Sentences with phrase «covered by the court order»

Will white students in schools covered by the court order be able to take full advantage of the vouchers?

Not exact matches

He said that Burroughs had been sworn in before Circuit Court Judge Arthur Dunne issued a stay order on Washington appointments that were approved May 9 by the City Council and that the Netsch appointment, approved June 6, was not covered by the order and not subject to a legal challenge.

By Elvis DARKO, Accra THE order by the Supreme Court that the agreement covering the hosting of two Guantanamo Bay (GITMO) detainees should be sent to parliament for retrospective approval immediately shifts the spotlight on this controversial matter to Members of Parliament (MPsBy Elvis DARKO, Accra THE order by the Supreme Court that the agreement covering the hosting of two Guantanamo Bay (GITMO) detainees should be sent to parliament for retrospective approval immediately shifts the spotlight on this controversial matter to Members of Parliament (MPsby the Supreme Court that the agreement covering the hosting of two Guantanamo Bay (GITMO) detainees should be sent to parliament for retrospective approval immediately shifts the spotlight on this controversial matter to Members of Parliament (MPs).

The NAEP scores they focus on do not correspond in most of the cases to the relevant years in which the court orders were actually implemented; they ignore the fact that, as in Kentucky, initial increases in funding are sometimes followed by substantial decreases in later years; and their use of NAEP scores makes no sense in a state like New Jersey, where the court orders covered only a subset of the state's students (i.e., students in 31 poor urban school districts) and not the full statewide populations represented by NAEP scores.

The General Attorney occupation covers professional legal positions involved in preparing cases for trial and / or the trial of cases before a court or an administrative body or persons having quasi-judicial power; rendering legal advice and services with respect to questions, regulations, practices, or other matters falling within the purview of a Federal Government agency (this may include conducting investigations to obtain evidentiary data); preparing interpretative and administrative orders, rules, or regulations to give effect to the provisions of governing statutes or other requirements of law; drafting, negotiating, or examining contracts or other legal documents required by the agency's activities; drafting, preparing formal comments, or otherwise making substantive recommendations with respect to proposed legislation; editing and preparing for publication statutes enacted by Congress, opinions or discussions of a court, commission, or board; drafting and reviewing decisions for consideration and adoption by agency officials.

a) Disputes filed - 18 months b) Inquiries - 2 years c) Payment profile -5 years d) Information related to a consumers payment behavior such as slow payer, defaulted or absconded - 1 year e) Information relating to the action that a credit provider has taken against a consumer to enforce a debt such as handed over, legal action or write - off - 2 years f) Debt restructuring - Until a clearance certificate is given g) Civil court judgments - 5 years or until the court removes it h) Administration orders (orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt judgments - 5 years or until the court removes it h) Administration orders (orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt removes it h) Administration orders (orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South AfCourt order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Africa.

A consolidated attachment of earnings order means one monthly payment is deducted by your employer to cover all the CCJs and sent to the court.

As the Supreme Court in Morguard emphasized, however, the Act does not in any way limit the far larger application of comity in regard to orders and judgments not covered by the Act (i.e. non-money judgments or foreign judgments other than those select U.S. states).

The framework advocated by leave campaigners actually would follow this route of amending the Act, but in order to cover aspects such as ending the Court of Justice of the European Union's jurisdiction and to re-impose immigration controls before the use of Article 50 and the eventual repeal of the Act.

The Court suggested that the non-publication order in the present case be scaled back (by agreement of the parties) as it unnecessarily covered information that would not have a negative impact on fair trial rights, i.e. background information that is readily available to and known to the public.

There are also probably some «local rules» in each court addressing issues such as the mailing address and operating hours of the court, the way that hearing dates are scheduled, the process by which motions are considered, the duty if any of parties to confer with each other or engaged in ADR, mandatory pre-trial disclosure obligations, civil cover sheets for new cases, standard deadlines to finish tasks that don't have deadlines in the general application civil rules, preferred forms for certain kinds of motions and orders such as entries of appearance, etc..

(2) If these rules do not cover a matter adequately, the court may give directions and make any order that is just, and the practice shall be decided by analogy to these rules, by reference to the Courts of Justice Act and the Act governing the action and, if the court considers it appropriate, by reference to the Rules of Civil Procedure.

If you are not sure, then it's a good idea to consult the statute of frauds, which covers when a contract must be in writing in order to be enforceable by a court.

[x] Justice Newbould found that the Canadian Court had broad inherent jurisdiction to «do what is just in the circumstances» and make orders as required to fill in gaps or lacunae not covered by specific provisions in the CCAA, pursuant to section 11 of the CCAA.

In C Plc v P (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening)[2007] EWCA Civ 493, [2007] 3 All ER 1034, the Court of Appeal found that where self - incriminating, independent materials had been discovered, following the execution of a search order, and had been handed over to a computer expert by the solicitor supervising the search order, they were not covered by the privilege against self - incrimination.

it is for the national court, in order to ensure effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU environmental law, to interpret its national law in a way which, to the fullest extent possible, is consistent with the objectives laid down in Article 9 (3) of the Aarhus Convention.

In Lenz v Sculptoreanu, supra at paras 25 - 30, the Court of Appeal noted that restraining orders are available to those in dating relationships, who are not covered by the PAFVA.

Family relationships covered by the definition of «family member» in the PAFVA include current and former spouses, adult interdependent partners, others residing (or formerly residing) in intimate relationships, persons who are parents of one or more children, regardless of whether they have ever lived together, persons who reside together where one of them has care and custody over the other under a court order, and generally, those related to each other by blood, marriage, adoption, or adult interdependent relationships, as well as children in the care and custody of the above persons (PAFVA section 1 (1)(d)-RRB-.

In an admiralty action in rem and in personam, Lakeland Bank v. Never E Nuff (Ship), 2016 FC 1096, the Federal Court dismissed the action in personam on a US mortgage, registered in New York State, against the mortgagor, a U.S.based former owner of a 38 - foot pleasure craft and against its innocent purchaser for value without notice in Canada and dismissed the purchaser's counterclaim for abuse of process, but ordered the return of a trailer and other personal items, which had been arrested in Canada with the pleasure craft, but were not covered by the mortgage.

She states: «A social media user who is aware of the injunction posts the name of someone whose anonymity is covered by the order commits a criminal contempt of court, he explained.

Date — Bah JSC in this case stated that: «what is intended to be covered by Order 81 are irregularities, short of situations of want of jurisdiction or infringements of statutes other than the High Court Rules... thus, whilst Order 81 rule 1 treats non compliance with the Rules as not nullifying the non - complying proceedings, the rule DOES NOT apply to non — compliance which is so fundamental as to go to Jurisdiction, or which is in breach of a Statute other than the civil procedure rules; breach of the Constitution; or the breach of the rules of natural justice.»

- Provide expressly that a representation order for proceedings in the Crown Court, including orders which extend to that court from a magistrates» court such as committals for sentence, covers representation by a junior advocate (reCourt, including orders which extend to that court from a magistrates» court such as committals for sentence, covers representation by a junior advocate (recourt from a magistrates» court such as committals for sentence, covers representation by a junior advocate (recourt such as committals for sentence, covers representation by a junior advocate (reg 7).

An LSPO may provide for amounts to be payable in instalments or by way of a lump sum, perhaps with an interim order for sale, and the court has considerable flexibility over the scope / nature of the legal services to be covered and the duration of the order.

If the request for disclosure of protected health information were not accompanied by a court order, covered entities could not have disclosed the information requested unless a request authorized by law had been made by the agency requesting the information or by legal counsel representing a party to litigation, with a written statement certifying that the protected health information requested concerned a litigant to the proceeding and that the health condition of the litigant was at issue at the proceeding.

Under the NPRM, if the request for disclosure of protected health information was accompanied by a court order, a covered entity could have disclosed that protected health information which the court order authorized to be disclosed.

Response: Under the final rule, if the disclosure is pursuant to an order of a court or administrative tribunal, covered entities may disclose only the protected health information expressly authorized by the order.

Paragraph § 164.512 (f)(1) of this section permits a covered entity to make disclosures that are required by other laws, such as state mandatory reporting laws, or are required by legal process such as court orders or grand jury subpoena.

Covered entities may also disclose protected health information in response to a subpoena, discovery request, or other lawful process without a court order, but only if the covered entity receives satisfactory assurances that the party seeking disclosure has made reasonable efforts to ensure that the individual has been notified of the request or that reasonable efforts have been made by the party seeking the information to secure a qualified protectiveCovered entities may also disclose protected health information in response to a subpoena, discovery request, or other lawful process without a court order, but only if the covered entity receives satisfactory assurances that the party seeking disclosure has made reasonable efforts to ensure that the individual has been notified of the request or that reasonable efforts have been made by the party seeking the information to secure a qualified protectivecovered entity receives satisfactory assurances that the party seeking disclosure has made reasonable efforts to ensure that the individual has been notified of the request or that reasonable efforts have been made by the party seeking the information to secure a qualified protective order.

By restricting disclosure of protected health information to only that information specified in a court or administrative order or released pursuant to other types of lawful process only if the individual had notice and an opportunity to object or if the information was subject to a protective order, individuals who are concerned about disclosure of information concerning third parties will have the opportunity to raise that Start Printed Page 82677issue prior to the request for disclosure being presented to the covered entity.

In the NPRM we would have allowed covered entities to disclose protected health information in the course of any judicial or administrative proceeding: (1) In response to an order of a court or administrative tribunal; or (2) where an individual was a party to the proceeding and his or her medical condition or history was at issue and the disclosure was pursuant to lawful process or otherwise authorized by law.

Thus, in the final rule we provide that a covered entity may disclose protected health information in response to a subpoena, discovery request or other lawful process that is not accompanied by a court order if it receives satisfactory assurance from the party seeking the request that the requesting party has made a good faith attempt to provide written notice to the individual that includes sufficient information about the litigation or proceeding to permit the individual to raise an objection to the court or administrative tribunal and that the time for the individual to raise objections has elapsed (and that none were filed or all have been resolved).

However, you should be aware that any such order is at the discretion of the Court and, in any event, will only generally cover a proportion of the fees and disbursements actually incurred by you.

(i) In response to an order of a court or administrative tribunal, provided that the covered entity discloses only the protected health information expressly authorized by such order; or

Under the final rule, covered entities may disclose protected health information in compliance with and as limited by relevant requirements of: a court order or court - ordered warrant, or a subpoena or summons issued by a judicial officer.

Under the final rule, covered entities may disclose protected health information in response to a court or administrative order, provided that only the protected health information expressly authorized by the order is disclosed.

Some commenters suggested that if a subpoena for disclosure is not accompanied by a court order, the covered entities be prohibited from disclosing protected health information unless the individual has been given notice and an opportunity to object.

However, we note that the final rule limits the permitted disclosures by covered entities in court or administrative proceedings to only that information which is specified in the order from a court or an administrative body should provide a degree of protection for individuals from unnecessary disclosure.

In § 164.512 (e) of the final rule, we permit covered entities to disclose protected health information in a judicial or administrative proceeding if the request for such protected health information is made through or pursuant to an order from a court or administrative tribunal or in response to a subpoena or discovery request from, or other lawful process by a party to the proceeding.

Unlike administrative subpoenas, where there is no independent review of the order, court orders are issued by an independent judicial officer, and we believe that covered entities should be permitted under this rule to comply with them.

Additionally, a covered entity may disclose protected health information for judicial and administrative proceedings in response to an order of a court or administrative tribunal provided that the disclosure is limited to only that information that is expressly authorized by the order.

For instance, in response to an order of a court or administrative tribunal, the covered entity may disclose only the protected health information that is expressly authorized by such an order.

You can choose to attend traffic school via mail by sending a self - addressed letter as per the courtesy notice specifications with a check / money order for the fine / bail amount as well as a separate check covering the administrative fee of $ 69 (non-refundable) made payable to the «Superior Court».

Our programs will cover everything required by the state or court in order to receive credit for completion.

Child maintenance aids in covering necessary living expenses for the child and is ordered by the courts after review is conducted of each parent's individual income earnings.

For example, the bodies have to get across all the claims, from regions they previously didn't cover, quickly enough to address court orders and ensure the claims aren't struck out by the Court for a failure to comply with the orcourt orders and ensure the claims aren't struck out by the Court for a failure to comply with the orCourt for a failure to comply with the orders.

Know that if the mediator is ordered by the court to testify about information covered during mediation — or to provide documents related to the mediation — he or she should inform you.

A temporary family law order is usually the type of restraining order most people use during divorce, and it encompasses many areas not covered by the other kinds of court orders.

Any health care for the child, whether covered by insurance or not, must be approved in advance, in writing, by both parents or by prior court order if it would result in an actual out - of - pocket expense of over $ 100 to the parent who did not incur or consent to the expense.