page 10's Conclusion: The student's «climate change misinformation campaign is a multi-faceted scheme» statement is technically true, but regarding the assertion about «almost everything leads back to the fossil fuel industry,» this student's paper inadvertently becomes a case study of how scrutiny of every angle of such accusations does not actually reveal the appearance of a disinformation campaign
created by the fossil fuel industry, but instead one apparently created and promulgated by enviro - activists, supported in a major way to this very day by character assassination accusations from a single source — Ross Gelbspan and the clique of enviro - activists surrounding him.
For example, a dollar invested in clean energy creates three times as many jobs as would be
created by the fossil fuel industry, and workers in the clean economy earn better wages than the median American wage.
(b) that government action to reduce the threat of climate change has been consistently blocked by the disinformation
created by the fossil fuel industry;
Doing this with our organic wastes - biofuel crop, some energy is generated and we could greatly expand windmill generated electricity that has no GHG emissions and actually recycles some of the energy excess
created by fossil fuels.
Combine this with point 1 above, and you can see that there are indeed «external» but «private» benefits
created by fossil fuels and industrial production.
Not exact matches
The New Plastics Economy presents three key platforms:
creating an effective after - use plastics economy
by improving global recycling efforts, reducing the leakage of plastic waste into the environment, and decoupling plastic from the
fossil fuels used to
create it.
When we clear forests, we're not only knocking out our best ally in capturing the staggering amount of GHGs we humans
create (which we do primarily
by burning
fossil fuels at energy facilities, and of course, in cars, planes, and trains).
Not only will these projects benefit our environment
by reducing dependence on
fossil fuels and using renewable energy, but they are also
creating well - paying jobs for New Yorkers.
Hawkins praised Stein's Green New Deal, a proposed plan that aims to
create 20 million new jobs
by transitioning from
fossil fuel - based infrastructure to 100 % clean renewable energy
by 2030, while also investing in improved public transportation and community - based agriculture.
This initiative will
create numerous jobs and move our region into the 21st century
by working with green technologies that reduce our reliance on the combustion of
fossil fuels.»
This would help
create 4.5 million new jobs while cutting electric rates
by half compared to continued reliance on
fossil fuels.
Building out the full renewable energy system in New York in the next 15 years will
create 4.5 million jobs while lowering electric rates to half of what
fossil and nuclear
fuels will cost in the next decade, according to a recent study
by Cornell and Stanford researchers.
When Obama emphasized his «all of the above» energy plan, it sparked a combative back - and - forth duel with a subtext about who would
create more jobs
by permitting the private sector to develop
fossil fuels on public land and on the outer continental shelf.
The primary way freshwater ecosystems absorb CO2
created by humans burning
fossil fuels is likely different than what happens in oceans.
A study in Krakow, Poland, corroborates New York City findings that link children's lower IQ scores with mothers» exposure to compounds
created by burning
fossil fuels
The Bulletin acknowledges that the increased use of carbon - free nuclear energy could help mitigate global warming brought on
by fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions but concludes that the possibility of misusing enriched uranium and separated plutonium to
create bombs is a «terrible trade - off» for trying to control climate change.
Growing crops for
fuel — known as biofuels — represents another potential way of cutting GHGs
by replacing
fossil fuels (biofuels
created underground
by nature over millions of years).
And the team gets its rosy results even though it didn't add in the health and environmental costs of the pollution
created by burning
fossil fuels.
Those steps include deriving 40 % of electric power capacity from
fossil fuel — free sources
by 2030, reducing its emissions intensity
by 33 % to 35 %
by 2030, and expanding forests to
create a carbon sink capable of absorbing 2.5 billion to 3 billion tons of carbon from the atmosphere.
To be honest, I, too, have on occasion found comfort in such facile explanations for the nation's abject failure to deal with so many glaring problems, including several of interest to readers of car magazines: the pervasive failure to address global warming and finite supplies of
fossil fuels; tens of thousands of road fatalities year in and year out; the burgeoning safety risk caused
by in - car communications and telematics; the failure to maintain the roads we've got while
creating better ones and efficient alternatives; and, of course, our continued inability to buy new Peugeots in the United States.
To intentionally misquote Mr. McGuire in the»67 film The Graduate, «There's a great future in bioplastics,» but the problem is that some bioplastics can contain petro - based plastics as well, which might reduce the overall amount of
fossil fuel - based plastics, while inadvertently
creating more waste
by allowing consumers to treat these bioplastics more casually than they do traditional plastics.
And indeed, the
fossil fuel industry's generation - long campaign of denial, deceit and disinformation — aided and abetted
by so - called «journalists» such as yourself — has been tragically successful at
creating obstruction and delay, and millions of people are already suffering and millions more will inevitably suffer and die as a result, no matter what we do now.
Five cities and counties in California that are suing
fossil fuel companies for damages triggered
by climate change are now at the center of a legal paradox
created by conflicting decisions from two federal court judges reviewing nearly identical claims.
Localization will help solve required transitions from high
fossil fuel and nuclear energy costs and global problems
created by Peak Oil.This will be done
by moving quickly to mass public and commercial use of economic and greener energy supplies from solar, wind, hydro and geothermal energy sources.
Everything in our world that isn't rocks, dirt, or indigenous plants and animals was
created as a result of energy expenditure
by man — the vast majority of that, via
fossil fuels.
By running our civilization on
fossil fuels, we are both
creating and destroying climates that our descendants will live in tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of years from now.
The momentum
created by such commitments spurred dozens of nations, joined
by the World Bank and other influential institutions, to pledge to cut subsidies for
fossil fuels.
Friends of the Earth Europe is working to
create the much - needed, fair and urgent transition to a
fossil fuel free Europe
by 2030.
The campaign launched last week with a letter demanding that Brown halt the development of all new dirty
fuel projects in California,
create a plan to phase out all
fossil fuel extraction as quickly as possible and provide support and opportunities for those most impacted
by the transition.
More broadly, a carbon tax would not just move shipping and aviation down the
fossil fuel demand curve; it would
create a new, lower demand curve
by boosting every substitute for, and every alternative to, high - carbon activity.
But
by diverting funding away from renewables and
creating fossil fuel dependency on authoritarian Azerbaijan?
REMI concluded that CCL's proposal would
create between 2.1 to 2.8 million jobs, reduce carbon pollution
by 50 %, increase household incomes, save up to 230,000 lives that would otherwise be lost from the pollution of burning
fossil fuels, and add up to 1.3 trillion more to the GDP over a 20 year period.
Most Americans can correctly identify carbon dioxide as a gas
created by the burning of
fossil fuels (68 %), and a similar share, 65 %, recognize that a comparison or control group is a better method for testing the effectiveness of a new drug than simply giving the drug to a single group.
Carbon and Other Biochemical Cycles: On cumulative
fossil fuel emissions for the 2012 - 2100 period, China, Kenya and Venezuela, opposed
by Germany, said presenting figures for the means together with the ranges
created confusion.
The participants played the role of negotiators representing countries and six regional blocs (United States, EU, Other Developed Countries, China, India, Other Developing Countries) and three interest groups (the Press / Media / Journalists, Climate Activists, and
Fossil Fuel Lobby) to
create an agreement that limits climate change
by reducing greenhouse gas emissions at the model UNFCCC Conference of Parties international climate change negotiations.
Attacks on the credibility of climate science are perpetuated
by vested interests, including the
fossil fuel industry, which has pumped millions of dollars into
creating uncertainty about our understanding of climate change.
As I reported at this post, a demonstration project
by a South Korean utility to
create a functioning electricity system mostly
fueled by wind ended up with costs on the order of ten times the costs of the conventional system,
by the time the excess capacity, storage and
fossil fuel back - up were taken into account.
It can be added that CO2 impacts are only part of the troubles and impacts
created by the fighting over the right to benefit most from burning
fossil fuels.
Furthermore, as stated
by the EPA «Biofuels also tend to require subsidies and other market interventions to compete economically with
fossil fuels, which
creates deadweight losses in the economy.»
(Beder, 1998) • Amplify the voices of contrarian scientists, (Cooler Heads Coalition,
created by conservative think tanks) Dunlap and McCright, 2011: 151) • Convince people that «using
fossil fuels to enable our economic activity is as natural as breathing.»
All renewable sources are uneconomic
by huge factors compared to
fossil fuels, and would bankrupt nations and
create mass poverty.
Under the guise of preventing «dangerous manmade climate change» and compensating poor countries for alleged «losses and damages» due to climate and weather caused
by rich country
fossil fuel use, they had planned to control the world's energy supplies and living standards, replace capitalism with a new UN-centered global economic order, and redistribute wealth from those who
create it to those who want it.
As the transition to zero - carbon accelerates, many
fossil -
fueled power stations will have to be closed before they reach the end of their natural life, the IEA says, causing lost earnings and
creating «stranded assets» that are worth less than expected
by investors.
Finally, solar power benefits public health
by not contributing to the pollution
created at every step in the
fossil fuel process — from the extraction wells and mines through the pipelines and at the smokestack.
So, rather than claim that fracking is good because it
creates jobs, maybe CEOs in the energy industry should look towards sustainability, and recognize that,
by definition, a sustainable energy industry will
create jobs for a longer time than an unsustainable one, and the change from dirty to clean energy will yield short - term jobs and long - term profitability without the massive downside of
fossil fuels.
Other options include the transfer of IMF -
created «special drawing rights» (reserve assets
created by the International Monetary Fund that countries can exchange for hard currency) from rich to poorer countries, redirecting harmful
fossil -
fuel subsidies, reducing spending on ballooning military budgets, and taxing aviation and shipping.
For example, they do not consider alternative methods such as reducing the amount of cars circulating within the European Union or increasing the appeal of the public transportation system
by upgrading the already existing facilities,
creating safer and improved bike - lanes in big cities, or electrifying the transport system to slowly reduce its dependency on
fossil fuels.
The problem is that instead of reducing
fossil fuels, these investments come at the expense of the renewable energy
created by I - 937.
The IEA led in
creating scenarios of reducing
fossil fuel usage
by developing targets that had a chance of getting all countries on board.
The reason goes back to the original point of the PR campaign
by the
fossil fuel lobby — to
create a sense of doubt in the public mind about this issue.