court of Ghana has sent this aspect
of the
case to the African
Court on Human and Peoples» Right in Arusha Tanzania by invoking article 40 read together with article 75
of the 1992 constitution
of The Republic
of Ghana under
case number Ref: AfCHPR / Reg.
A
review of the litigation filed by her office, along with prior
court rulings, suggests NYC Public Advocate Tish James lacks the legal authority to sue the city in some
of those
cases.
Letitia James filed a motion to expedite the
review of the
case last week and the
court agreed Monday.
A recent appeals
court ruling in a
case that grew out
of PSEG Long Island's expansion
of an electrical substation on Old Stone Highway in Amagansett, represents a mixed decision for East Hampton Town, which had sought to hold the utility provider to local zoning laws that would have required planning board
review of the project.
Allowing intercept evidence is not the answer - government
reviews have shown time and time again that it would not make a bit
of difference to current control order
cases - and we have already shown that we are going to remain in thrall to the European
Court of Human Rights.
Former state Senate leader John Sampson Tuesday became the latest politician to ask for a
review of his corruption conviction based on the Supreme
Court's decision last week narrowing federal bribery and «honest services fraud» statutes in the
case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.
He supports the
review and potential revocation
of land claim settlements awarded to Iroquois tribes in
court cases.
He said, «In the course
of further
review of facts
of this
case, it transpired that the legal issues arising from the originating motion
of the applicant are very recondite and novel as there have not been concrete apex
court decisions on them and they also affect and will affect many criminal and civil
cases all over Nigeria where the Administration
of Criminal Justice Act is being applied.»
The facts
of the
case under
review are briefly presented below, followed in subsequent parts, by an analysis
of the legal bases for the
court's decision.
«These are
cases with the
courts and the
courts have a deadline to finish and as soon as they finish they [registration
review officers] will give us the report and then we will finish up with the final stages
of the register.
But while Judge Pham agreed that the technique had been subject to testing and peer
review, it flunked on the other two points suggested by the Supreme
Court to weigh
cases like this one: the test
of proven accuracy and general acceptance by scientists.
After numerous advocacy attempts, including letters from 31 Nobel Laureates and petitions with thousands
of signatures, in October 2014 Iran's Supreme
Court announced it would
review his
case.