Sentences with phrase «covered under your premises»

Slip and fall accidents are covered under premises liability law, which governs cases associated with injuries occurring on another person's property.

Not exact matches

I say this to: 1) refute the stupidity of the people still operating under the premise that Dantonio and Izzo covered anything up.

(His presentation also covers stats on self - publishing, and addresses other issues including DRM under the general premise, «what are a few things that would be helpful to know if you were not a big publisher?»)

If a civil authority prohibits you from use of the «residence premises» as a result of direct physical damage to neighboring premises caused by a Peril Insured Against under this policy, we cover resulting

Damage from a pet of any kind to the premises is not covered under any renters insurance policy.

In addition, we clarify that if the assigned work station of persons under contract is on the covered entity's premises and such persons perform a substantial proportion of their activities at that location, the covered entity may choose to treat them either as business associates or as part of the workforce, as explained in the discussion of the definition of business associate.

If you have property stored off premises in a storage bin, it would still be covered under your renters policies up to a certain amount.

It is also covered under most renters policies to protect all contents on the premises.

Fire damage to rented premises for which you are legally liable under common law (not because of a contract) is covered under Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability.

This policy also has an additional section six, under which the residential premises is cover on Complete Sum Insured Basis.

If a civil authority prohibits you from use of the «residence premises» as a result of direct physical damage to neighboring premises caused by a Peril Insured Against under this policy, we cover resulting

The technical answer to what is loss of use coverage on Manhattan, NY renters insurance is «If a loss by a peril insured against under this policy to covered property or the building containing the property makes the residence premises not fit to live in, we cover at your choice either of the following:... any necessary increase in living expenses incurred by you so that your household can maintain its normal standard of living; or... the fair rental value of that part of the residence premises where you reside...»

Damage from a pet of any kind to the premises is not covered under any renters insurance policy.

Items stolen on vacation: Your belongings should be covered wherever you go by a homeowners policy, including on vacation under an «off - premises» provision.

L.B. Kaye International Realty Commercial Svcs., Inc. v. 100 Varick Realty (15 A.D. 3d 176) judgment awarding plaintiff real estate broker damages in the principal amount of $ 133,761.00 affirmed; appellate court does not disturb trial court's finding that defendant intentionally excluded broker from exercising the exclusive leasing rights it obtained under the brokerage agreement thereby entitling broker to full commission when defendant leased the premises covered by the agreement on its own.

2d 651)-- remedies provision of the Property Condition Disclosure Act are unenforceable beyond the requirement to give a $ 500 credit at closing should the seller refuse to provide the form, thereafter, common law or statutory remedies, if any, are available; information contained in the disclosure statement survives neither contract nor closing; seller answering «unknown» on the disclosure form triggers a duty to inquire on the part of the buyer and relieves the seller of any potential liability for defects that arise in regard to the part of the premises covered by the question; any information disclosed during the sale of the property merges into the contract and does not exist on its own basis of a common law cause of action; buyer's action based on breach of the disclosure statement is dismissed on the grounds that no such cause of action is created by RPL Article 14; buyer's relief exists under common law contract theories and buyers have not proven their prima faciecase under those theories