Sentences with phrase «court ruled in favor»

Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the Commission Recipients on all of the allegations made by the Challengers.

A trial court ruled in favor of the sellers, holding that the buyers and the brokers were liable, either jointly or individually, for damages of $ 14,437, costs of approximately $ 3,500, and attorney fees of $ 22,500.

A territorial court ruled in her favor, but that decision was overturned by a Federal District Court.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Association, and the Member appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of Galdjie, and the Darwishes appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Vendor and entered an injunction preventing WIRE from accessing the Municipalities databases, basing its decision on the copyright claim alone.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Broker and the Brokerage, and the Buyer appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Sellers, and the Buyers appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Brokerage and awarded the Brokerage the full commission and also its attorney's fees.

Prior to trial, the Sellers declared bankruptcy; the homeowners association settled with the Buyer; and the trial court ruled in favor of the property inspector.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Owner, and the Buyer appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Brokerage, and the Buyers appealed.

The lower court ruled in favor of the Association and found the Broker in violation of the Stipulation.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Association, and the Brokerage appealed.

In 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in favor of the real estate team that sold a house and did not tell the buyer it had been the site of a murder - suicide in 2006.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Seller, and the Buyer's Representative appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Brokerage, and the Salesperson appealed.

The bankruptcy court ruled in favor of the Auctioneer, and the Attorney appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Sellers.

The trial court ruled in favor of Lane, and ordered the Challengers to appear at an Association arbitration.

Thus, no misrepresentations were made by the Salesperson and so the court ruled in favor of the Salesperson and Brokerage (and also dismissed the cross-claim made against the Buyer's Representative, as those claims no longer had any basis).

The trial court ruled in favor of the Brokerage, and the Clients appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of the defendants and so the defendants dismissed their counterclaims against the Investor.

The trial court ruled in favor Duemeland, determining that the evidence demonstrated that the statements made by Duemeland were true and also that Bertsch was not harmed by the alleged statements.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Tenant, and the appellate court affirmed.

Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the Sellers and so judgment was entered on behalf of the Sellers, Salesperson, Brokerage, and the Buyer's Representative.

The United States Tax Court ruled in favor of the IRS.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Broker.

The trial court ruled in favor of the insurance companies.

The trial court ruled in favor of the seller, and the brokerage appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Bank on all of the Salesperson's allegations, and the Salesperson appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Lender, and the Buyer appealed.

Following a trial, the trial court ruled in favor of Hubbell and awarded it the entire commission amount it sought.

The owners sued and both the trial court and later the appeals court ruled in favor of the owners.

The trial court ruled in favor of the association.

The trial court ruled in favor of the salesperson because the buyers had acknowledged that they had received a survey showing the property was in a flood plain.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Brokerage, finding the firm was not vicariously liable for the Salesperson's conduct.

The trial court ruled in favor of the mortgage broker by finding that the mortgage broker was not a «creditor» and thus was not subject to the Act's terms.

The court ruled in favor of the brokers against the plaintiffs.

The trial court ruled in favor of the City, but the appellate court reversed and found the TUF to be an impermissible excise tax.

In the third case, a Massachusetts trial court ruled in favor of the brokerage in 2013, holding that the state's real estate statute allows real estate salespeople to be classified as independent contractors or as employees controlled.

The lower court ruled in favor of the buyers and awarded them $ 18,375 from the buyer brokerage and the sellers.

The court ruled in favor of the student, and Sumner appealed.

The outcome of this case was that the California Supreme Court ruled in favor of strictly interpreting broad confidentiality regarding statements and behavior before, during and after mediation sessions, stating:

History was made on Friday, June 27th, when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of same - sex marriage nationwide.

Washington, DC — «Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood of Southwest Ohio (PPSWO) and the privacy of patients by affirming a lower court decision to protect confidential patient medical records.

The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled in favor of the biological father, but the prospective adoptive parents have appealed the ruling and the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to take up the case.

In 2012, a district court found the case in favor of Google, but, in May of last year, the judge's ruling was overturned when an appeals court ruled in favor of Oracle.

In fact, a court ruled in favor of a person who was owed 0.591 BTC by a company.

Judge Anat Baron of the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the exchange.