Sentences with phrase «court summary of the case»

Not exact matches

An Ontario Court of Appeal justice has warned against «summary judgment at all costs» in her dissent of a ruling on the application of the doctrine of emergency in a personal injury case.

Safe Haven Safe House Same Sex Marriage Sanction SCR (State Case Registry) SDNH (State Directory of New Hires) Self Incrimination Separate Property Separation Separation Agreement Sequester Service of Process SESA (State Employment Security Agency) Settlement Severance of Parental Rights Sexual Abuse Shared Parenting Slander Special Advocate Special Master Spouse Spousal Support Sole Custody Special Needs Child Split Custody SPLS (State Parent Locator Services) Spousal Maintenance Stalking Stare Decisis State Court Statute Stay of Proceedings Stay - Away Order Stepchild Stepparent Adoption Stipulation Stipulated Agreement Strike Structured Settlement Sua Sponte Subordination Subpoena Subpoena Ad Testificandum Subpoena Duces Tecum Substantive Law Success Fee Suit Summary Divorce Summary Judgment Summons Superior Court Supervised Access (Visitation) Surplusage

The letter to Tony Blair concludes: «We are ready to dispense simple, speedy, summary justice; we support all moves to increase the movement of cases through our courts provided that justice itself is not impaired.

In fact, since appearance of the contemnors before the Supreme Court (SC), their subsequent summary trial (if there was one), conviction and the fines imposed on all in addition to the jailing of the infamous Gang of Three, the case has generated a lot of debate amongst Ghanaians in and outside Ghana.

The city recently started withholding records that showed the outcomes of disciplinary cases against cops, and has fought in court an effort to release summaries of Pantaleo's civilian complaints.

Summary: This article reports on an upcoming Supreme Court case, Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, where the court will be asked to decide on what degree of services a district should provide to a special needs stuCourt case, Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, where the court will be asked to decide on what degree of services a district should provide to a special needs stucourt will be asked to decide on what degree of services a district should provide to a special needs student.

The voucher case comes to the Supreme Court on direct appeal of Keele's decision to award summary judgment to the state.

The case — Houston Federation of Teachers et al. v. Houston ISD — was filed in 2014 and just yesterday, United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Wm. Smith denied in the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, the district's request for summary judgment given the plaintiffs» due process claims.

MacPherson's summary of court documents provides more details on the case.

Some more action on the Ellora's Cave vs. Dear Author case filed in court over the last couple of weeks: Motion to add RWA Executive Director's Statement to Defense's Summary Judgment Motion Ann Jacobs as Counterclaimant — additional documents filed by, well, everyone Motion for Further Discovery filed by Dear Author Court hearing scheduled for October 8 -LSBcourt over the last couple of weeks: Motion to add RWA Executive Director's Statement to Defense's Summary Judgment Motion Ann Jacobs as Counterclaimant — additional documents filed by, well, everyone Motion for Further Discovery filed by Dear Author Court hearing scheduled for October 8 -LSBCourt hearing scheduled for October 8 -LSB-...]

News.lawreader.com has summaries of Kentucky cases, federal appellate decisions, U.S. Supreme Court decisions, and professional ethics cases.

The page includes a plain - English summary of the case, the questions presented, and links to blog commentary, the lower - court opinions, the oral argument transcript, all briefs, the decision when issued, counsel for each party, and outside resources.

In addition to the hearing schedules, docket information, party information, case summaries, webcasts of appeal hearings and factums on appeal, the Court will begin to post memorandums of argument on applications for leave to appeal after they are granted.

Thus the strike out provision of FPR 2010, r 4.4 (1) under which the case had proceeded in the Court of Appeal has to be construed without reference to «real prospects of success» test (as required for civil proceedings under CPR 1998 r 24.2); and FPR 2010 Practice Direction PD4A para 2.4 is «an unhelpful curiosity [in the absence of] a power in FPR 2010 to give summary judgment».

In Re: L - W (children)(contact order: committal)[2010] EWCA Civ 1253, [2010] All ER (D) 62 (Nov), the Court of Appeal reviewed the line of authorities on cases involving committal applications and set out a summary of the approach the court should Court of Appeal reviewed the line of authorities on cases involving committal applications and set out a summary of the approach the court should court should take:

I suppose it would be interesting (for no useful purpose) to see when the summary was put up because, as as it says in bold, at the top of the summary: «Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch) for information purposes only.»

Posts are summaries of recent appellate and Supreme Court cases.

On January 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in the case of Hryniak v. Mauldin, in which it signaled a fundamental shift in the way that summary judgment motions are to be handled in the Province of Ontario.

This page includes a plain - English summary of the case, the questions presented, and links to blog commentary, the lower - court opinions, the oral argument transcript, all briefs, the decision when issued, counsel for each party, and outside resources.

on Interesting Example of the Long Shadow of the SCC's Findings in a «Summary» NOC Case on the Court of Appeal's Upholding of Sanofi's Plavix Patent

If a pure case summary was part of or attached to an email (eg The Supreme Court of Canada today released a decision that decided...), and the email had a standard... [more]

My summary of the case is: A trial judge — he wasn't named in the Court of Appeal but his name can easily be discovered — had dismissed plaintiff's claim against the defendant bank and a solicitor for breach of fiduciary duty and negligence.

This is the Court's unofficial summary of the issues in Ediger v. Johnston SCC case no. 34408, an appeal scheduled for December 4, 2012.

We have assisted tens of thousands of British Columbians over the years through law reform, test case litigation, systemic advocacy, delivery of public legal education, summary advice, workshops and representation of clients before administrative tribunals and the courts.

Commentary: The Supreme Court of Canada in this case, and in the case of R. v. Conway, 2010 SCC 22 (see our blog summary here) has made clear that tribunals must address Charter issues which are raised before them (unless expressly exempted by their enabling statute).

You may want to read our summary of the Arizona Court of Appeals decision in the MacMillan v. Schwartz case that discusses this situation.

The Court held that the revelation of character cases can be roughly divided into three categories: i) where misconduct is extremely serious, sometimes bordering on criminal acts (e.g. theft or fraud), just cause for termination will usually exist; ii) where conduct reveals deceit, misrepresentation or misleading of employers, cause will likely be found; and iii) where there are errors in judgment or a failure to follow rules, it can not automatically be said that the employee was dishonest for the purposes of justifying summary dismissal.

... I conclude that the principles of law which govern the exercise of the Court's discretion in the circumstances of this case may in summary form be stated as follows: The defendants must establish that there has been inordinate delay and that this delay is inexcusable.

Summary: The respondent requested the Court to amend the award alleging that the tribunal had made a procedural error that affected the outcome of the case.

The above case summary is valuable example of the courts» treatment of termination of older employees with a long tenure of service.

Even if you have previously pursued your case in the courts with another attorney, we will happily review the case summary and history in order to help best determine the next best course of action for you and your case.

The B.C. Supreme Court ruled January 14 that stifling Alan Dutton's right to protest was not the primary purpose of a multi-million-dollar civil suit and, therefore, his application for a summary dismissal of the case was denied.

The [YOUR FIRM], PLLC, assists those who need legal representation for estate settlement or probate of a will in Florida, probate court administration, real estate probate of real property in Florida, summary probate administration of Florida probate cases, ancillary probate for non-Florida residents who die owning real estate or other probate assets in Florida, Florida probate litigation, Florida will contests, and will disputes, in the courts of probate throughout the State of Florida.

Since summary judgment is only appropriate when the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, when a court is presented with conflicting or contradictory theories, summary judgment is not appropriate, and the case should be presented to a jury for resolution of the contested facts.

The recent court of appeal case Kish v Sobchak 2016 BCCA 65 stems from a decision made on summary trial regarding a claim by the deceased's spouse to vary his Will to provide for her.

The legal research service Casemaker has launched a new case - digest service providing summaries of the most recent cases decided by the courts.

is designed to provide reporters, lawyers, educators, and the public with prompt, accurate, unbiased information about newsworthy and legally significant cases pending in and decided by the Federal Courts of Appeals... Use this Web site to find short summaries of recent opinions of public interest and noteworthy cases pending oral argument.

Notably, the site allows users to view and download documents and court filings from the commission cases against specific individuals and to obtain summaries of the charges against -LSB-...]

In the latest instalment of the Baby P cases, the secretary of state and Haringey have filed applications for permission to appeal the Court of Appeal's decision in R (on the application of Sharon Shoesmith) v Ofsted & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 642, [2011] All ER (D) 293 (May) allowing Ms Shoesmith's claims for judicial review of decisions relating to her summary dismissal.

Commentary and summaries of cases before the Philadelphia - based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

A schedule and brief summary of the court cases to be broadcast are available on the site.

17 As a result of this asymmetry, the court that makes the most authoritative pronouncements on the standard for granting summary judgment — the Court of Appeal — tends to do so in cases where the motions court has denied the complainant her day in ccourt that makes the most authoritative pronouncements on the standard for granting summary judgment — the Court of Appeal — tends to do so in cases where the motions court has denied the complainant her day in cCourt of Appeal — tends to do so in cases where the motions court has denied the complainant her day in ccourt has denied the complainant her day in courtcourt.

Notably, the site allows users to view and download documents and court filings from the commission cases against specific individuals and to obtain summaries of the charges against them.

A new report from Statistics Canada shows that, since the introduction of mandatory minimum penalties (MMPs) in 2005, there has been a small increase in the proportion of summary cases of certain violent crimes resulting in a guilty finding but a significant increase in custody sentences, and that cases can take longer to work their way through the courts.

In this case, the Court of Appeal upheld the judge's decision not to permit publication of his judgment, but allowed the appeal against the refusal to allow publication of a summary.

This unreported judgment of the Ottawa small claims court contains an excellent summary of the case law relating to the standard of care required of litigation counsel.

What follows is a summary of the significant cases from 2004 in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and the Massachusetts Appeals Court.

In granting the motion for summary judgement, the Court found that it would be unduly onerous for a condominium corporation to have a duty to provide security at every board meeting to prevent a potential assault, even in the case of a contentious meeting.

* Canadian Criminal Cases — 1898 to present * Dominion Law Reports — 1912 to present * Labour Arbitration Cases — 1948 to present * Land Compensation Reports — 1971 to present * Ontario Municipal Board Reports — 1972 to present * Alberta Decisions, Civil Cases — 1979 to 2007 * Alberta Decisions, Criminal Cases — 1979 to 2007 * All - Canada Weekly Summaries — 1977 to present * British Columbia Decisions, Civil Cases — 1977 to present * British Columbia Decisions, Criminal Cases — 1977 to 2007 * British Columbia Labour Arbitration Decisions — 1982 to present * British Columbia Labour Relations Board Decisions — 1979 to present * Canadian Labour Arbitration Summaries — 1986 to present * Charter of Rights Decisions * — 1961 to 2007 (* includes Bill of Rights) * Federal Court of Appeal Decisions — 1980 to 1999 * Manitoba Decisions, Civil Cases — 1978 to 1999 * Manitoba Decisions, Criminal Cases — 1978 to 1999 * Saskatchewan Decisions, Civil Cases — 1980 to 2007 * Saskatchewan Decisions, Criminal Cases — 1980 to 2007 * Supreme Court of Canada Decisions — 1978 to present * Weekly Criminal Bulletin — 1977 to present

But aside from a few isolated examples, no summaries are produced for the thousands of cases each year which are decided in the Administrative Court and Court of Appeal, both of which are central to the public law system.