Sentences with phrase «crash prevention system as»

ARLINGTON, Va. — The Subaru Impreza, previously a Top Safety Pick award winner, moves up to 2014 Top Safety Pick + with the addition of a superior - rated front crash prevention system as an option on the 2015 model.

The Institute rates models with optional or standard front crash prevention systems as superior, advanced or basic depending on whether they offer autonomous braking, or autobrake, and, if so, how effective it is in tests at 12 and 25 mph.

Not exact matches

The requirements for front crash prevention systems also became tighter for 2016, as TSP + winners must earn either an «Advanced» or a «Superior» rating.

The Sorento only offers a front collision warning system, while the IIHS» new criteria requires either an «Advanced» or «Superior» rating from frontal crash prevention systems, meaning that the vehicle must have some active element such as collision mitigation braking.

The IIHS gave the 2015 Outlander the «Top Safety Pick +» rating, with the model getting the top «Good» rating for all criteria, as well as the «Advanced» rating for front crash prevention thanks to the optional Forward Collision Mitigation System.

Crash avoidance technology, such as front crash prevention systems, should help offset some of the effects of distracted driving as these systems make their way into more vehicles on the road.

«Just as forward collision warning systems that include autonomous braking cut crashes more sharply than those that don't, lane departure prevention systems that don't rely on a driver's response may hold more promise than the systems HLDI has looked at so far,» says David Zuby, the Institute's chief research officer.

So, for example, the Subaru Outback can be advertised as earning the Top Safety Pick Plus rating, even though much of the inventory on its dealers» lots are not actually TSP + eligible because the forward crash prevention system is not included on top - selling trims.

It coupled a score of acceptable or better in the small front overlap test with at least the OPTION of an automated frontal crash prevention system on that model as the minimum bar to receive TSP +.

Twenty - seven percent of 2015 models offer a front crash prevention system with autobrake, more than twice as many as in the 2012 model year.

The front crash prevention features of the Top Safety Pick + winners run the gamut from basic warning systems, such as those offered on the Ford Fusion, Lincoln MKZ and Honda's four winners, to Subaru's EyeSight warning and autobrake system.

On top of that, the GLC SUV also offers a standard COLLISION PREVENTION ASSIST PLUS system, which was rated as «superior» in front crash pPREVENTION ASSIST PLUS system, which was rated as «superior» in front crash preventionprevention.

The vehicle must also have a front crash prevention system that earns a superior or advanced rating, as well as good - rated headlights.

Under the three - tier rating program, models with optional or standard front crash prevention systems are rated as superior, advanced or basic.

Cutting edge crash prevention technologies fitted to the mid-size General Motors pickups include forward collision and lane departure warning systems, which are offered as optional equipment.

It also must have a front crash prevention system that earns a superior or advanced rating, as well as good - rated headlights.

For front crash prevention, the model was given the «Basic» rating as it lacks low - speed and high - speed auto brake systems.

To assist consumers, IIHS lists the manufacturer's name — or one of the names — for the system, as well as the package name, for each vehicle rated for front crash prevention.