Sentences with phrase «courts by foreign nationals»

Not exact matches

As a federal court stated in a 2011 decision upholding the foreign national prohibition statute and regulation — a decision affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.&rcourt stated in a 2011 decision upholding the foreign national prohibition statute and regulation — a decision affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.&rCourt: «It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self - government.»

«What the United States said, and it appears in the open documents of this case, is that the disclosure of these documents by order of our courts would be «likely to result in serious damage to US national security and could harm existing intelligence information - sharing between our two governments»,» the foreign secretary said.

Staten Island Supreme Court Judge Philip Minardo rejected a lawsuit filed by two Republican Assembly members from Staten Island — Nicole Malliotakis and Ron Castorina Jr. — claiming that destruction of foreign passports and other documents in the IDNYC program would be a threat to national security.

Under cross-examination by Chris Uche, SAN, Ekuwem told the court that it was its dealer (Axxent Consulting & Infrastructure Limited) that got a contract from National Assembly to supply one Unit of VACIS (Vehicle & Cargo Inspection System) and they also sourced the foreign exchange and paid into Teledon's account.

In 2012, the Times found that a sixth of divorce cases heard by English courts involved foreign nationals.

However, it has been identified that under the Arbitration Act 1940, the national courts had an extensive supervisory role over the arbitral process and, most importantly, there were problems being faced by arbitration users in relation to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.

«Denying entry to such a foreign national does not burden any American party by reason of that party's relationship with the foreign national,» the court said.

In many respects the changing attitude toward international law, headed by the House of Lords under the unmistakable leadership of Lord Bingham, has provided an example for other national courts (NCs) to follow, starting in 2004 with the so - called Belmarsh Detainees judgment, that stunning 8 - 1 majority declaration that found the detention of foreign suspected terrorists incompatible with the Human Rights Act.

For example, ALI's current «Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law of the US» has been cited not only by US courts (including the US Supreme Court), but also by an impressive range of foreign and international courts and tribunals — including the ICJ, the international Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes («ICSID»), and UNCITRAL, as well as national courts in Canada, the UK, and Australia, among other couForeign Relations Law of the US» has been cited not only by US courts (including the US Supreme Court), but also by an impressive range of foreign and international courts and tribunals — including the ICJ, the international Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes («ICSID»), and UNCITRAL, as well as national courts in Canada, the UK, and Australia, among other couforeign and international courts and tribunals — including the ICJ, the international Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes («ICSID»), and UNCITRAL, as well as national courts in Canada, the UK, and Australia, among other countries.

Finally, Akande writes, «[o] ne further area where there is reason to be cautious about the application of international law by national courts is when those national courts seek to apply international law not against their own governments but against foreign governments.»