Sentences with phrase «courts award joint custody»

When both unmarried parents participate in the child's care, Massachusetts family courts award joint custody if both parents have been successful in maintaining joint responsibility and if the parents are able to effectively communicate with each other and make plans that are in the child's best interests.

If the court awards joint custody, both parents must jointly make decisions concerning the child's health, education and medical needs.

If the court awards joint custody to both parents, the court may award joint physical care upon the request of either parent.

The court awards joint custody when parents can cooperate in performing their responsibilities toward their child.

The court awards joint custody to parents if it finds that it works in the best interests of the child.

If the court awards joint custody, both parents must jointly make decisions concerning the child's health, education and medical needs.

Ohio, for example, provides by statute that the court awarding joint custody may decide the child's primary residence if necessary to qualify for AFDC purposes.

Not exact matches

Family courts in Illinois prefer to award parents joint legal custody, noting that joint physical custody should be determined by the parents» agreement or the court's order.

An Idaho court might award joint physical custody, joint legal custody or both based on what the court believes is in the best interests of the child.

Toward that goal, the court may award joint custody or sole custody.

A family court's award of joint custody will determine where the child will physically live and when, and the court will also make a determination regarding how major decisions regarding his health, education, and religious needs will be made.

The court may award either «sole legal custody» or «joint physical custody» if it is in the best interest of the child.

Remember, too, that the court can award joint custody even if that's not what you're asking for at this time.

Washington state custody laws also allow the courts to consider awarding joint physical custody.

A family court in Maine will award either sole custody or joint custody.

A Wisconsin court will award joint custody in cases where parents can cooperate in performing their responsibilities toward their children.

When possible, the court will award joint legal custody and / or joint physical custody.

For example, if either parent has been convicted of domestic violence, the court will usually presume that he or she should not be awarded joint custody.

While the courts in Iowa do lean toward joint custody or an arrangement that allows generous visitation, there are situations where the court will award sole custody to one parent.

The primary issue before us is whether trial court's award of joint custody is in the best interests of the Burham children.

The court may also award joint custody if one party requests joint custody and the court finds it to be in the best interests of the child.

Georgia: The court may award joint custody and may consider agreements of the parties, if they are in the best interests of the child.

If the court finds a history of domestic abuse exists, a rebuttable presumption against awarding joint custody exists.

Joint custody may be awarded in the discretion of the court.

Under Alabama law, a court may consider an award of joint custody, whereby the parental rights of both parties remain intact, with one parent as the primary custodian of the children and the other as the secondary custodian.

Even when it is determined that the child needs to spend time with both parents in order to thrive, courts are increasingly reluctant to award joint physical custody because of the disruptions it causes children.

Ultimately, a court prefers to award parents joint custody of a child.

It is very common for a court to award partial custody to both parents, otherwise known as joint custody.

If there is no agreement or if the agreement is not in the best interests of the child, the court shall award joint custody, unless custody by one parent is shown by clear and convincing evidence to serve the child's best interests.

The court may award joint legal custody with primary physical custody to one parent.

A court may award joint or sole legal custody.

I have been told that since Courts can award joint custody of children, they can do the same for pets.

A trial was held and the family court entered an order awarding joint custody and equal parenting time between Father and Mother.

The court may award either joint or sole custody in a case, based upon the best interest of the child, and may also award visitation rights to a party.

Section 63-15-230 allows the court to award either joint or sole custody as it sees fit but does not express a preference between either.

Generally, in Kentucky the Court will award either joint or sole custody.

The court has the option of awarding joint custody to both parents or sole custody to one parent.

Thus the family court did not err when awarding sole custody of the children to the mother and specifically declining to award joint custody.

In a novel and lengthy opinion, a New Jersey family court judge has awarded joint custody of a child to three people — the biological father, his same - sex spouse, and the mother.

Therefore, the court will award either sole legal decision making or joint legal decision making in a child custody case.

A court will be hesitant to award joint custody, unless it looks like you and your former spouse are able to communicate about your child and make decisions together with the child's best interests in mind.

Courts can grant sole custody, joint custody or award custody to third parties such as grandparents.

However, the Court of Appeals affirmed the family court's decision not to award Husband joint cusCourt of Appeals affirmed the family court's decision not to award Husband joint cuscourt's decision not to award Husband joint custody.

While Husband had explanations for this behavior, the Court of Appeals found this behavior mandated against an award of joint custody:

The court may award joint custody, where the parents share decision - making for the children, or sole custody, one parent having control over and parental responsibility for the care, upbringing and education of the child.

Heltzel v. Heltzel, No. 97 -000316-DM (Michigan Court of Appeals, October 23, 2001): Mother appealed the award of physical and joint legal custody of her child to her parents, the child's maternal grandparents.

After DNA testing established paternity, on Sept. 22, 2017, Judge Gregory S. Ross, 24th Circuit Court Family Division of Sanilac County, MI awarded parenting time and joint legal custody to a convicted sex offender, Christopher Mirasolo, who forcibly raped and threatened to kill the minor child's mother 9 years ago when she was 12 years of age and Mirasolo was 19 years of age.

If a parent awarded joint legal custody and physical care or sole legal custody is relocating the residence of the minor child to a location which is one hundred fifty miles or more from the residence of the minor child at the time that custody was awarded, the court may consider the relocation a substantial change in circumstances.

The Court will award joint custody when both parents are capable parents and usually they have remained on good terms and can discuss matters concerning the children in a reasonable way.

It is unlikely that a court would award joint custody to a parent (usually the father, when the mother is the primary caregiver), if there is any history of abuse in the relationship.