A Top Safety Pick + car must meet the same requirements, but must also be equipped with front
crash prevention technology such as warning systems or automatic braking to be considered.
The vehicle was one of only two minivans to be named a 2016 IIHS Top Safety Pick, when equipped with the proper
frontal crash prevention technology, and it achieves some of the most impressive fuel efficiency numbers of any minivan as well.
Unlike the Q3, the 2016 Audi Q5 features optional
crash prevention technology like forward collision warning and low - speed autobrake, which helped it earn the highest rating possible of Top Safety Pick Plus.
Cutting
edge crash prevention technologies fitted to the mid-size General Motors pickups include forward collision and lane departure warning systems, which are offered as optional equipment.
«This collaborative process should continue without Congressionally - imposed deadlines, restrictive parameters or political pressure that creates regulatory uncertainty and could delay bringing these life -
saving crash prevention technologies to consumers,» ITS - America CEO and President Thomas Kern said.
The GLE also comes equipped with the proper
frontal crash prevention technology, as well as PRE-SAFE, which will actually prepare the vehicle for a crash before it even happens.
Requirements for the Top Safety Pick + award include «Good» ratings in the IIHS» moderate overlap front, side, roof strength, and head restraint tests; either a «Good» or «Acceptable» rating in the difficult small overlap front crash test» and at least a «Basic» rating for
front crash prevention technology.
All three vehicles earned «Good» scores in all crash categories and «Superior» ratings in front
crash prevention technology.
It also earned IIHS» highest rating of superior for its front
crash prevention technology.
Without any available front
crash prevention technology, the Audi Q3 lost out on a chance to earn the coveted Top Safety Pick + designation.
It's comprised of top crash test scores and an evaluation of a vehicle's front
crash prevention technology.
Additionally, the previous IS received praise from the IIHS for
its crash prevention technology, so seeing as it's now standard, the new version should receive similar — if not better — marks.
In the under - $ 30,000 group, the ForTwo remains atop the best list, followed by the Jeep Wrangler small SUV (the two - door, short - wheelbase, four - wheel drive version), the midsize Subaru Outback, both with and without EyeSight, Subaru's front
crash prevention technology; and the Ram 1500 long - wheelbase four - wheel drive.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) named the 2016 F - 150 Crew Cab and Extended Cab Top Safety Picks when equipped with optional front
crash prevention technology.
It achieved their highest rating of Good in all crash tests and for its LATCH child safety seat anchors and a top rating of Superior for front
crash prevention technology.
According to The News Wheel, the Outlander won the award when it was equipped with front
crash prevention technology and specific headlights, features every driver should consider.
Without the front
crash prevention technology, the vehicle would simply be a Top Safety Pick.
When this minivan is equipped with front
crash prevention technology, it is an IIHS Top Safety Pick.
It also received a top rating of Superior for optional front
crash prevention technologies.
«Consumers who want
both crash prevention technology and the latest in occupant protection have a fair number of vehicles to choose from,» Lund says.
ARLINGTON, Va. — Twenty - two vehicles earn the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's highest safety award for 2014, Top Safety Pick +, thanks to a high level of protection in crashes and the availability of front
crash prevention technology to avoid many collisions in the first place.
It's an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety 2017 Top Safety Pick with a top rating of Good in all crash tests and Superior for front
crash prevention technologies.
To earn the 2016 Top Safety Pick + ranking, a vehicle must not only score a best possible Good score in all crash safety tests, it must also offer sophisticated front
crash prevention technology.
It scored a Good in all crash tests and a Superior for front
crash prevention technologies, which was enough to earn it a Top Safety Pick + rating.
It received a Good rating in all crash tests and a Superior rating for front
crash prevention technologies.
It gets good fuel economy with an EPA - estimated 36 mpg highway and is an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Top Safety Pick + with a Good rating in all crash tests and a Superior rating for available front
crash prevention technology.
It was named a Top Safety Pick + by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety with a Good in all crash tests and a Superior for front
crash prevention technology.
The Outlander achieved not only a top Good rating in all crash test, but a Superior for available front
crash prevention technologies.
The 2016 Audi A3 earned its 2015 Top Safety Pick title by performing well in the five standard crash tests, but wasn't eligible for Plus honors because it doesn't include any front
crash prevention technology.
The 2016 Volkswagen Golf received a Top Safety Pick Plus rating from the IIHS because of its good test performance, on top of
its crash prevention technologies such as forward collision warning and low - speed autobrake.
It also received a Superior for available front
crash prevention technologies.
It excelled in all five and even received a «Superior» rating for its frontal
crash prevention technology.
Twenty - two vehicles earn the Institute's highest safety award for 2014, Top Safety Pick +, thanks to a high level of protection in crashes and the availability of front
crash prevention technology to avoid many collisions in the first place.
Front
crash prevention technologies are also evaluated and rated as Basic, Advanced, or Superior.
To earn this rating, a vehicle has to earn the top «good» rating in all crash tests, an «advanced» or «superior» rating for front
crash prevention technology, and a «good» headlight rating.
Phrases with «crash prevention technology»