Sentences with phrase «court than freedom»
... I think this case is more important for contempt of court than freedom of expression.
http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/ Not exact matches
But serious accidents occur in plants from all over, according to more than 3,000 pages of court documents and OSHA investigative files obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.
If the GOP would quit trying to take away women's rights (as confirmed by the Supreme Court) and concentrate on FREEDOM for all, the party would gain more votes from women than they would lose from evangelicals who must have other concerns that are just as important as taking away a woman's right to chose.
Although the book is best regarded more as a presentation of the Supreme Court's religious - freedom work than as a direct study of the questions underlying that work» the work of constitutional scholars, for example, is for the most part only referenced, not engaged» it is, nonetheless, recommended.
But that freedom is just one of many that we enjoy in the United States — and religious tolerance is no more, or less, valuable than are rights to free speech, to bear arms, to be free from search and seizure, to be presumed innocent until proven otherwise, to be tried by our peers, to have our day in court, to not be imprisoned or fined without cause, to ensure State's rights, to be free from slavery and involuntary servitude, and on, and on, and on.
I am less concerned than you are that the ECHR Article nine's protection of religious freedom might be «removed» by a European Court.
Though it's set in the early 1970s and considers a freedom - of - the - press Supreme Court case involving coverage of the Vietnam War, The Post couldn't be a clearer affirmation of the Fourth Estate in the Donald Trump era — unless, possibly, it showed Richard Nixon tweeting his hatred for the media rather than spitting it into the phone in distant long shot, as director Steven Spielberg shows here.
With more than 25 years of experience successfully defending clients in state and federal courts, the Blischak Law Firm is dedicated to fighting for your rights and protecting your freedom.
So the courts must always ensure that any relief sought, while restraining objectionable conduct, goes no further than is absolutely necessary in interfering with freedom of expression.
More than three years ago the Supreme Court handed down judgment in a long - running piece of litigation under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).
In a comment made in a speech on the eve of the 2017 General Election and less than a week after the London Bridge attack, she vowed to beef up counter-terror powers by restricting «the freedom and the movements of terrorist suspects when we have enough evidence to know they present a threat, but not enough evidence to prosecute them in full in court... And if human rights laws stop us from doing it, we will change those laws so we can do it.»
Once the advocate allows himself to give up his freedom of action by permitting his decisions to be by one previously made by the executive he absolves himself from his responsibility to the courts and will become no more than an arm of the executive, and his status as a fearless and independent champion of the rights of the individual will disappear completely.
The study's author suggests various theories for the decline in the success rate, including that courts are seeking to give greater protection to freedom of expression; during the 2003 - 13 period, plaintiffs were far more successful in cases involving «new media» (email or internet), with a 62 % success rate (more than double the success rate for cases between 2003 - 13 considered as a whole).
The Court observed that in this case, focused on trade secrets, such freedom of expression concerns are more theoretical than practical but specifically noted that if freedom of expression issues arise, Google can and should apply to vary the order.
Where the district court had rejected the notion that judicial candidates ought to enjoy greater freedom to engage in partisan politics than sitting judges, the Ninth Circuit panel found the restrictions on non-judge free speech to be insufficiently narrowly tailored to hold up under strict scrutiny.
Over more than 25 years, Dan has become one of the most prominent lawyers in the country in the areas of freedom of expression and media law, and has been lead counsel on landmark Supreme Court of Canada cases.
Instead, the lower courts erroneously focused on the rights of those other than the religious freedom claimant.
Rather than sitting in a Freedom class all day, Maine drivers may take defensive driving online to satisfy Freedom courts or their insurance company.
Rather than sitting in a North Freedom class all day, Wisconsin drivers may take defensive driving online to satisfy North Freedom courts or their insurance company.
In order to give effect to the guarantee of equality, the rights of indigenous minorities, and freedom of religion, the Court should resist approaches which would effectively destroy rather than recognise and protect native title.