Not exact matches
He successfully argued that foreign and domestic investors had asserted viable «holder claims» seeking to recover investment losses due to their retention of already - owned shares in reliance upon the fraud, which is believed to be the first ruling by a U.S.
court sustaining such a theory
under English
common law.
All three cases involved a
common issue — a new definition by the Supreme
Court requiring a formal exercise of government power rather than just a meeting or phone call to prove a quid pro quo bribery scheme
under the federal
law prohibiting «honest services fraud.»
In other pollution cases, the Supreme
Court has supported suits claiming that pollution caused harm as a «nuisance»
under common law, most often interpreted to prohibit noise and light pollution.
There isn't one specific provision in the California constitution that's violated, exactly: Rather, the
court identifies three «pertinent» clauses in the constitution: a guarantee of equal protection
under the
law, a provision ordering the legislature to encourage «intellectual [and] scientific improvement,» and a requirement that the legislature «provide for a system of
common schools.»
In a Chapter 7 case, the most
common type of personal bankruptcy, the
court doesn't allow an individual to keep their assets, but most exemptions allowed
under state and federal
law are large enough to cover a secured debt such as a house mortgage a car loan.
The RDSP is not exempt from creditors by statute but a recent British Columbia Supreme
Court decision in November suggests the RDSP is covered
under common law.
In that case, the Supreme
Court ruled that companies may not be forced by the states
under common law to stop dumping harmful carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
In 2011's AEP vs. Connecticut, the Supreme
Court ruled that individuals may not file nuisance lawsuits regarding carbon emissions
under federal
common law because carbon emissions are already regulated by the Clean Air Act.
[1] Put differently, if, as the
courts have repeatedly stated, [2] the class action is only a procedural device that does not alter the substantive
law, has the payment of settlement monies to non-parties expanded the remedial choices normally available to a wronged party
under either the
common law or statute?
The issue the appellate
court examined was whether the plaintiff was prevented from obtaining damages
under common law, due to the Texas Workers» Compensation Act.
The
common law and equity
courts were merged in 1881
under the Ontario Judicature Act to create the new Supreme
Court of Ontario with two branches: the High
Court of Justice and the
Court of Appeal.
John sues for wrongful dismissal and the
court decides that
under the
common -
law, John's reasonable notice period was one year.
It follows that the issue then becomes whether the exemptions
under the
Court Rules Act can be interpreted so that they are consistent with the
common law right of access to civil justice, which is preserved, as the Attorney General submits, by the
Court Rules Act.
This was the first decision from Canada's top
court to hold that the exclusion of same - sex couples from the definition of
common law spouses violated the Charter's equality provisions
under section 15 and was not justified
under section 1.
In the recent case of Brown v. Terins, 2016 BCSC 42, the Supreme
Court of British Columbia dealt with a wills variation claim brought forward by a
common -
law spouse of the deceased
under section 60 of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act (WESA).
The
court held that whilst inadmissible
under the Road Traffic Act 1972, s 10 (3), the printout was admissible at
common law as being real evidence and had been linked to the motorist by oral evidence.
Under the
common law system, opinions from
courts above form binding precedent.
The High
Court held, applying Wyatt v Hillingdon London Borough Council (1978) 76 LGR 727, that a council's failure to comply with its statutory duty to provide domiciliary care services
under s 2 of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970 can not amount to breach of a
common law duty of care.
Their use of historical 18th century legal materials has expanded beyond the typical view of using historical
common law to maintain a conservative legal outlook, and has now covered seemingly every conceivable aspect of American federal
court practice that comes
under a historical question or issue.
The Ontario
Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding that the
common law definition of marriage offended the equality rights of gays and lesbians
under s. 15 of the Charter in a manner that could not be justified in a free and democratic society.
However, Florida Statute 768.0755 is not the only Florida
law that applies to slip and fall injuries in Florida hotels and resorts, (like slip and fall injuries in showers, tubs, pools, hot tubs, lobbies, etc.), Florida
common law created by Florida
court cases -LRB-» precedent») also applies
under the theory of premises liability.
Two further decisions impacted on the right to education: in Re JR 17 [2010] UKHL 27 (the appeal from Northern Ireland) the Supreme
Court confirmed that a school principal has no common law power to suspend a pupil from school for an alleged breach of discipline, and in A v Essex County Council [2010] UKHL 33 the court ruled (by 3 to 2) that autistic children have no absolute right to an effective education under Protocol 1 to the
Court confirmed that a school principal has no
common law power to suspend a pupil from school for an alleged breach of discipline, and in A v Essex County Council [2010] UKHL 33 the
court ruled (by 3 to 2) that autistic children have no absolute right to an effective education under Protocol 1 to the
court ruled (by 3 to 2) that autistic children have no absolute right to an effective education
under Protocol 1 to the ECHR.
Ultimately the
Court in Khadr offered a declaratory remedy to properly respect the prerogative powers of the executive, but noted that the executive is not exempt from constitutional scrutiny, even when exercising its
common law powers
under royal prerogative.
Greene has not cited — and the
Court has not found — a single statute, regulation, rule, or judicial opinion holding that a litigant has a right of access (
under the First Amendment, the
common law, or anything else) to communications between a judge and his or her
law clerk, including draft opinions and orders.
A case commonly cited on this issue is British Columbia v Henfrey Samson Belair Ltd. (1989), 59 DLR (4th) 726 (SCC)(«Samson»), where the
Court determined that if the property deemed to be in trust by the province
under the Social Service Tax Act (RSBC 1979, c 388) formed a true trust at
common law, then the property would be exempt from distribution, thereby affirming the provision in the BIA.
Likewise, from the employee's perspective, it ensures a guaranteed entitlement that may be greater than that which a
court would award
under common law.
Last year, a county
court judge ruled that personal contracts could not be assigned
under common law.
What perhaps did not receive adequate attention by the
Court of Appeal is that Obeah has an extensive history of persecution by the British Crown, specifically
under the
common law system, especially during periods of slavery and colonial discrimination.
Furthermore, in respect of the ownership of shares the
court had to consider if this issue fell within the «succession» exception in Art 1 (2)(a) of the Brussels Regulation 44/2001 or Lugano II Convention; if so, did the English
court have jurisdiction
under the
common law?
For example, an analysis of this concept in the context of random drug testing of students engaged in extracurricular activities where the school's
common law authority is balanced against constitutional concerns about privacy
under the 4th Amendment is found in the U.S. Supreme
Court case Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995).
There had been a real willingness on the part of lower
courts to rule that
under - inclusive termination provisions were unenforceable, and that employees subject to them were actually entitled to
common law notice of termination (which, again, is often far in excess of what the ESA provides for).
The Supreme
Court emphasised that, despite some
common ground, the principle of proportionality in EU
law was not expressed or applied in the same way as the proportionality principle
under the ECHR.
As far as the claims
under EU
law were concerned, it was
common ground before the
Court of Appeal that, so far as relevant to the instant case, Article 47 of the Charter had the same substantive content as Article 6 of the Convention.
Justice Gorsuch, joined by Chief Justice Roberts dissented in a very readable opinion arguing that
under English
common law, patents were dealt with by the
courts, not the Privy Council, and that the Founders understood this.
Therefore, any driver making a left turn who crashes into another vehicle may be held liable
under Florida
common law, or
court - created negligence
law, as well as statutory motor vehicle
laws.
Whether the
court possessed any
common law power to protect the anonymity of a party where rights
under the ECHR (given effect by the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA)-RRB- are engaged;
From a theoretical / policy - based viewpoint, it perhaps stands in stark contrast to a decision of the Supreme
Court of Canada a few weeks ago which ruled that
under Quebec Family
Law, it is not unconstitutional for common - law spouses to be given different rights from married couples in connection with certain specific rights arising from support upon separati
Law, it is not unconstitutional for
common -
law spouses to be given different rights from married couples in connection with certain specific rights arising from support upon separati
law spouses to be given different rights from married couples in connection with certain specific rights arising from support upon separation.
The Supreme
Court adopted the
Court of Appeal's description of the position
under standard contract
law (see Lord Clarke's judgment at para 20): ordinarily where the terms are in writing and there are no oral terms then the written terms will, prima facie, represent the whole of the parties» agreement; the parties are bound by the written terms when they sign the contract; the written terms will stand unless they do not accurately reflect what was agreed because of a mistake (generally
common to the parties); and no terms which conflict with the express terms can be implied into the contract.
Reasonable notice of termination
under the
common law (
court decisions) is often extraordinarily higher than the statutory minimums.
I would even go so far as to say that Indigenous
law is distinguishable from «Aboriginal Law» which is the source of law derived through the courts» interpretation of colonial legal instruments under common and civil law such as The Royal Proclamation of 1763, the British North American Act and the Canadian Constitution as they relate to «Aboriginal» peop
law is distinguishable from «Aboriginal
Law» which is the source of law derived through the courts» interpretation of colonial legal instruments under common and civil law such as The Royal Proclamation of 1763, the British North American Act and the Canadian Constitution as they relate to «Aboriginal» peop
Law» which is the source of
law derived through the courts» interpretation of colonial legal instruments under common and civil law such as The Royal Proclamation of 1763, the British North American Act and the Canadian Constitution as they relate to «Aboriginal» peop
law derived through the
courts» interpretation of colonial legal instruments
under common and civil
law such as The Royal Proclamation of 1763, the British North American Act and the Canadian Constitution as they relate to «Aboriginal» peop
law such as The Royal Proclamation of 1763, the British North American Act and the Canadian Constitution as they relate to «Aboriginal» people.
Next the
Court describes earlier decisions concerning the test for discrimination
under human rights legislation as «
common law elaborations of statute» (at para 50).
A family
court could find that you are separated even if you and your spouse are continuing to live
under the same roof and even if the Canada Revenue Agency has the view that you are still cohabiting together in a married or
common -
law relationship.
The
Court noted the well - established presumption that an employee whose employment is terminated without cause is entitled to
common law reasonable notice unless some other notice period, which meets the minimum entitlements
under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (the «ESA»), is clearly specified in the employment agreement, either expressly or impliedly.
The
court noted the recognition of a right to privacy
under the Charter and said the
common law should be developed in a manner consistent with Charter values.
The general
court wishes to perpetuate and reiterate the rights of the jury, as ordained
under common law and recognized in the American jurisprudence, while preserving the rights of a criminal defendant.
In its pronouncement that there are limited circumstances
under which an arbitrator's decision can be appealed to a
court, the SCC turned the
common law surrounding the interpretation of contracts on its head.
With respect to whether the
court should recognize a new common law duty of honesty in contractual performance - under the broad umbrella of the organizing principle of good faith performance of contracts Justice Cromwell held that the Court sh
court should recognize a new
common law duty of honesty in contractual performance -
under the broad umbrella of the organizing principle of good faith performance of contracts Justice Cromwell held that the
Court sh
Court should.
Other «reasonable conditions... desirable to secure the good conduct of the defendant» can be added to the recognizance, and
under subsection (3.2), the justice or summary conviction
court «shall consider whether it is desirable, in the interests of the safety» of the defendant's spouse,
common -
law partner or child, to add to the recognizance either or both of these conditions:
This means, for example, that injunctions, interim orders and other judgments obtained from foreign
courts for specific performance, payment into
court or a declaration / dismissal of a claim / counterclaim can be recognised but can not be enforced
under English
common law.
The below discusses the most
common interim orders and applications
under BC Family
Law and at the Supreme
Court: