Sentences with phrase «coverage is against the law»

Failure to maintain proper levels of insurance coverage is against the law in Alaska.

Driving without any insurance coverage is against the law moreover it is clearly describing you as a risky driver.

In fact, the coverage is supposed to be equivalent to that given for physical ailments, and denial of coverage is against the law, according to the act.

Not exact matches

Kimmel has since actively railed against Obamacare repeal efforts, arguing that various proposals being debated by the law's opponents would gut protections for people like Billy born with pre-existing conditions, either by rolling back Obamacare's mandated insurance benefits for certain health conditions or allowing states to set up rules that would let insurers charge sick people more for their coverage.

This may have something to do with a subconscious bias fueled by the BXNN's editor's wife throwing fundraisers for Pilgrim - Hunter: http://www.actblue.com/page/changenysen33 Of course, there is no law against this, it is just something to keep in mind when you read BXNN coverage of Pilgrim - Hunter.

The company challenged the requirement, which was part of the Affordable Care Act signed into law in 2010, on grounds that providing coverage for certain types of birth control would go against their religious beliefs.

The minimum liability coverage required by state law is very low compared to the high cost of a legal claim, especially against a business.

To defend pet owners against uninformed underwriting practices, some states have enacted laws or proposed bills to prevent insurers from denying, canceling or refusing to renew coverage to consumers after being notified of a new companion animal.

If you are in a situation in Canada or US where local laws prevent you from making a claim against the offending motorist responsible for the motor vehicle accident, you may have coverage under Inverse Liability protection.

As a personal injuries lawyer applying the laws in BC to injury cases since 1995 I can say having ICBC on both sides of a lawsuit firstly results in ICBC benefits being deducted from any claim you may have against the other party with third party liability coverage from ICBC.

From herein out, associates considering suits against their firms and law firms that are the potential subjects need to reconsider how to handle disputes in the aftermath of this kind of coverage.

Not only is driving without liability coverage financially risky, it's against the law.

While this coverage is typically associated with advisors such as accountants and consulting firms, many different types of small businesses carry this coverage to hedge against the risk of a law suit.

The minimum liability coverage required by state law is very low compared to the high cost of a legal claim, especially against a business.

Failure to carry car insurance that meets or exceeds Massachusetts's minimum coverage requirements is against the law, and it can have serious consequences.

Third - party insurance for two - wheeler riders is mandatory by the law, while one can only avail the coverage for third - party legal liabilities against the damages to someone else's vehicle.

While it is against the law in Missouri to drive without the basic coverage, most Branson residents will opt for a policy that is a little more comprehensive.

It is against the law in Tennessee to drive without basic coverage - however, most drivers will consider full coverage on top of the basic coverage requirements to ensure more comprehensive protection both on and off the roads.

Some states» laws also allow additional insurance coverage to the insured policyholder through policy stacking provisions, whereby a claim may be made against multiple uninsured motorist policies.

Not only is it against the law to drive in Greenfield, WI without basic coverage but it is also irresponsible and dangerous.

In MO, driving without coverage on your car, such as Bowling Green car insurance, is against the law.

It is against the law in Missouri to drive without at least basic Missouri automobile coverage which includes both bodily injury liability and property damage protection.

Drivers in Vermont are also required by state law to buy coverage amounts of $ 50,000 per injury and $ 100,000 per accident in uninsured and underinsured motorist insurance (UMI), as well as $ 10,000 coverage against uninsured motorist property damage.

It is against the law in Mississippi to drive without at least the basic coverage.

The minimum auto liability insurance coverage required by Tennessee state law is $ 25,000 for each person injured, and $ 50,000 per accident for bodily injury liability, plus $ 15,000 insurance coverage against property damage.

The minimum amount of auto insurance coverage required by law in the state of Alabama is $ 25,000 in Bodily or Personal Injury Protection (better known as PIP), $ 50,000 in multiple injury protection (for injury to others), and $ 25,000 in protection against property damage.

It is against the law in Mississippi to drive without at least the basic coverage; however, not only is it illegal, but it is also dangerous, irresponsible and could end up costing you a lot more than just your savings plan if you are ever in a serious accident.

While it is against the law in Mississippi to drive without a basic coverage plan, many people still do.

Even if you only drive once a week, it is against the law to drive without some level of coverage.

In Connecticut, it is against the law to drive without a minimum coverage level of bodily injury liability and property damage protection.

Every state have insurance laws that car owners have to be required to have the state minimum coverage and the drivers are indemnified against a third party responsibility.

While it is against the law in Connecticut and across the United States to drive without a minimum coverage plan, most drivers will opt for higher limits as well as optional extras when looking into Waterbury car insurance.

It is against the law in Connecticut (and across the nation) to drive without at least a minimum plan known as the 20/40/10 with 20/40 UM coverage package.

It is against the law in Connecticut to drive without the minimum basic coverage which includes bodily injury liability and property damage.

This law helps individuals keep their coverage when they need it most and not be discriminated against.

And tenants need this coverage even if it is not mandated by law because a homeowners or landlords policy does not protect our belongings, nor does it safeguard us against liability concerns.

Car insurance is required by state law in Massachusetts, and every driver has to have some minimum level of coverage against liability:

This is because it is against the law in Florida to drive without some level of coverage.

Always remember that no matter how high auto insurance premiums increase, in most states it is against the law to drive without at least minimum coverage.

Not only is it irresponsible and dangerous to drive without car coverage, but it is also against the law in the state of Florida and across the United States.

It does not matter if you only drive once in a blue moon; it is against the law across the United States to drive without at least a basic coverage plan.

Not only it is against the law to drive in the state of Florida without some level of coverage but it is also irresponsible and dangerous.

It is against the law in Florida to drive without the minimum coverage of $ 10,000 of personal injury protection and $ 10,000 of property damage coverage.

Not only is minimum coverage required by law in all states, being insured also serves as protection for the consumer against large medical expenses and legal fees, and it protects your vehicle at the price that it's worth.

Not only is it against the law in Florida to drive without some level of coverage, but it is also dangerous and could end up costing you thousands of dollars in repairs and medical expenses.

It is also important that you understand state laws and protect yourself against any potential lawsuits with the help of your coverage.

It does not matter if you drive every day or every week, it is against the law to get into your vehicle without vehicle coverage.