Sentences with phrase «courts hand down»

Governance will hand down negative consequences for noncompliance, much in the same way that the courts hand down sanctions for noncompliance.

Lawmakers pass new laws every legislative session and appellate courts hand down new appellate decisions at a rapid pace.

In addition, governance will hand out, or down, the negative consequences for noncompliance, much in the same way that the courts hand down sanctions for noncompliance.

No longer will courts hand down unintentionally conflicting decisions.»

The Supreme Court's shift away from the time - honored position of tax exemption first became apparent in 1970 when the court handed down its opinion in Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York.

On April 22, 1968, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling in the case of Interstate Circuit v. Dallas, which revolved around the film Viva Maria.

When the U.S. Supreme Court handed down Roe v. Wade, it did not even remotely envision the surgical «assembly line,» commercialization, and exploitation which thousands of women say characterize their experiences with an abortion industry intent on maximizing profits.

Guttmacher's analysis comes as Time magazine reports in its cover story this week that pro-life supporters have been winning the battle against abortion since the United States Supreme Court handed down its Roe v. Wade ruling 40 years ago.

May 17, 1954: The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, declaring segregated — «separate but equal» — public schools unconstitutional.

Now, a lively dispute has existed from the moment the Court handed down its decision in Marbury as to the scope of that ruling.

Forty years have passed since the Supreme Court handed down its Roe v. Wade decision, on January 22, 1973, and our country has never been the same since.

The Federal Court handed down its decision in ACCC v NSK Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 45 yesterday.

Justice Josephine Oyefeso of an Ikeja High Court handed down the verdict after Brown pleaded guilty to the charge.

«It also enabled the country to move on, in unity and stability, after the court handed down its verdict.»

In each prior deadlock, litigants settled, courts handed down decisions and things reached a satisfactory end point.

Biotech companies got a break today when a U.S. appeals court handed down a long - awaited ruling on gene patents in a case prompted by a suit involving Myriad Genetics of Salt Lake City.

That détente was enshrined in constitutional law in 1925, when the Supreme Court handed down Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary.

Still, no one will know for sure until the court hands down its decision, probably in May or June of this year.

The Rochester City School District and CUBE commemorated the anniversary of the year that the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown vs. the Board of Education through this online discussion.

And at the national level, the IJ intervened in the 2002 Cleveland school privatization case, Zelman v. Simmons - Harris, which resulted in the U.S. Supreme Court handing down a 5 - 4 decision that allowed for school vouchers to go to religious schools — but only if many other alternatives, including secular schools, existed as options as well.

Please join Northeast College Preparatory Academy; Rochester, NY, Central High School; Little Rock, Arkansas, and Digital Harbor High School; Baltimore, Maryland as we commemorate the anniversary of the year that the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown vs. Board of Education.

If you want to understand why a strong federal role is needed in advancing systemic reform of American public education — and why arguments for a so - called «energized retrenchment» or backsliding in that role from some conservative reformers like Andy Smarick of Bellwether Education are unconvincing — consider what happened in 1946 after the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Morgan v. Virginia.

Nearly twenty years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling that went on to protect internet - based businesses from collecting sales tax in states where they do not have a physical store or office.

Desegregation Bussing In 1954, the United States Supreme Court handed down its judgment for Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka, Kansas.

The US Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling this week.

Under a decisions that was nearly five years in the making and which overturned a Second Circuit court decision against Kirtsaeng, the Supreme Court handed down a 6 - 3 ruling in favor of a foreign student attending school in the US who was buying less - expensive textbooks through his family in his native country and selling them at a slight markup to US students.

The Court handed down its judgment on 27 October 2016, nine months after the Advocate General's (AG) Opinion was published.

The EFTA Court handed down an interesting decision in September 2012 which merits a short comment (I am grateful to Christian Frommelt for pointing me towards the case).

Yesterday, the Court handed down its decision in the much anticipated Association de Médiation Sociale case.

Last week, the Court handed down a decision on the provisions of the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons (AFMP) between Switzerland and the EU.

Earlier this month in New York, an appellate court handed down a decision broadening the liability of treating physicians when they administer medication to a plaintiff in the hospital.

In December 2016, the English High Court handed down a decision in RBS Rights Issue Litigation5 in the context of group litigation brought against RBS relating to a rights issue announced in April 2008.

Everything changed in 1977 when the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Bates.

Earlier this month, a Florida appellate court handed down a decision in an interesting nursing home negligence case, requiring the court to determine the validity of an arbitration contract signed by a deceased resident's daughter.

Last week the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in two appeals eagerly awaited by the Trusts and Estate bar: Pitt v. Holt and Futter v. Futter.

More than three years ago the Supreme Court handed down judgment in a long - running piece of litigation under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).

Ever since the Supreme Court handed down the historic decision of Carter v. Canada (Attorney General)(previously discussed here), as well as its companion decision delaying implementation for an additional four months while... read more

Samsung argues that it was Apple's choice to base its» 647 - related arguments on a broader claim construction than the one the Federal Circuit ultimately affirmed (Samsung says «Apple «shot for the moon»»), and «Apple's risk failed» when the appeals court handed down its opinion in what I always just call the «Posner case».

Mr Justice Collins in the Administrative Court handed down a judgment which dealt not only with the particular case before him, but laid down general matters of procedure for the future.

After the Court handed down the Dano case, it delivered another important ruling on welfare tourism in the Alimanovic case.

On 10 March 2010, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of Agbaje v Akinnoye - Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13 (Agbaje).

Supreme Court judgment in Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department (here) Today (25 March 2015) the Supreme Court handed down judgment in this important case concerning the interpretation of the 1954 Statelessness Convention.

Once the Court hands down a parenting or contact order, the order is legally binding and enforceable throughout Alberta.

This week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor, in which it unanimously concluded that the proposed restriction of legal aid on grounds of residence under the draft Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (Amendment of Schedule 1) Order 2014 was ultra vires the Henry VIII clause in the enabling Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012.

It includes a comprehensive commentary of relevant legislation, and analyses over 1700 decisions of the Fair Work Commission and the Courts handed down between 1 July 2009 and 31 December 2017.

On Wednesday 22nd March 2017, the Supreme Court handed down their judgment in the case of N v ACCG (2017) UKSC 22.

This site is currently suspended following the ruling of the Supreme Court handed down in the case of Unison v The Lord Chancellor on 26 July 2017 at 9.45 am.

Once the Court hands down a custody or access order, the order is legally binding and enforceable throughout Canada and may be enforced by any Superior Court Judge in any province.

R (Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39 This week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor, in which it unanimously concluded that the proposed restriction of legal aid on grounds of residence under the draft Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (Amendment -LSB-...]

On 25 October 2017 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Taurus v SOMO, allowing Taurus» appeal.