Sentences with phrase «court ruling on the matter»

But, as of today, the only court ruling on the matter concluded that Puerto Rico should be treated like a state for 11th Amendment purposes.

So long as we have a Supreme Court ruling on this matter, I am sure, they are history,» he said.

«There is a Supreme Court ruling on this matter.

But the Upper East Regional Minister, Rockson Bukari, has debunked the allegations, stating that, he was only acting on a directive from the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development following an Accra High court ruling on the matter.

I understand it took decades before the Supreme Court ruled on the matter but I believe this amendment was the basis.

Not exact matches

On March 6, 2018, Judge Jack B. Weinstein of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled that virtual currencies are commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and therefore subject to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) anti-fraud and anti-manipulation enforcement authority.1 Granting the CFTC's request for a preliminary injunction against the defendants who allegedly engaged in deception and fraud involving virtual currency spot markets, Judge Weinstein noted that «[u] ntil Congress clarifies the matter,» the CFTC has «concurrent authority» along with other state and federal administrative agencies and civil and criminal courts over transactions in virtual currency.2

The New York Times: Irish Poised to Revisit Abortion Law Abortion is back on the agenda in Ireland after a European Court of Human Rights ruling last year found the state in violation of its own Constitution on the matter.

This Court was specifically mandated to «proceed and act and give relief on principles and rules which, in the opinion of the said Court, shall be as nearly as may be conformable to the principles and rules on which the ecclesiastical courts of Ireland have heretofore acted and given relief» [and] the [Irish] Constitution has inherited and amended this former jurisprudence in matrimonial matters.

A ruling in November, 2003 by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts similarly affirmed «marital» rights for gay and lesbian couples and handed the matter on to the legislature of the Commonwealth.

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a ruling this afternoon allowing the Christian humanitarian organization World Vision to base its hiring decisions on matters of religious belief.

If any court of law, having the jurisdiction to decide on this matter, rules that any provision of these Official Rules is invalid or unenforceable, then that provision will be removed from the Official Rules without affecting the rest of the Trules that any provision of these Official Rules is invalid or unenforceable, then that provision will be removed from the Official Rules without affecting the rest of the TRules is invalid or unenforceable, then that provision will be removed from the Official Rules without affecting the rest of the TRules without affecting the rest of the Terms.

However, on Tuesday, France's highest court for judicial matters, the Court of Cassation, ruled an undercover police officer's actions in the case had been unlawful, and ordered the Paris Court of Appeal to look again at the investigation's valicourt for judicial matters, the Court of Cassation, ruled an undercover police officer's actions in the case had been unlawful, and ordered the Paris Court of Appeal to look again at the investigation's valiCourt of Cassation, ruled an undercover police officer's actions in the case had been unlawful, and ordered the Paris Court of Appeal to look again at the investigation's valiCourt of Appeal to look again at the investigation's validity.

Once the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on a matter of U.S. Constitutional law, the only ways to change it are either for the Supreme Court to overturn their decision in a later ruling on a different case or for the U.S. Constitution to be amended, according to the process set out in Article V.

The court ruled that someone's age was a matter of «objective fact» and can not be based on physical appearance or demeanour.

This isn't the place to argue about how the Supreme Court should rule on the matter.

@JoeTaxpayer: Well, it is true that no court has directly ruled on the matter.

«This case deserves a fair day in court and we expect the court will rule on this matter based on the merits of the case and nothing else,» the statement read.

Justice Anka also ruled that leave was not required for the matter to be heard during vacation as Order 4 Rule 5 of the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules of 2009, enjoins the court to pursue speed and justice on issues of fundamental human rights.

He said the trial court had become functus - officio to grant such request to the defendant who he said had yet to appeal previous rulings that were delivered against him on the same subject matter.

«Last year, the Supreme Court ruled that while it is willing to consider whether the lack of a right to die breaches the European Convention on Human Rights, it thought that Parliament should first have the opportunity to legislate on the matter.

The Supreme Court has already ruled on the matter of ratification timing in Coleman v. Miller, finding:

Ozekhome said the order was brought pursuant to order 26 rule 8 (1) of the Federal High Court Civil Procedure Rule 2009 and Section 44 (1) of the 1999 constitution which gives the court the discretionary powers to adjudicate on such matrule 8 (1) of the Federal High Court Civil Procedure Rule 2009 and Section 44 (1) of the 1999 constitution which gives the court the discretionary powers to adjudicate on such maCourt Civil Procedure Rule 2009 and Section 44 (1) of the 1999 constitution which gives the court the discretionary powers to adjudicate on such matRule 2009 and Section 44 (1) of the 1999 constitution which gives the court the discretionary powers to adjudicate on such macourt the discretionary powers to adjudicate on such matter.

On the issue of the matter for the day, Justice Idris also affirmed that indeed the «ruling of the court can not be arrested».

The supreme Court (ordinary bench) sitting on the matter, presided over by His Lordship Samuel Date - Bah (JSC) in his judgment on the 14th June, 2013 made the following ruling:

U.S. Supreme Court justices agreed to a Trump administration request to block a lower court ruling that would have eased the refugee ban and allowed up to 24,000 refugees to enter the country before the end of October, but this isn't the court's last word on the maCourt justices agreed to a Trump administration request to block a lower court ruling that would have eased the refugee ban and allowed up to 24,000 refugees to enter the country before the end of October, but this isn't the court's last word on the macourt ruling that would have eased the refugee ban and allowed up to 24,000 refugees to enter the country before the end of October, but this isn't the court's last word on the macourt's last word on the matter.

«He however, will like to put it on record that the facts of the substantial matter are not before the Supreme Court since the apex court was only invited to rule on some preliminary issues in the process of commencing the tCourt since the apex court was only invited to rule on some preliminary issues in the process of commencing the tcourt was only invited to rule on some preliminary issues in the process of commencing the trial.

The judge who will rule on the matter, state Supreme Court Judge Lisa Fisher — who was elected in a 2014 upset running as a Republican — noted at one point that there is «a thin line on whether the court can hear this case.&rCourt Judge Lisa Fisher — who was elected in a 2014 upset running as a Republican — noted at one point that there is «a thin line on whether the court can hear this case.&rcourt can hear this case.»

«That this House notes the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Hirst v the United Kingdom in which it held that there had been no substantive debate by members of the legislature on the continued justification for maintaining a general restriction on the right of prisoners to vote; acknowledges the treaty obligations of the UK; is of the opinion that legislative decisions of this nature should be a matter for democratically - elected lawmakers; and supports the current situation in which no prisoner is able to vote except those imprisoned for contempt, default or on remand.»

It, therefore, comes as a surprise that INEC, which was a party to the matter, can not advise political parties on the right course to take but, instead, continues to encourage politicians to embark on illegal actions through active participation of its officials, who are sent to observe such illegal primaries, whereas the apex court in the land has ruled on such matter.

He said that the court has started hearing the appeal and would deliver its ruling on June 9, therefore, the lower court could not share jurisdiction on the same matter with the Supreme Ccourt has started hearing the appeal and would deliver its ruling on June 9, therefore, the lower court could not share jurisdiction on the same matter with the Supreme Ccourt could not share jurisdiction on the same matter with the Supreme CourtCourt.

Gulak, the former Special Adviser to Jonathan on Political Matters, yesterday at the PDP secretariat, said he had to assumed office as PDP national Chairman following a court ruling.

In their ruling on the matter, the justices of the apex court ruled that the President is not bound by the advice of the Council of State on the appointments in question.

The judge ruled, «In view of the pending appeal and application for stay of proceedings at the Court of Appeal, this matter is adjourned sine die (indefinitely) to await the decision of the Court of Appeal on the fundamental issue of service and / or of stay of proceedings.»

Justice Mohammed gave the order while delivering ruling on an oral application for preservative order brought by the plaintiff (Accord Party) seeking the court's intervention on the matter.

He said the police had consecutively invaded the residence of the two claimants, humiliated, extorted, and publicly embarrassed them over civil matter in contempt of the court and called on the Inspector General of Police to urgently intervene to protect sanctity of the judiciary and the rule of law.

Casey disagrees, but in any event he says that if the appeals court hasn't yet ruled by the time Lamberth does, it will probably consolidate the two cases and rule on the entire matter.

Courts have handed down mixed rulings on the matter, and the National Labor Relations Board in Washington, D.C., has not ruled on the issue.

Lamberth, who ordered a temporary ban on federal funding for human embryonic stem cells research last August that an appeals court later overturned, is expected to issue a final ruling on the matter as soon as this summer.

The court's ruling is likely the final word on the matter, says Clara Sattler de Sousa e Brito, one of Brüstle's lawyers.

For any matters which are not subject to arbitration as set forth in these Official Rules and / or in connection with the entering of any judgment on an arbitration award in connection with these Official Rules and / or the Contest, the parties irrevocably submit and consent to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the state and federal courts located in or closest to the County of New York in the State of New York.

It has evaded standard rule - making procedures designed to collect evidence and encourage public participation; ignored the Supreme Court's interpretation of Title IX; pressured schools to adopt disciplinary proceedings that deny due process to the accused; insisted upon a definition of sexual harassment so broad that it threatens free speech on campus; and created within colleges units dedicated to reeducating students on all matters sexual and on the dictates of «social justice.»

Finally, Milazzo declined to rule on whether the funding formula had been adopted legally, saying state courts should consider the matter first.

After a federal appeals court struck down net neutrality regulations, Media Matters joined more than 85 organizations calling on the FCC to reclassify broadband and restore open Internet rules.

By ruling on narrow matters of standing, the court leaves Cuccinelli uncensured and free to harass scientists who have ever been at private schools and private nonprofits in the state at any time in the past.

On March 2, the California Supreme Court ruled that the emails and texts of public employees dealing with official business are to be considered a matter of public record even if they are sent from private devices or accounts.

From the article:... SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters)-- Google Inc is already getting requests to remove objectionable personal information from its search engine after Europe's top court ruled that subjects have the «right to be forgotten,» a source familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.

As I reported here when it launched last September, Gavelytics uses artificial intelligence to extract data from court dockets and applies analytics to reveal insights about judges, such as how they might rule on particular matters and in what timeframe.

Allianz's position on appeal was that reg 44/2001 provides that, when the court of one European member state becomes seised of a matter, all other European courts must not allow the same matter to proceed until the court first seised has ruled, even if the proceedings first seised have purportedly been brought in breach of a jurisdiction agreement.

The second is that methods matter, and are largely what the court of public opinion rules on.

He says it relates to the top court's 2002 decision in R. v. Neil, which stated the general rule is that a lawyer or law firm shouldn't act directly contrary to the immediate interests of a current client, even on an unrelated matter.