In Tuesday's
ruling, a three - judge
appellate panel rejected Pauley's narrow definition of «repeat infringer» as only
covering users who upload infringing content, rather than ones who downloaded songs for personal entertainment.
A federal
appellate court has
ruled that although one section of a homeowner's insurance policy stated that it didn't
cover mold loss, the homeowners may be
covered for their loss, since another section of the policy didn't specifically state a mold exclusion.