Variance /
covariance parameters for Models 2 (age interaction models) were essentially the same as those for Models 1 and so are omitted to conserve space.
An unstructured covariance matrix was used to allow for the most flexible estimation of
covariance parameters between each level of spouse, visit, and time.
Estimating background error
covariance parameters and assessing their impact in the OSTIA system Read more»
Not exact matches
Ilin and Kaplan (2009) and Luttinen and Ilin (2009) used iterative algorithms that make use of data throughout the record to estimate the
covariance structures and other
parameters of their statistical models.
(BTW, it does look to me that acf -LRB--RRB- is called with the default type
parameter i.e. type is «correlation», not «
covariance».
if you've got a bivariate random
parameters (intercepts and age effects) up and running, and so can estimate a correlation or
covariance between initial growth rate (the tree - specific random additive effect at age = 1) and tree - specific random age coefficient across the sample, the significance of that correlation /
covariance would be a first crack at this without choosing an age at which to split the sample.
To select a small number of
parameters conveying the maximal information about the [photon] shower shape, we uncorrelated the above
parameters through a principal component analysis in which these seven
parameters are transformed into new seven uncorrelated
parameters given by the eigenvectors of the
covariance matrix.
We initially constrained corresponding path coefficients, intercepts, and
covariances to be equal for age groups and for husbands and wives and then tested whether releasing these constraints (one
parameter at a time) improved model fit.
The multivariate normal prior density of the level - 2
parameters had a mean vector of zeros and a precision matrix (the inverse of the
covariance matrix) with diagonal elements equal to 1.0 E \ -LRB-- \) 6 and off - diagonal elements equal to 0.
If the outcome did not have a normal distribution, then the
parameter estimates of the
covariance matrix were computed with robust statistics.
In these phenotypic models, the
covariances between latent growth
parameters as well as
covariances between time - specific residuals could vary across zygosity.
Second, we executed a biometric latent growth curve model where the
covariances between latent growth
parameters were replaced by a Cholesky decomposition of the variance /
covariance matrix of these
parameters (Fig 1B).
Three nested models with increased degrees of constraint were compared in multigroup analyses (fathers versus mothers): We specified a first model of configural invariance, in which the
parameters (factor loadings, item intercepts, residual variances, factor variances, and
covariance) were freely estimated in each group, whereas the factor means were constrained to zero in both groups.