Not exact matches
Justice Breyer suggested that, although a Phillips - based standard might be appropriate if Congress intended to
create a «little court proceeding,» the BRI standard might be appropriate if Congress intended IPR proceedings as a mechanism to allow the public to force a second look at many
patents controlled
by patent trolls that never should have been allowed.
Patent trolling by opportunistic litigants, who acquire
patents not to
create products but to pursue a pay - off, is a worrying drain on innovation
Large numbers of Eastern District of Texas filings are being
created by a relatively small number of non-practicing entities, also known as «
patent trolls.»
«Instead of
creating new jobs and investing in new technologies, businesses large and small across many industries — from national realty, construction, and technology businesses to Main Street retail shops, hotels, grocers, convenience stores, and restaurants — continue to be forced to divert scarce resources to fighting frivolous lawsuits and overly broad claims made
by Patent Assertion Entities, or «patent trolls».&
Patent Assertion Entities, or «
patent trolls».&
patent trolls».»
Any
patent created by a tax exempt organization like a University, federal department (like the Dept of Energy), or any other non-profit that receives a taxpayer subsidy, should be off - limits to
trolls.
«Instead of
creating new jobs and investing in new technologies, businesses large and small across many industries... continue to be forced to divert scarce resources to fighting frivolous lawsuits and overly broad claims made
by Patent Assertion Entities, or «patent trolls».&
Patent Assertion Entities, or «
patent trolls».&
patent trolls».»
We have written before about how a broken
patent system has led to an explosion of lawsuits
by patent trolls (companies that assert
patents as a business model instead of
creating products).
The SHIELD Act, or the Saving High - Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act (H.R. 845), is designed to help the innocent victims of
patent trolls by creating a «fee shifting» system.
Unfortunately, however, such cost shifting mechanisms do not address the issues
created by NPEs (i.e.
patent trolls) who amass intellectual property portfolios in order to become virtual gatekeepers on the road of technological advancement.
I've just
patented the idea for
creating a SHIELD act that protects companies from being sued
by patent trolls, and acts that prevent the creation of
patents regardless of cost and / or «how - frivolous - they - may - seem.»
In short, the paper finds that investment and entrepreneurship would have been higher if not for the hostile environment
created by «frequent
patent litigators,» such as
patent trolls.
The result is that
patents — especially the vague and overbroad software
patents beloved
by trolls — act as a disincentive to innovate and
create.