Sentences with phrase «court testimony from witnesses»

In determining custody, the courts take into consideration the sex, age and emotional needs of the child, educational considerations, the child's parental preference, and any court testimony from witnesses.

Not exact matches

Despite the fact that, by virtue of being a woman she would have been considered an unreliable witness whose testimony wouldn't hold up in court, Mary Magdalene is charged with telling the world that Jesus Christ rose from the dead.
Brennan based his complaint on testimony from David Wildstein, the star witness in a Newark federal court case involving two of Christie's former aides, who testified that Christie learned about the lane closures while they were happening — and laughed.
Before the judge's ruling, Assistant U.S. Attorney Catherine Mirabile had said in court that the prosecution may want to call other witnesses Monday morning if the judge decided to strike some testimony from the record.
The judge indicated the lawyer, Richard Morvillo, was allowed to be in court and rules preventing witnesses from hearing other witness testimony did not apply to him.
Polera cross-appeals from the District Court's ruling in limine precluding testimony from her proposed expert witnesses.
Sometimes the jury may request to see evidence again or go over witness testimony from the court transcript.
In Salvas v. Wal - Mart Stores, the SJC ruled that a trial court judge erred when he decertified the class action, excluded testimony from the plaintiffs» expert witness, and granted partial summary judgment in favor of Wal - Mart.
From these he mined his extraordinary collection of found poems, TestimonyCharles Reznikoff's Testimony: The United States (1885 - 1915) Recitative, published in two volumes by Black Sparrow in 1978, is 530 pages of short poem - sections extracted from court - room witness statemeFrom these he mined his extraordinary collection of found poems, TestimonyCharles Reznikoff's Testimony: The United States (1885 - 1915) Recitative, published in two volumes by Black Sparrow in 1978, is 530 pages of short poem - sections extracted from court - room witness statemefrom court - room witness statements.
«If an illness or a disability prevents a witness from attending the hearing, the court, even on its own initiative, may order that the witness be examined at a distance using a technological means, or appoint a commissioner to take the witness's testimony.
For example, there are court filing fees to file the complaint (in Broward County, the 2018 fee for filing a new lawsuit in civil court is $ 401.00 — see the Broward Clerk of Court's Fee Schedule), process servers, expert witnesses, court reporters, and the testimony from doctors who will charge hundreds of dollars for each hour of their court filing fees to file the complaint (in Broward County, the 2018 fee for filing a new lawsuit in civil court is $ 401.00 — see the Broward Clerk of Court's Fee Schedule), process servers, expert witnesses, court reporters, and the testimony from doctors who will charge hundreds of dollars for each hour of their court is $ 401.00 — see the Broward Clerk of Court's Fee Schedule), process servers, expert witnesses, court reporters, and the testimony from doctors who will charge hundreds of dollars for each hour of their Court's Fee Schedule), process servers, expert witnesses, court reporters, and the testimony from doctors who will charge hundreds of dollars for each hour of their court reporters, and the testimony from doctors who will charge hundreds of dollars for each hour of their time.
This attorney must be able to collect all relevant and material evidence, obtain statements and testimony from witnesses, conduct pretrial discovery, make timely and proper court filings and advocate on behalf of the victim and family from the start of the case through settlement or verdict.
Guest Lecturer, Ontario Psychological Association, 48th Annual Convention, «The Psychologist in Court: Pre-trial Preparation, Testimony from the Witness Stand, A Lawyer's Perspective», (Toronto, Ontario) February 16, 1995
Upon learning that Freeman intended to disclose an additional or new medical expert witness to offer opinions on the issue of causation, Dr. Crays» lawyers moved to adopt the rulings from the earlier case and bar any testimony of plaintiff's newly disclosed expert opinion pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219 (e).
However, at trial, the appellant provided an «insufficient factual underpinning» to ground compensation for loss of earning capacity; the Court of Appeal found this part of the claim failed because the judge found the appellant did not meet the burden described in the Perren decision — the trial judge simply did not accept the appellant's evidence of his limitations and anecdotal evidence from other witnesses did not shore up his testimony.
The two female judges of the nine member court, Justice McLachlin (as she then was) and Justice L'Heureux - Dubé, concurred with Cory J. in the result, but would have gone even further in condoning the comments of the trial judge, asserting, «An understanding of the context or background essential to judging may be gained from testimony from expert witnesses in order to put the case in context...: A reasonable person far from being troubled by this process, would see it as an important aid to judicial impartiality.»
«Although certain witnesses benefit from being able to give evidence by way of a remote link to court or by way of pre-recorded testimony, generally speaking, the physical presence of victims, witnesses, juries, defendants, judges, lawyers and the public, is fundamental to our innate sense of how justice should be delivered.»
One of the long - standing principles of evidence is the rule that restricts the courts from hearing the testimony of legal experts as witnesses who can explain the law.
Though the jury sided with the doctor, the federal appeals court ordered a new trial, saying the judge erred by excluding testimony from expert witnesses.
However, if both spouses agree to the divorce and qualify for a simplified dissolution, the court hearing often does not require testimony from witnesses or discussion of evidence presented by either party.
Another phenomenon — apart from expert testimony — that is critical to getting the court to see what is actually going on in the case involves the fact witnesses.
The trial court and later the Ohio Court of Appeals based their decisions in part on testimony by an expert witness for the broker who said it was industry practice to deduct the expenses from the departing sales associate's share of compensacourt and later the Ohio Court of Appeals based their decisions in part on testimony by an expert witness for the broker who said it was industry practice to deduct the expenses from the departing sales associate's share of compensaCourt of Appeals based their decisions in part on testimony by an expert witness for the broker who said it was industry practice to deduct the expenses from the departing sales associate's share of compensation.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z