Has
she created human clones of herself?
Opponents said that the measure should have banned somatic cell nuclear transfer; it criminalized only the «implantation» of an embryo into a woman to
create a human clone.
There are other extremely specific — and extremely spoiler - y — details from the other books that make up the spine of film: for instance, that the psychologist Dr. Ventriss (Leigh) is dying of cancer; that she's actually the director of the Southern Reach; that this whole Area X business possibly started when a comet hit the lighthouse; and that there are aliens that can
create human clones that they send out into the world.
Not exact matches
Tonight I ask you to pass legislation to prohibit the most egregious abuses of medical research:
human cloning in all its forms,
creating or implanting embryos for experiments,
creating human - animal hybrids, and buying, selling, or patenting
human embryos.
It allows
cloning for the purpose of treating
created human organism as a corn crop.
Benedict argued that non-conjugal reproduction such as in vitro fertilization had
created «new problems» ¯ the freezing of
human embryos, for instance, and the selective abortion of medically implanted embryos, together with pre-implantation diagnosis, embryonic stem - cell research, and attempts at
human cloning.
We can not, for instance,
clone human beings to provide soldiers for the military or with the expectation that they will be great athletes or in an attempt to
create a great musician or scientist.
The theological claim that only God can
create human life is no less true if we learn to
clone human beings than it is now.
I'll even offer observations -
humans have manipulated existing organisms dna,
created new virus and bacteria,
clone animals, and attempt to
create new animals - yet simple minded folks still reject the idea that another more intelligent creature might have done the same thing and
created life on earth in the same fashion while at the same time acknowledging that there is a strong likelihood of other life existing in this universe - talk about being dumbed down and arrogant.
After months of discussion, the group drafted a call to ban all
human cloning and to limit ESCR to the use of the «excess» embryos
created in the process of in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Unlike the controversial method of tissue harvesting that requires some
human embryos to be destroyed, the new
cloning technique can use a patient's own skin cells — combined with an unfertilized
human egg — to
create tissue with a DNA match.
Scientists looking for new methods to make
human tissue have successfully used
cloning technology to
create embryonic stem cells from skin cells.
An example is «I have a hypothesis that aliens
cloned their DNA to
create the first
humans on planet Earth».
Additionally, we have chimerism where one person doesn't even have unique DNA throughout their body, not to mention forms of
cloning that could potentially
create creatures, including
humans, with absolutely identical DNA.
If eve came from Adams rib, they would share DNA (logically Adam's rib would have been Adams
clone, not Eve, but disregarding logic as one must in such cases) therefore the relationship would be incestuous and would
create humans with significant handicaps and disabilities, if anything at all.
However, in 2007 Professor Wilmut announced that he had decided to change to an alternative method of research pioneered in Japan, known as direct reprogramming or «de-differentiation», which could
create human embryonic cells without using
human eggs or
cloning human embryos.
Clonaid — closely tied to the Raelian sect, which believes aliens
created humans and
cloning is the gateway to immortality — is still in business.
There should be a complete ban on the implantation of a
human embryo
created by the application of
cloning technology into a womb, or any treatment of such a
human embryo intended to result in its development into a viable infant.
Varmus pointed out that a special review group he
created in 1994 to give advice on embryo research had already judged
human cloning to be «repugnant» — a view he endorsed.
Nayernia says trying this approach in
humans would spark controversy as it would involve
creating embryonic
clones of infertile men: «If we used this method in the clinic, it would raise ethical concerns.»
The paper not only seemed to validate the group's claim a year earlier that it had
created a single cell line from a
cloned human embryo, but it also reported a huge increase in efficiency for the technique.
A U.S. company has received two British patents that appear to grant it commercial rights to
human embryos
created by
cloning.
In May 2006, Eggan's lab received approval from Harvard to seek healthy
human eggs from female donors, a first step toward using research
cloning to
create new stem cell lines.
Researchers who have developed
cloning techniques in animals argued that
cloning humans — even were it acceptable, in principle, to
create children in this unorthodox manner — would be too risky in practice.
They view this as a test run for
creating human embryonic stem cells in the same way (and according to the team, South Korean biologist Hwang Woo Suk seems to have accidentally accomplished this feat while executing his famously fraudulent
human cloning experiment).
In 2006, Woo Suk Hwang had to retract two papers published in Science in which his team claimed it had used the technique employed in
cloning Dolly the sheep to
create human embryonic stem cells matched to specific people who had various diseases.
A new paper in the journal Cell claiming to have achieved breakthrough stem cell work — using
cloning to
create personalized
human embryonic stem cells — is coming under serious scrutiny.
The result suggests that, although Hwang deceived the world about achieving the first
human cloning, his group was first to succeed in performing
human parthenogenesis, which may offer a way of
creating cells that are genetically matched to a woman for transplantation back into her body to treat degenerative diseases.
Some fear that people may use
cloning to produce a subordinate class of
humans created as tissue or organ donors.
The technique used by Wilmut and his co-workers — a technology called somatic - cell nuclear transfer — will probably be the way in which the first
human clone will be
created.
But the favored reprogramming technique, somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), otherwise known as research
cloning, is fraught with ethical pitfalls as well as technical difficulties because it entails
creating a
human embryo by inserting an adult cell nucleus into an ooctye.
One team in Japan, and another in the US, have independently shown it is possible to produce embryonic - like stem cells directly from a patient's own skin cells without having to
create and destroy a
cloned human embryo first.
For their seminal contributions to concepts and methods of
creating a genetic map in the
human, and of positional
cloning, leading to the identification of thousands of
human disease genes and ushering in the era of
human genetics.
Though Hwang Woo - suk, a South Korean scientist claimed to have
created the first
human embryonic
clone and derived a stem - cell line from it in 2004 his work was later shown to be fraudulent.
Benedict argued that non-conjugal reproduction such as in vitro fertilization had
created «new problems» ¯ the freezing of
human embryos, for instance, and the selective abortion of medically implanted embryos, together with pre-implantation diagnosis, embryonic stem - cell research, and attempts at
human cloning.
A team of scientists from the New York Stem Cell Foundation Laboratory
created 13 early - stage
human embryos that were partial genetic
clones of diabetic patients.
After more debate, the government may change this allowing
cloned human cells and embryos to be
created for research purposes as long as they are destroyed after 14 days.
Several groups have concluded that reproductive
cloning of
human beings
creates ethical and scientific risks that society should not tolerate.
Replicants were
created as a
clone workforce when
humans started going off - planet.
Two days ago, seven
human clones — John, Michael, Father Thomas, Dr. Mike, Jay, Jack and Kilroy2.0 — were torn away from their «normal» lives to stop a ruthless plot
created by their progenitor, a man code - named John Alpha.
Creating, against all conventions on the use of
human clones, the manipulants, shapeshifters.
The goggle wearing
clones are seen as nothing more than expendable workers to the
humans who
created them, but that is all going to change in Stealth Inc 2 thanks to one adventurous
clone that takes advantage of his
human caretaker's greed and manages to escape certain doom.
Step into a trade show for a new species of hybrid,
cloned humans, a new world
created by mixed - media, multimedia artist Saya Woolfalk.
The unique nocturnal light, something in the shape of the vigilant animal, possibly exposed to danger, the glimmer of its hollow eyes in which
human figures appear occasionally to be reflected — all of these elements along with the dense lines of the flickering «text,»
create a disturbing feeling that something is amiss, perhaps the creature is artificial, maybe a
cloned jackal, maybe a hybrid.