Obviously I'd love everything to be fair trade, but if we're
created economic inefficiencies — going back to the subsidies we talked about earlier — then our business isn't sustainable.
Not exact matches
An answer to both question could go like this: It is sometimes fair to tax one group higher than another because we have
created an economy where there is an incredible potential for group A to accumulate drastically more amounts of
economic wealth than group B, even though the labor of group B is more intrinsically valuable than group A. Given this
inefficiency, it is just to redistribute asymmetrically because the initial distribution was flawed.
«We oppose ethanol subsidies because they distort
economic signals about price and demand and
create inefficiencies that divert resources from productive activities to politically favored ones.
Net metering upends the historical regulatory compact, conflicts with federal law, and
creates perverse
economic inefficiencies.
Indeed, Kimberly A. Moore — a judge on the Federal Circuit court responsible for all patent appeals — once wrote that pervasive venue shopping in patent cases represents a failure of «the promise of equal, consistent and uniform application of justice,» besides
creating «
economic inefficiency in the legal system.»