Sentences with phrase «coverage of court cases»

While major legal research providers have extensive coverage of court cases, their coverage is not comprehensive.

Elie and Joe complain about the media's abysmal coverage of court cases before previewing the upcoming Supreme Court Term with a real - life Supreme Court litigator, Tejinder Singh, a partner at Goldstein & Russell (http://www.goldsteinrussell.com/attorneys/tejinder-singh/) and contributor to SCOTUSBlog.

Not exact matches

Once the family broke the gag order and got some national coverage there was huge outcry from first amendment lawyers about the illegality of that order, and also others speaking out about having been legally gagged in court cases with big power differential.

The public attention given to the landmark High Court case taken by Aja Teehan and the coverage of the recent Coroner's inquest in the tragic death of baby Kai David Heneghan in Mayo have dominated the debate and have detracted from the real issues of: (i) Ireland's maternity care system being almost solely obstetric led and (ii) a woman's right to make responsible, informed choices in pregnancy and childbirth.

Rep. Diana DeGette, D - Colo., watches at right as her Co-Chair of the Pro-Choice Caucus, Rep. Louise Slaughter, D - N.Y., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 25, 2014, to discuss in the Supreme Court case on whether corporations have religious rights that exempt them from part of the law that requires coverage of birth control for employees.

«The Skeloses» guilt is generally presumed in New York and the surrounding region,» as a result of press coverage of the case — including by The Post — the court papers state.

Though it's set in the early 1970s and considers a freedom - of - the - press Supreme Court case involving coverage of the Vietnam War, The Post couldn't be a clearer affirmation of the Fourth Estate in the Donald Trump era — unless, possibly, it showed Richard Nixon tweeting his hatred for the media rather than spitting it into the phone in distant long shot, as director Steven Spielberg shows here.

Appellate - level court cases define case law, generate media coverage, influence public perceptions, and can be tracked over time as an empirical indicator of the broad parameters of court climate toward school discipline.

In a court case over the expansion of vouchers in Louisiana that garnered national media coverage, Richard coordinated with NSBA resulting in the filing of an amicus (friend of the court) brief.

That's great, but if that does not stop the homeowner there, the inspector should be prepared to prove his case in court and it may be without the help of his insurance carrier if he did not purchase that specific coverage.»

That's great but if that does not stop the homeowner there, the inspector may have to be prepared to prove his / her case in court, and it may be without the help of their insurance carrier if he did not purchase that specific coverage.»

The creation of three designated broadcast rooms — for the provincial, superior, and appeal court — is part of a pilot project designed by the province's three chief justices and intended to «create a comfort level» with media in order to facilitate coverage of cases that have strong public interest and educational aspects.

One being an appeal case before the Eastern High Court of Denmark regarding coverage according to an all - risk insurance policy.

As part of this push into enhanced legal coverage, the company recently launched a new offshoot devoted to covering the Supreme Court's 2011 - 2012 term, called Case by Case: The U.S. Supreme Court.

Additional coverage of the trial court's ruling in this case can be accessed via Citizen Media Law Project, «Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions,» and law professor Eric Goldman's «Technology & Marketing Law Blog.&rcourt's ruling in this case can be accessed via Citizen Media Law Project, «Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions,» and law professor Eric Goldman's «Technology & Marketing Law Blog.&rCourt Decisions,» and law professor Eric Goldman's «Technology & Marketing Law Blog.»

In the recent months there has been a high level of media coverage on this topic following the European Court of Justice (ECJ) giving judgement in two cases relating to Muslim women whose employment was terminated because of their insistence on wearing headscarves in the workplace: Achbita and Anor v G4S Secure Solutions; and Bougnaoui and Anor v Micropole.

Indiana Supreme Court adopts case - by - base approach to admission of coverage limits in UM / UIM cases Lewis Wagner Insurance Law Alert State Farm Mutual Insurance Co..

Will, the managing partner of Will Davidson LLP, argued the seminal case in the area at the Supreme Court of Canada, when the nation's top court reinstated a jury award of $ 1 million to homeowners denied coverage following a 1994 fire that destroyed their Court of Canada, when the nation's top court reinstated a jury award of $ 1 million to homeowners denied coverage following a 1994 fire that destroyed their court reinstated a jury award of $ 1 million to homeowners denied coverage following a 1994 fire that destroyed their home.

The Court found that the interpretation of insurance contracts involves a unique blend of the general principles of interpretation applicable to all contracts and the unique principles applicable in the insurance setting.22 While courts have found that the «language of the policy» is the most important factor in determining whether coverage is granted or excluded, courts have found that where there is genuine ambiguity or doubt, the duty to defend ought to be resolved in favour of the insured.23 Similarly other insurance law principles should be considered, such as the principle that coverage provisions should be construed broadly and exclusion clauses should be construed narrowly.24 It was this last principle that the Court looked to in making a decision in this case.

On behalf of several insurance carriers, we argued that the New York action was the first filed action, that the league was not a California resident, and that the lower court properly stayed the case pending the outcome of the New York coverage action.

Nonetheless, other observers — to which I would count myself — have rather read the decision as the confirmation of the principles laid out by the Court in its previous jurisprudence on the topic (see also the coverage of the case on this blog).

Now, after six years of litigation — including a hard - fought appeal to the state's highest court over applicability of the defendant's insurance coverage — the trial judge has preliminarily approved a settlement of the case worth $ 1.8 million.

But the verdict was reduced by the procedural hodgepodge of Maryland Code § 5 - 524 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article that limits the sovereign immunity waiver to the available insurance coverage in car accident cases.

Lead trial counsel for plaintiffs in both the preliminary and final injunction hearings of Evans v. Romer, a successful suit challenging the constitutionality of a widely - publicized amendment to Colorado's constitution that would have prohibited any legislation protecting against discrimination based on sexual orientation; case received nationwide press coverage in broadcast and print media, including live coverage on Court TV, and was ultimately decided in plaintiffs» favor in the U. S. Supreme Court.

For a case law database, «comprehensive» means that within our continuous coverage (which is clearly stated) we have all the judgments which can be identified by one of these four approaches: — The court website (when applicable); — The neutral citation (some courts use a strict sequence of numbers); — The citations found in the Reflex set of 33 report series; — The citations found in CanLII documents.

Obtained decision by the Connecticut Supreme Court on behalf of a surety limiting scope of coverage of a subdivision development surety bond in a case of first impression.

In early news coverage, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that «Abortion Case Dropped as High Court Leaves Law Voided» and «Firearm Ban After Assault Left Intact by U.S. High Court.»

The Travelers Companies et al. 172 Conn App 717 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2017) Represented defendant insurer in case involving allegations by a former insured in connection with the insurer's denial of coverage for a fire loss and the insurer's subsequent testimony at the insured's divorce proceedings concerning the basis for the denial.

EVA's coverage of cases includes all U.S. federal and state courts, Arruda said.

Mew successfully represented Lloyd's Underwriters in its 2009 case at the Supreme Court of Canada versus Teck Cominco Metals Ltd., which sued its insurers over coverage in relation to damage caused downstream from a British Columbia smelter.

«The keys to successfully litigating these issues for policyholder counsel are: (i) focus on the policy language; (ii) think about what happens if the policyholder wins the liability case; (iii) considering the overwhelmingly common practice of carriers» funding the defense, argue that the burden of dispelling the expectation of coverage is on the carrier to negate defense coverage; and (iv) recognize that while the incurrence of defense costs can be a catastrophic exposure to the policyholder it can also be so for the carrier, meaning that the policyholder must sensitively respond to the equitable force of the insurer's arguments and not simply rely on «punish the drafter» arguments or what the Nabisco court characterized as» «mom and pop» grocery store argument [s]» (unless one has to).

As an example, Lithwick writes that last weekend at a conference sponsored by the National Italian - American foundation, Scalia criticized the quality of media coverage of Supreme Court cases, asserting that «The press is never going to report judicial opinions accurately.»

The Reno Gazette - Journal today provides extensive coverage: «Police link judge shooting with homicide; suspect still missing ``; «Violence a key topic when judges gather ``; «Judge wants bulletproof windows; officials study tinted films, cite cost ``; «Weller handled hundreds of cases involving divorce ``; «Wedding party mistakes «pop» for champagne cork ``; «Potential violence surrounds family court cases, lawyers say ``; «Downtown restaurant in middle of action ``; and «Police continue search for shooting suspect.»

NEW: Law profs Steven Schwinn and Ruthann Robson provide same - day coverage and analysis of the most newsworthy constitutional law cases at the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals and state supreme court leCourt, U.S. Court of Appeals and state supreme court leCourt of Appeals and state supreme court lecourt levels.

As many Slaw readers will already know from the extensive coverage this has received, the Ontario Divisional Court released an important ruling in Warman v. Wilkins - Fournier, a case in which Richard Warman is suing a number of persons for defamation.

He has been involved in more than 40 insurance - related appeals, including recently successfully arguing the first Hurricane Sandy - related insurance coverage case heard by the New Jersey Supreme Court and a case in the First Circuit establishing the law on critical issues of liability insurance coverage.

Courtney Culver Baker has experience throughout the State of Texas in both state and federal courts, as well as the Fifth Circuit, representing corporate, not - for - profit and individual clients both in pursuing and defending cases in areas including business and contract disputes, real estate, catastrophic personal injury, ad valorem taxation, securities disputes, insurance coverage, professional liability and trademark infringement.

The weight that the court, in the exercise of its discretion under Rule 12 (6), gives to the loss of insurance coverage as a potential disadvantage that the other spouse may suffer as a result of the early severing of the claim for divorce depends on the evidence in the particular case.

A trial lawyer at Robinson + Cole since 1980 with a focus on insurance coverage and class action litigation, Mr. Goldman has tried approximately 30 cases to conclusion in a wide range of jurisdictions throughout the United States, has handled numerous federal and state appeals in multiple jurisdictions, including the Supreme Court of the United States, and has served as lead counsel in many cases that have had high national visibility.

Whether or not your case settles out of Court of not depends on a variety of factors, including but not limited to liability, damages, causation, pre-accident health, insurance coverage issues, credibility of the Plaintiff, likeability of the Plaintiff and which insurer you are dealing with.

This company, Maritime Law Book (MLB), had national coverage of all court levels, a decades - deep topic database modeled on the West Key Number System, and relationships with courts to continue receiving new cases.

The Ontario Court of Appeal found that the Application Judge's reasons were insufficient, as they did not conduct the required analysis of the pleadings, the Maintenance Contract and the Intact Policy, in order to address the issues relevant to the determination of coverage in this case.

The Court of Appeal's decision in this case is noteworthy for the court's reliance on the context under which the insurance policy was issued, and the purpose for which the insured obtained coverage — rather than the wording of the policy itself — in interpreting the poCourt of Appeal's decision in this case is noteworthy for the court's reliance on the context under which the insurance policy was issued, and the purpose for which the insured obtained coverage — rather than the wording of the policy itself — in interpreting the pocourt's reliance on the context under which the insurance policy was issued, and the purpose for which the insured obtained coverage — rather than the wording of the policy itself — in interpreting the policy.

About Site - Whether you are a lawyer, law student, or just interested in the U.S. Supreme Court, SCOTUS blog, now in its tenth year, provides comprehensive coverage of the Court and its cases.

Tony Mauro of American Lawyer Media gave insights into the working of the Supreme Court, coverage of recent high - profile cases, and the best way to approach Tony on using our «insiders».

We have also litigated insurance coverage cases at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and Ontario Court of Appeal, addressing a diverse range of coverage issues.

People are not serving on juries, the media's coverage of the courts is shrinking, and America's common law is not developing on a case - by - case basis, as it has for two centuries.

This case takes up most of this column, but it also contains briefer coverage of another much awaited Supreme Court case, this time on how statutory holidays apply to offshore workers (and possibly to others with unusual working patterns), and an important Court of Appeal decision on a tricky point of TUPE law, arising where there are contemporaneous administration proceedings (often in so - called «pre-pack» cases).

I am envisioning a simple tool that would indicate their coverage of various courts over time, so one could know at a glance which database to consult for finding a particular case.

For me this is still a bit of a head scratcher: the engineering is highly sophisticated but the coverage is so spotty as to make it of small use in many cases; certainly someone in Ontario, for example, is unlikely to get much joy from it, given the absence of trial court judgments.