Sentences with phrase «created evil in»

Cosmology theory, by default, defines God as an Existent God, a perverse mega-creature, who created evil in the universe so we can step right into the trap.

In the classical, Christian cosmology, the Fall, starting with Satan, really, creates the evil in the cosmos.

Although my life (as I knew it) was destroyed by egos creating evil in my life, the blessings were / are that I'm closer to God than ever.

Not exact matches

The carry trade, derivatives and massive injections of money created out of thin air are but nails in our coffins and if we do not stop these evil people it will mean destruction.

Politicians have used religion to advance their claims to just wars but in truth, they are not religious conflicts, just a facade created by atheists to avoid blame for the evil they cause.

a) that the bible is an imperfect human representation of gods word b) that the bible is a mixture of mythology and divine inspiration c) that the bible was created in a way that people would understand at the time and intended to be updated d) that a pure message was corrupted intentionally by evil humans or spirits

An omnipotent, omniscient god that supposedly created the universe and all in it, would not have needed to create evil, disease, and illness in the first place and would have the power to eliminate evil, disease, and illness if it chose to.

I see the image of God in man through mans ability to form unseen thoughts into reality creating works of never ending wonder in the presence of evil that seeks only to destroy that which is good.

let alone the god they present, one who could have created any kind of world he wanted, like an author who has complete control over what shows up in a fictional work; why would god then giddily create / allow so much pain and evil?

True, where humans are involved, we see a reflection of good and evil in how we can create Babel towers out of a lot of things.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

If Warfield is not concerned with Catholicism, then why in his discussion of the kind of «faith healing» promoted by men like A. J. Gordon does he claim that it creates a class of «professionals» who stand between the soul and God and that «from this germ the whole sacerdotal evil has grown»?

Now if God can create any possible world — i.e., if one affirms «I» omnipotence — then it seems clearly to follow that no evil state of affairs in the actual world is genuine.

That is, while Griffin acknowledges that Plantinga affirms limitations on God's power in relation to possible worlds containing free human beings, he believes Plantinga to hold «that an actual world devoid of beings with some power of self - determination would be possible» and thus that God could have created a world containing no evil simply by creating a world containing no self - determined beings (GPE 271).

Plantinga, however does affirm I2, in that he does believe that God could have unilaterally «brought about» a world containing no evil if he had chosen not to create at all or to actualize a possible world containing no self - determining individuals other than himself.

In short, if those dissatisfied with the classical account of nonmoral evil currently under discussion are not able to present a better world, «the (classical) theist does not have to show that it was impossible for God to create a better set of world - constituents or natural laws, or even that this is the best of all possible worlds» (IPQ 179 - 98).

I consider that men DID create and write the bible, but both Christ and satan are metaphors... christ is the metaphor for the potential good in a person, satan the metaphor for the potential of bad or evil... given that this is MY definition, and makes much more sense that most other beleifs, then the bible WAS written by satan, or rather it was inspired by the bad / evil side of the minds of the writers.

Observer, you can call God «Zeus», if you regard Him as our eternal infinite Holy Creator and Judge, who created all and will continue to create, whose purity requires purity to dwell with Him, whose love within overflowed to create man in His image with free will, who permitted rebellion for the purpose of destroying evil, and who surrendered His Son to allow us to use our free will to glorify Him and enjoy Him forever.

In addition to recognizing common grace, Calvinism acknowledges the reality of a «common curse,» said Carter, in that «man is fallen, man has a bent toward evil, and man is not capable of creating utopia on his own.&raquIn addition to recognizing common grace, Calvinism acknowledges the reality of a «common curse,» said Carter, in that «man is fallen, man has a bent toward evil, and man is not capable of creating utopia on his own.&raquin that «man is fallen, man has a bent toward evil, and man is not capable of creating utopia on his own.»

God created chaos by creating evil and this Luifcer guy, killed millions in floods, fires, disasters and then his own son.

In this kind of theodicy Gethesemane, the cross, and the resurrection are important foci for understanding the depths of God's love, who, in creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon iIn this kind of theodicy Gethesemane, the cross, and the resurrection are important foci for understanding the depths of God's love, who, in creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon iin creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon iin persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon iin the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon iin the evil that its human creatures inflict upon it.

There are but two methods of providing against this evil: the one by creating a will in the community independent of the majority, that is, of the society itself; the other, by comprehending in the society so many separate descriptions of citizens as will render an unjust combination of a majority of the whole very improbable, if not impracticable.»

Not to mention every verse in the Bible that asserts that God is in control of the universe, that he is the one who is responsible for unbelief as well as belief, that he created both good AND EVIL, would be wrong, meaning the Bible would be fallible, meaning that the validity of everything else inside it would be called into question as well.

God did not create evil or sin because evil exists only in a negative way.

The temptation that led to this sin as well as to the other evil in the created order is to be explained by the previous rebellion of angels.

If there is free will in Heaven but no evil, that goes to show that God can in fact create worlds with both free will and no evil.

I think scripture is a rich metaphor created by human in an attempt to understand the presence of evil in the world, as well as to express their hope that it will end.

But it was the Father's will to redeem humanity from slavery to evil and eternal corruption, and precisely for the sake of His Son in whom humankind was created and called to become co-sharers of the Divine Nature.

Your god created everything including «evil», supposedly with the full knowledge of the consequences... so what you are in effect saying, is god wanted the holocaust to happen, since we would gain some small knowledge because of it.

There is in Isaiah the puzzling verse, «I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things».

Only Jesus can pray to Jesus that Jesus doesn't cast us into the Hell that Jesus created because Jesus loves us and wants us to live for eternity in His Heaven unless we do not believe in and honor Him, whereupon He will vomit us up and into the everlasting agony of Hell which He prays we do not go to because He loves us so much even though we are born evil and vile in His eyes and require being born again so that He does not condemn us to a fiery eternity and, rather, can love us in Heaven for ever and ever, Amen.

It can lead to competition and conflict among member states, but it also creates the conditions for cooperation in promoting the common good and confronting evil and injustice.

Second, you are saying it tells us god is the one in control, yet you've already told us just the opposite, that god didn't create evil.

Our best moral theories might seem to entail that nothing could justify God's having created a world with so much evil in it.

My question boils down to: Why would a perfect all loving, all powerful, all knowing god CREATE the VERY ESSENCE of evil, and would that not indicate that god is evil in nature?

sanders, If your god created the universe and all in it, it created humans with all the perceived flaws and it created evil.

Hart, who next year will be a visiting professor at Providence College, spoke with us about evil and its place in the world that God created and loves.

observer, If God did not put the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in the the Garden of Eden nor created Satan, the nature of Adam and Eve would still have been the same just not revealed.

I think you're asking in a gnostic sense, suggesting there might be a good and an evil God creating things.

The cosmic «I» no longer sees the perpetual perishing of worlds or universes, or even itself, as ultimate evil, but instead cries out in adoration to its creator: «It is enough to have been created, to have embodied for a moment the infinite and tumultuously creative spirit.

Honestly, the way I see it, when people say someone has demons in them or is possessed, or says that evil people will be created for these evil days, it's saying to me, «F*ck free will!»

(he says god didn't create the world with evil and death in it till «man'turned away from him, as in worship me or I'm a gonna smack you upside the head boy which god did in his world) in my world, it was created, not sure how, big bang..

I see the universe as a perfect and balanced place created by god in his own special way, he is all powerful and evil does not exit rather the ability to have freedom of will.

Rather, he created a universe of beings in which evil is a possibility and has indeed occurred.

If I was a believer in a deity that I say created everything I would have to praise both the good and the evil that it does.

Religion is evil because man is involved in it, man created it and man perpetuates it.

In this book he argued that religion created a conscience which is quick to understand social need, that religious philanthropy gives charitably but without raising ultimate questions about the causes of social maladjustment, that religion «unifies individuals, stabilizes societies, creates social imagination and sanctifies social life; but it also perpetuates ancient evils, increases social inertia, creates illusions and preserves superstitions.

They can't see the basic human psychology in stories about a being (or beings) who have power over good and evil, who has the ability to give ot take life, to forgive or to condemn, to create heaven or hell.

If God created everything, doesn't this mean he created sin, the devil, and generally everything which is evil in the world?

The basic problem to which Paul addresses himself in this passage is the prevalence of sin and evil in the world created good by God.