Not exact matches
Suncor can not, simply
by having legal counsel declare that an investigation has commenced, throw a blanket over all materials «
created and / or collected during the internal investigation» so as to clothe them with solicitor - client or
litigation privilege.
One issue that may arise in practice is as to whether documents
created pursuant to an internal investigation to determine whether an entity must self - report a breach of the law are protected
by litigation privilege.
(2) BTA Bank v. Ablyazov [2014] EWHC 2788 Bank entitled to production of documents
created by or produced for solicitors as Defendant not entitled to claim
litigation privilege.
In Alberta v. Suncor Energy Inc, 2016 ABQB 264, certain documents and records
created or collected during an accident investigation were protected
by litigation and solicitor - client
privilege where legal counsel made decisions with respect to the accident investigation within hours of the event.
Instead, to determine whether a document is covered
by litigation privilege a Court must look at the purpose for which each document was
created, not the purpose for which it may have been collected or put to use.
In rejecting ENRC's claim of
privilege, the judge held that
litigation was not in reasonable contemplation, although the documents were
created in the context of an anticipated criminal investigation
by the SFO.
The Court of Appeal made it clear that at the time of
creating the statement in February 2011, no decision to prosecute had been taken
by the Health and Safety Executive and matters were still at the investigatory stage and therefore that
litigation privilege did not apply.
While positioning investigative capability within the legal function maximises claims to
privilege and
creates the opportunity for deploying the forensic expertise of
litigation lawyers in investigative roles, it is
by no means standard in the market, and many companies still engage compliance teams in investigative activity.