Sentences with phrase «create chances for their strikers»

Those teams actually create chances for their strikers.

As a CM or a DLP he is supposed to create chances for our strikers and transition our defence to attack but all he does is side and backpasses and still loses posession with zero to little pressure..

Midfielders are also contributing by winning balls and creating chances for strikers.

We could have won, but the midfield didn't create the chances for the strikers.

«When teams play good football it tends to create chances for the striker.

The blistering pace of Rashford and his eye for a goal, not to mention the eye for a goal and the physicality offered by Lukaku could see Premier League defences shivering at the prospect of facing the pair, not to mention Anthony Martial and Henrikh Mkhitaryan, who will both create chances for the strikers and even score their own goals.

Not exact matches

To all giroud bashers, who claimed other strikers would score 30goals for all the chances wil created, man city, liverpool actually created more scoring chances than us which depicts that our midfielders need to create more to meet up with these teams and our fans must stop picking on players to attack.

Any decent striker would easily have scored more than 25 league goals for Arsenal a season with the number of chances our midfield creates in every match.

He was given on of the best strikers in the world and he set up a team who failed to create a single chance for him.

Morale is down, toxicity in the stands is spreading to the dressing room, pay attention to Ozil and Sanchez and even Bellerins body language, the playing for a lost cause... If I'm Ozil there is no way I'm putting in a similar level of performance I did last season if the «main striker» goes missing for 14 games despite creating 141 chances and breaking the premier league record

That means we lose the pace of Danny Welbeck up front, but that can be compensated by playing the pacy Alexis and Oxlade - Chamberlain in the wide attacking positions, with Cazorla creating chances for them and linking up with the big French striker.

Campbell isn't a striker dumb dumb, he's RW and he creates more chances than Walcott even though he's only been here for half a season and is only 23.

The way we play, these three create a lot of chances for each other and we really don't need an out and out striker.

-- Sanchez: Can handle the opponents» pressure very well when playing behind a striker, has high work rate, has excellent close control like Cazorla and has great vision to create chances for the others.

You need a striker that can create chances for himself and score against all odds.

Sanchez is our striker yet no one has created a chance for him in the last two games.

-- Sanchez missed some good chances, but the guy is a beast, and nice to see players put in that effort every game, and he creates openings for himself and others — Giroud is a great striker, but most of his goals are 1 - touch finishes.

Despite Arsenal's usual blistering start to the season, we have dropped away in the title race through our lack of goals, and us fans have (obviously) blamed our strikers like Olivier Giroud and Theo Walcott for not putting away the chances created, especially by our assist king Mesut Ozil.

For the type of chances Arsenal create, he should be a 30 + striker.

After failing to break the record for the most assists because of a main striker that didn't convert any of the chances he created in 4 months, Mesut will demand change.

I thought people here were debating about two or three seasons back why he should be our top striker.When I thought the Monaco match was the icing on the cake to show how average he was it seems just like Wenger we» will never learn our lesson.Now people our okay with him being a super sub which is debatable.Giroud was a super sub in games last season because he wasn't played when he was supposed to.He's not your ideal super sub because he very hardly creates but rather requires people to create for him.Most of the time super subs are the one's who tend to create the chances and open up spaces in the opposition defence.West ham are ready to pay and hence we should demand more from them.We can then use the money from his sale on far better players.Given the same seasons, time and chances a lot of average strikers can do better than what he did.This is because Arsenal create a lot of chances and it just needs someone who can finish.Goodbye!.

Fabianski was just too good and we never had a striker that could make good runs, create chances for himself or take shots from any area around the opposition box.

And it is a quality that Arsenal can not afford to lose, so how about Wenger giving him another Arsenal striker to create chances for?

You have to pay up for strikers who are able to create their own chances.

Aubamaeyang may well be pushed out to the left to accommodate Lacazette in the centre but the Gabon international can do great things coming off the flank and I think Lacazette is the more natural centre forward, so it could turn out to be the perfect system, with Ozil on the right creating chances for the two strikers.

Welbeck who actually have the attributes of arsenal type striker is not a quality finisher, he could have been in double figures if he actually finish the chances created for him the past season with so few games.

THAT SUMS IT ALL FOR DEAR ARSENAL, no matter how good we are or how good we create a chance, u don't have a good striker that can take at least one of every 4 - 5 chance the opponent would always have a go at punishing u

Well im not in a wonderland he has his failings as we all do and great teams find a way to win good teams sit where we are 6 -5-4 but thats besides the point and it would be nice if your aunty had bolocks cause then we d be second but ive watched the games were an offensive team most the time although were terrible in the pissing rain but for the most part the game plans have worked weve created chances quality scoring chances one after the other problem is for me the finishing unless we sit back with 9 man behind the ball or ten when you push forward you will give up a goal if you lousy forwards fail to finish the set ups have been there this year but our strikers have failed to kill the games if we create quality chances and grab leads in the first 60 minutes like we have for the most part and in those games those games should of been killed even if we give a goal or two alongside the strategy but we failed to hit multiple should be goals we tried laca we'll see abou auba although hes a bit lazy so far but we'll see but we've lacked that quality in front goal a player the chances have been there im looking at the failure of the strikers and maybe that is his fault but monreal has scored as many goals recently as our strikers and thats sad our defenders or a midfielder will score and our stikers cant tally one in th first 60 mins of a game alongside them then were tired for last 40 give them hope there still only down one and we rue our missed chances while they push thats where iv been frustrated with this season not the tactics but the finishing

The German has been our best player all season, creating chance after chance for our misfiring strikers, but now it appears that he has been told to change his ways.

Finally, if Wenger really cares that Arsenal go to the next level with Lacazette in the striker's role he will need to surround him with the proper kinds of players, those who compliment his skills and give him a legitimate chance to lead the line... if they can spread the opposing teams back line with Sanchez on the left and someone of consequence on the right (must purchase this individual), this would likely create some space for Ozil in the middle of the pitch... having 3 players who can not only create their own opportunities, but provide assists and make well - timed runs, could bring some much - needed directness back into our ticky - tack approach of late... unfortunately instead of making the tough decisions and spending the supporters money in the right places, we instead have wasted so much time bashing our heads against the same brick wall over and over again and expecting different results..

He may not be the most scintilating player to watch like Sanchez or Hazard, but the guy does what he is required to do, create chances and opportunities for our strikers to capitalize on.

unless we are planning to sell jack, Ramsey, Carzola, or even coquelin i don't get these transfer... who do we play where??? We had no problem in midfield last season (in my opinion) but if we are doing these just for the numbers then am ok with it... Our real problem is the No. 9 position... Guys theres a reason strikers cost and are paid higher than other players... A striker who scores at - least a goal in three good chances created is exactly what we need

However, even when he is «off - form» for a game, Ozil still creates a few goalscoring chances that our strikers need to do better to convert.

This is very interesting.I look at the number of striking options in our team and i wonder how Wenger will be signing a cf.However as i keep saying a cf is a need not a want.And needs are more important than wants.We have needed a World class cf since Robin Van P. Left.Just look at the feeling you get when you have a world class goalkeeper e.g Cech in the team.You feel relieved you know why?Its because the goalkeeper is very reliable, very talented and consistent.Imagine the feeling you would have when having a world class cf in the team.You feel very relieved you know why?its because the cf is very consistent, is super talented, will at most times finish off chances and will mostly create moments of magic.Arsenal need a world class cf so as to have that sense of reliability and to not put too much pressure on the midfield to always create chances for them.We neeed that consistency infront of goal to excel.Right now arsenal's centre forwards are very inconsistent, unreliable at most times and are not very clinical.We need a world class striker so that at least if the team is not performing he can take control and do something out of nothing.You need to understand the benefits of having a world class cf its not just about goals or talent but about being a leader of the attack, a strong scoring mentality and also the will to be consistent.World class cf's give your attack the ish factor.

RVP happens to be the rat who was injured for 7 years, causing all our top playmakers to leave in frustation at having no striker to finish off the chances they created and having ONE good eighth year and asking to leave so as to «win trophies».

@ergs I don't get the logic behind the thought that many here think the other 3/4 forwards only job is to create chances for the lone targetman striker, nothing more... Lmfao

He creates lots of chances for his teammates, with some of the highest xA numbers of any striker, and he still does defensive work.

I believe nearly every striker in the Premier League would have a good record for Arsenal, we create chances at an unmatched rate.

Even though the Arsenal and France international star Alexandre Lacazette was on for his first hat - trick for the Gunners on Thursday night, and with the amount of chances being created against CSKA Moscow you felt it may well come, Arsene Wenger replaced the striker with around 20 minutes of the game still to play.

For me he hasn't worked hard enough or done his due dillegance and taken advantage of the opportunities that his been awarded (he literally in the past 2 years is the only striker, who can walk straight into a starting line up) he sits in front of one of the best attacking line ups in the world and its not like chances aren't being created, he just can't put them away....

Ozil still has the chance to be exceptional if the striker he is creating chances for is not Giroud.

When a striker who can not create his own chances Squander the chances created for him, then there is a problem.

If a normal No. 10 can create 3 - 5 chances per game, Ozil can double of that, his talent is to create chances for our 1 striker & 2 wingers, to increase our goal chances, not to run up & down the flanks chasing the ball & tackling the players as a winger.

Playing the ball back to the midfield with just a single defender on him, can't even turn and creates chance for himself it is just a shame of a striker to say a little: Oooh!

I remember Chamberlain running past 3 - 4 defenders for fun against the likes of City and Chelsea when he was still new, but now he can't even run past one, likewise Sanchez was all over the field creating chances when we first signed him but now he's been restricted to the left to accommodate a severely limited striker.

The French striker will come under criticism for his two efforts which were both placed off target, but the fact that he managed to create the space and get into the right position to get those chances is more than PEA did at any point of the game.

He has got a very good conversion rate and he can create chances for others SO if he is associated with a striker up front, I think he will do well OTHERWISE he will struggle.

In what was an insane market for strikers — where inflationary pressures of all the TV money sloshing around combined with a shortage in quality front men — # 25m seemed a reasonable amount of money to spend on a young striker who has already shown he can score Premier League goals in a team that creates few chances.

They sold Romelu Lukaku, a striker who had been criticised for his failure to add much to Everton's game beyond goal - scoring but was nevertheless very good at scoring those goals, then with the money gained bought a collection of playmakers but failed to replace the man who could finish the chances they created.

With Arsenal, Pato would simply flourish, as players like Mesut Ozil, Alexis Sanchez and co. would create enough chances for the striker to tuck away.