Sentences with phrase «courts in any given state»

Most people probably don't have a natural sense of the jurisdiction of each court — or even how many there are in their state — but an input like «California courts» will give you a summary of key stats about all the district courts in a given state, including a list of the largest cities in each of them.

Not exact matches

A 1992 Supreme Court ruling decreed that online vendors can sell goods without collecting sales tax, as long as they don't have a physical location in a given state.

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters)- U.S. immigration authorities have detained a 23 - year - old Mexican man who was brought to the United States illegally as a child and given a work permit during the Obama administration, according to a lawsuit challenging the detention in Seattle federal court.

On May 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York gave preliminary approval to a settlement of $ 280 million to resolve claims against JPMC that it misled investors in billions of dollars» worth of mortgage backed securities.

Heather Dietrick, Gawker's president and general counsel, says that the company's lawyers plan to review all of the documents released by the F.B.I. to see what Hogan told the F.B.I. during the extortion investigation and whether that matches the testimony he's given in his state court case again Gawker.

And the court has given states broad immunity from being sued in any court for money damages — for example, for infringing a patent or discriminating against older or disabled state employees — even though the Constitution limits this immunity only to suits in federal court by a citizen of a different state.

«Mr. Jeffs, although presumed innocent, has now been incarcerated for more than four years on charges that, given the [Utah] supreme court's opinion clarifying the law in Utah, will be difficult if not impossible for the state to sustain,» defense attorneys wrote in the motion filed in Utah's Third District Court earlier this mcourt's opinion clarifying the law in Utah, will be difficult if not impossible for the state to sustain,» defense attorneys wrote in the motion filed in Utah's Third District Court earlier this mCourt earlier this month.

(CNN)- A court in southwestern China has given heavy sentences to two ethnic Tibetans convicted of murder for «inciting» people to set themselves of fire, state media reported Thursday.

The Supreme Court gave a boost to their conviction that secularism is a genuine competing faith in the ruling in the 1961 Torcaso case, in which «Secular Humanism» was identified as a religion, and in Justice Potter Stewart's dissent in the 1963 Schempp case, which referred to a refusal to permit religious exercises in schools as not «the realization of state neutrality, but rather as the establishment of a religion of secularism.»

The decision on Friday will open marriage legally in the remaining fourteen states, and will give new legal protection for those who got married under court rulings that actually could not be considered truly final until the Supreme Court itself had decided the constitutional quescourt rulings that actually could not be considered truly final until the Supreme Court itself had decided the constitutional quesCourt itself had decided the constitutional question.

In short, states where courts have ruled on same - sex marriage are «black hole» states where few or no specific religious protections are given, according to Robin Fretwell Wilson, a University of Illinois law professor who leads a group of legal scholars that advise lawmakers on religious exemptions.

The following definition of atheism was given to the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Murray v. Curlett, 374 U.S. 203, 83 S. Ct. 1560, 10 L.Ed.2 d (MD, 1963), to remove reverential Bible reading and oral unison recitation of the Lord's Prayer in the public schools:

The State can not finance secular instruction if it permits religion to be taught in the same classroom; but if it exacts a promise that religion not be so taught — a promise the school and its teachers are quite willing and on this record able to give — and enforces it, it is then entangled in the «no entanglement» aspect of the Court's Establishment Clause jurisprudence [Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 666, 668].

Rather, the court had struck down the Rhode Island statute primarily because of its own model of church - state separation and its own unsupported views of what was likely to happen in Rhode Island parochial school classrooms — although the record gave no indication that entanglement difficulties would accompany the salary - supplement program.

The Guardian: Louisiana education case highlights Bobby Jindal's creationism state Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal is rapidly emerging as a new «moderate» Republican voice, but a court case beginning Wednesday is set to shine light on a controversial policy in his state which sees government funding given to schools that teach creationism.

GENERAL PROVISIONS By visiting this site you agree that the Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to any principles of conflicts of law, and that any action at law or in equity arising out of or relating to these Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy shall be filed only in the state or federal courts located in New York County, New York and you hereby consent and submit to the venue and personal jurisdiction of such courts for the purposes of such acState of New York, without giving effect to any principles of conflicts of law, and that any action at law or in equity arising out of or relating to these Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy shall be filed only in the state or federal courts located in New York County, New York and you hereby consent and submit to the venue and personal jurisdiction of such courts for the purposes of such acstate or federal courts located in New York County, New York and you hereby consent and submit to the venue and personal jurisdiction of such courts for the purposes of such action.

In a statement, the DORH said: «State Attorney's Office in Osijek opened the investigation against Croatian citizen (1985) due to the existence of reasonable doubt that when giving testimony before the County Court in Osijek committed a crime against justice by giving false testimony under Article 305, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code / 1In a statement, the DORH said: «State Attorney's Office in Osijek opened the investigation against Croatian citizen (1985) due to the existence of reasonable doubt that when giving testimony before the County Court in Osijek committed a crime against justice by giving false testimony under Article 305, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code / 1in Osijek opened the investigation against Croatian citizen (1985) due to the existence of reasonable doubt that when giving testimony before the County Court in Osijek committed a crime against justice by giving false testimony under Article 305, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code / 1in Osijek committed a crime against justice by giving false testimony under Article 305, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code / 11.

In 1998, the court ruled in favor of Orland Hills, stating, «Illinois case law gives preference to voluntary annexation over involuntary annexations.&raquIn 1998, the court ruled in favor of Orland Hills, stating, «Illinois case law gives preference to voluntary annexation over involuntary annexations.&raquin favor of Orland Hills, stating, «Illinois case law gives preference to voluntary annexation over involuntary annexations.»

The Appellate Division, First Department court affirmed a lower court ruling that Ming should have been given notice of the adoption petition, as he was the child's other legal parent per the key 2016 state high court decision in Brooke B. v Elizabeth C.C., another instance of a bio mom trying to cut off a nonbio mom.

However, the IGP in a press release on Thursday, April 6 stated: «We had police officers at the court and we had about 20 officers on standby but, if you remember we gave the accused persons [police] bail when they were suspects and they willingly appeared before the court, so you can imagine that the extent of danger or likelihood of they escaping was not as high as we will believe,» he explained at a press conference in Accra on Thursday, April 6.

He has admonished Mr. Anyidoho not to be «fooled» by the «unwise counsel» given by his General Secretary, Asiedu - Nketia that «any idiot can go to court in a democratic state».

In Kuric v Slovenia, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that once you have legally established permanent residency in a certain state, you keep the right of residence, even if the legal status of either your home or your host state changes and, as a result of this change, your new citizenship status alone would no longer give you a right to residencIn Kuric v Slovenia, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that once you have legally established permanent residency in a certain state, you keep the right of residence, even if the legal status of either your home or your host state changes and, as a result of this change, your new citizenship status alone would no longer give you a right to residencin a certain state, you keep the right of residence, even if the legal status of either your home or your host state changes and, as a result of this change, your new citizenship status alone would no longer give you a right to residence.

New York state lost a jurisdiction dispute with the FERC, after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit declined to review whether the federal energy regulator had big - footed the state when it gave the green light to a controversial natural gas pipeline project in Orange County.

In a celebrated case brought by a group of civil libertarians to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact»In a celebrated case brought by a group of civil libertarians to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact»in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact».

In advance of the U.S. Supreme Court's Janus decision, a provision tucked into the state budget gives public - employee unions the right to deny many services, such as free legal help, to covered employees who opt not to join or pay dues.

The Governor however, noted that the vandalised court calls for urgent rehabilitation, stating that the high court in Ilesa and others across the state will be given urgent attention in terms of rehabilitation and security.

The Padilla case in 2005 did give rise to a precedent in the United States Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit that supports the practice, although a subsequent ruling in the Al - Marri case arguably muddied the waters.

The news of Indian Point's potential closure comes weeks after the state Court of Appeals dealt Entergy a setback in its bid for a new license, interpreting state coastal water rules in a way that gave Cuomo's administration more authority over whether the plant could operate in the Hudson River.

On top of that, the Seneca Nation filed a complaint over the cigarette tax in federal court and claimed it was giving the state government until Thursday to respond to their demand to postpone its enforcement.

Now that the DADT Repeal has been implemented the The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has dismissed the Log Cabin Republican's case against «Don't Ask, Don't Tell» stating that «the repeal, in short, gave Log Cabin «everything» its complaint «hoped to achieve.

Prosecutors in Bharara's office filed court papers in two separate corruption cases giving notice that they were adding the pensions of two state senators, a city councilman and two other officials to the list of property subject to forfeiture if the officials are convicted.

The emails Cuomo sent yesterday give a very early clue to an argument he would likely make if he indeed decides to take a step onto the national stage: Under my leadership, New York led the nation on touchstone progressive issues, not only becoming the largest state in the country (before the US Supreme Court Prop. 8 decision) to legalize gay marriage, but also the first to act on gun control in the wake of the horrific Newtown massacre.

The Supreme Court has struck down a federal law that bars gambling on football, basketball, baseball and other sports in most states, giving states the go - ahead to legalize betting on sports.

Emeka Etiaba, SAN, counsel to the embattled former spokesperson of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Olisa Metuh on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 asked Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court, Abuja to order the arrest of Director General, Department of State Service, DSS, Lawal Daura, following the failure of the DSS to produce former National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki in court to give evidCourt, Abuja to order the arrest of Director General, Department of State Service, DSS, Lawal Daura, following the failure of the DSS to produce former National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki in court to give evidcourt to give evidence.

The new organization — which would be empowered by the US Supreme Court's controversial 5 - 4 «Citizens United» ruling in June, which gave corporations the green light to run «issues advertising» targeting specific candidates on TV and radio — would initially focus on state Senate races in hopes of seeing the Legislature's upper house return to Republican control, said a source familiar with the planning for the group.

He has been appointed a minister of state in the Cabinet Office and will attend the key morning and afternoon strategy meetings in Downing Street, giving Tory backbenchers reassurance that they have an ambassador at Cameron's court.

You'll remember them as the political group whose desire to run an anti-Hillary Clinton film gave the Roberts Supreme Court an opportunity to remove most practical limits on non-campaign political spending in the United States.

In seeking a court order to have Heidemann's name restored to the November ballot, Elworth's attorney, Elizabeth Eynon - Kokrda, a former adjunct professor at Creighton University School of Law, argued that the Nebraska statute doesn't give the Secretary of State any discretion regarding the state's Sept. 1 deadline for gubernatorial candidates to name their running mState any discretion regarding the state's Sept. 1 deadline for gubernatorial candidates to name their running mstate's Sept. 1 deadline for gubernatorial candidates to name their running mates.

In 2006, when I went to court, I lost at the High Court, I also lost at the Court Appeal, but Supreme Court later gave me judgement which former governor of Anambra State, Mr. Peter Obi benefitted», he maintacourt, I lost at the High Court, I also lost at the Court Appeal, but Supreme Court later gave me judgement which former governor of Anambra State, Mr. Peter Obi benefitted», he maintaCourt, I also lost at the Court Appeal, but Supreme Court later gave me judgement which former governor of Anambra State, Mr. Peter Obi benefitted», he maintaCourt Appeal, but Supreme Court later gave me judgement which former governor of Anambra State, Mr. Peter Obi benefitted», he maintaCourt later gave me judgement which former governor of Anambra State, Mr. Peter Obi benefitted», he maintained.

First, an individual can not sue a state in federal court under the Eleventh Amendment of the United States Constitution, unless the state gives consent or Congress waives immunity, which in this case did not happen.

Early in his statement of defence before the court, Shuaib had stated that Public Service Rule 030421 gave him the right to write an article.

In 1942, the Supreme Court ruled in Wickard v. Filburn that the Commerce Clause gives the United States federal government authority to regulate wheat production, even if that production is for personal consumptioIn 1942, the Supreme Court ruled in Wickard v. Filburn that the Commerce Clause gives the United States federal government authority to regulate wheat production, even if that production is for personal consumptioin Wickard v. Filburn that the Commerce Clause gives the United States federal government authority to regulate wheat production, even if that production is for personal consumption.

In a blow to de Blasio, a state court halted his plan to give certain homeowners a $ 183 credit on their water and sewer bill.

They are taking Lettre to court, claiming the rule is a violation of the New York State Constitution, in that it gives an unfair advantage to the incumbent power structure of the party committee.

However, the charge was withdrawn on a day the court earlier gave the anti-graft agency to produce its witnesses to establish that Orubebe diverted funds meant for the compensation of owners of property on Eket Urban section of the East - West Road in Eket, Akwa Ibom State.

Senators Diane Savino, Jose Peralta, Tony Avella, Jessie Hamilton, David Carlucci, Marisol Alcantara and David Valesky discuss adding the protections for a woman's right to choose abortion in the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision into state law, enacting the Dream Act, which would allow the children of undocumented immigrants to receive college aid, a law to protect the rights of transgender New Yorkers, and putting limits on the amount of money donors can give to campaigns, among other items.

Attendees to a Law Day ceremony at the New York State Court of Appeals watch as awards are given out on Monday, May 1, 2017, in Albany, N.Y. (Paul Buckowski / Times Union)

«We in the court system will be relentless in our efforts to achieve and maintain excellence throughout our court system, giving the people of New York state the level of justice services they rightfully expect and which they rightfully deserve,» DiFiore said.

The DPP urged the court to exercise its discretion in favour of the state because Aluko had given evidence under cross examination that the election which brought Fayose into power was free, fair and credible devoid of military harassment.

First he asked state workers to give up their raises, then he tried to work out a deal on lag pay, then he put furloughs in a budget bill that was eventually ruled illegal by the courts.