Sentences with phrase «creating value betting»

It's also entirely possible that it's the public perception that is creating value betting on these East Coast teams.
As we expected, this pattern of bettors overvaluing home field advantage is amplified in «must - win» games which creates value betting against these home teams.

Not exact matches

Now, Robbins is betting on a few different companies whose tie - ups are likely to get a friendlier reception from antitrust officials, and which he thinks will create value in the combined businesses.
The old CDO market created lots of opportunities for investors to bet against corporate credit, because CDOs created lots of single - name credit default swaps that relative - value investors could buy.
Biotech companies tend to be speculative plays, bets on whether or not the company's research team will be able create a product or discovery of value.
This causes a false sense of security for bettors and can create excellent value betting against the nation's top ranked teams.
The media loves to over-publicize teams on a winning streak and vastly overreact to struggling teams, but does that create any value on the betting line?
Just like McGregor now, Hillary Clinton's odds skyrocketed in the final weeks and days before November 8th thanks to an influx of public betting, which created great value for bettors to go against the grain and take a shot on Trump at an inflated number.
They also love betting home teams, favorites and overs, which always creates added value on dogs, visitors and unders.
Sharp money hasn't taken a side in this matchup, but one - sided public betting appears to have created some contrarian value on the Boilermakers.
This influx of bets and public money on one side ends up creating value on the other side; the line may move and sharps will come in to grab it, or the line won't move and sportsbooks will end up with more liability on the public side.
As always we're going to fade the public, take the value created by square bettors and bet the road dog in this NFC South matchup.
Again, the one - sided betting action is creating some line value.
It's also appearing unlikely that Odell Beckham Jr. (ankle) will be able to go for New York, but the Giants are still receiving more than half the bets, perhaps creating some reverse line movement value on Dallas.
As I found while creating one of our more lucrative NFL betting systems, contrarian underdogs offer tremendous value in conference games.
With this knowledge in mind, our determination was to find other profitable betting systems that capitalized on the artificial value creating by these AP rankings.
Although sportsbooks know this information and build it into line, these «square» bettors often create artificial value by heavily betting the favorite and forcing sportsbooks to shade their lines to encourage action on the other side (typically the underdog).
The Broncos are getting 81 % of bets following their impressive 42 - 17 Week 2 win over Dallas, creating some potential contrarian value on Buffalo as home dogs.
Historically this has created value on underdogs and unders, but every season we update our betting percentage data to find the optimal betting percentage threshold for betting against the public.
We have previously discussed why the increased number of bets creates additional value for most betting against the public strategies, and that has certainly been true during the current bowl season.
We believed that oddsmakers would shade their lines to account for that public betting, which would create value for opportunistic bettors — especially when the volume ticks up in the playoffs.
With the influx of public money (as opposed to sharp action) producing an inflated line, we're happy to grab the extra two points of value created by the lopsided betting.
Much like our betting against the public philosophy, this often creates contrarian value for opportunistic bettors.
This creates a bunch of value on the other side and we see that betting against these top teams is a wise decision at the most rudimentary of levels.
The whole concept of betting against the public is based on the idea that «square» or uninformed public bettors create artificial line value by pounding one side — typically the favorite or the over.
One thing that creates value in fading the public is the sheer volume of bets placed on a given game.
The public typically will bet overs which creates value for sharper bettors who tend to lean towards the under.
We should also point out that this extremely one - sided public betting has historically created excellent value for contrarian bettors.
We believed that this oversight would create additional value when betting against tired teams.
Not all bet signals are created equal, and there's more value on moves triggered at market - setting sportsbooks like CRIS and Pinnacle.
It certainly appears that this lopsided public betting has created value on the Dolphins, but perhaps more importantly, they fit our vaunted 80/20 rule.
The fact that they're only receiving 20 % of spread bets is shocking, and has created excellent contrarian value.
The NHL playoffs have started and we believe that a combination of several factors will create contrarian value in the NHL playoff sports betting marketplace.
This creates additional value for contrarian strategies in heavily bet games with one - sided public betting.
The first week of NFL action is in the books and, as we explained in our most contrarian betting article for ESPN, that has historically created value based on overreactions from the betting public.
This lopsided betting has shifted the line 12 points at Pinnacle, which may have created some value on the National League.
This could create contrarian value on their opponent, so bettors should continue to monitor these lines and betting trends.
Squares — or casual weekend warriors — overwhelmingly bet favorites and high - scoring teams, which has historically created value on underdogs.
Public betting has moved the line from +140 to -105 since opening which I think has created some value the other way on Hull.
Although the only picks we fully endorse are our Best Bets, sharp money indicators like reverse line movement help offer insight into which teams are offering value and whether public perception is creating artificial line value.
When that lopsided public betting creates at least a half - point of artificial value (i.e. moving from +3 to +3.5 or -7 to -6.5), that record improves to 62 - 42 ATS (59.6 %).
I don't normally play totals but keep an eye on the line movement and betting %'s as they could create contrarian value on the Over.
For the record, this is a very small sample and there's a good chance we'll see an overreaction in the betting trends next week based on Tebow's performance Sunday, but it doesn't mean there isn't value being created for this week's game.
Clearly oddsmakers aren't in the business of creating value in a betting market purely by happenstance or insinuating that Germany and Portugal are power rated as equals.
-LSB-...] scorned companies are ignored like value stocks, which creates the opportunity for contrarian bet.
Admired companies are bid up like glamour stocks, and scorned companies are ignored like value stocks, which creates the opportunity for contrarian bet.
The problem with most value stocks is they're essentially slow - motion event - driven investments — management and / or the business clearly aren't creating / compounding value, so what you're really betting on is the potential closing * of a value gap... and your IRR gets worse & worse with every passing year.
Nintendo are the masters of creating artificial shortages to increase perceived demand / value in their products, they're scalpers favorite company, and I'd bet Nintendos favorite consumers are the scalpers, they're the reason amiibo were so successful for so long, until they started becoming actually available and started dropping in demand.
It's created a fertile ground for illegal betting as some players risk their reputation and career to get these high - value items from other players.
According to sources quoted by The Wall Street Journal, Chinese people were using bitcoin to bet against the value of the yuan and move money outside the country, and the authorities decided to issue the ban because the bitcoin market was creating «too much disorder.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z