Sentences with phrase «creation account as»

She places the same level of authority in ancient traditions and the personal views of uninspired authors on passages like the Creation account as she does in scripture itself.

(For example, a Christian woman once told me earnestly that even if biologists were able to demonstrate common descent to a certainty, she would still reject it for a simplistic interpretation of the Genesis creation account as a matter of faith.)

It is possible that the creation account as it really happened was passed down from Adam and so every culture had a similar creation story.

While it is true that the biblical view of creation sanctifies time and nature as created by God — and therefore good — it does not follow that the creation accounts as such are to be understood chronologically or as natural history.

For example, the bible offers no hint about needing to read either of the two contradictory creation accounts as metaphor and this fact is evidenced by the number of devout believers who, in the past or present, believe it to be «literal.»

Not exact matches

The company's core accounting suite — including receipt scanning as well as invoice creation and sending — is free, with no limits on usage.

Mr. Sloan, a veteran of the bank, took over as C.E.O. after his predecessor, John Stumpf, resigned after the eruption of a scandal involving Wells Fargo's creation of fake accounts.

Having long since grabbed the mantle of national economic powerhouse from Ontario — that the oil province accounted for the entirety of Canada's net job creation over the past 12 months being just the latest piece of evidence on that score — Alberta needs to take over Ontario's Big Man leadership role as well.

The WellSpring app will be released in April and the future versions will cover more functions such as wallet account creation, market data lookup and digital assets trading.

A report published by the Kauffman Foundation claims that startups — defined as companies less than 5 years old — accounted for all net job creation in the US between 1980 and 2007, despite the fact that on average, only half of the startups ever get to celebrate their fifth anniversary.

The Creation account of Genesis is often taken as literal historical narrative, yet in reality is is a beautiful example of ancient eastern poetry, with many truths hidden within it.

Secondly as stated further up the thread, the biblical account of creation was to show the authority of God to an ancient people.

But while it is hard to imagine theologians writing scientific papers that use the Bible's cosmology or creation account in a literal way, as though Copernicus or Darwin never lived, theologians and clergy abound who accept the Bible's communitarian social framework as normative for political - economic analysis today.

(2) Evolution has often been taught with the implication that it was a rejection of the biblical creation account, by ignoring or dismissing the creation stories as prescientific myths surpassed by superior modern versions.

While cosmology may mean several different things, the theologian's contribution is concerned with «accounts of the world as God's creation,» and, within that broad compass, one specific enterprise especially needed in our time involves «imaginative perceptions of how the world seems am where we stand in it» (Tracy and Lash, vii) 5 In other words.

Strangely, this second account of creation is also abstract, but not as vague.

This first creation account, known as the Priestly, or «P» account, was written during the Babylonian captivity.

«The term can refer to theological accounts of the world as God's creation; or to philosophical reflection on the categories of space and time; or to observational and theoretical study of the structure and evolution of the physical universe; or, finally, to «world views»: unified imaginative perceptions of how the world seems and where we stand in it» (Tracy and Lash, vii).

It provides a framework that enables us to give an account of both the Big Bang and evolution as integral parts of God's one providential plan for his creation.

For this reason, some Lutheran theologians prefer to speak of «orders of preservation,» taking into account what God is doing to sustain the world under the conditions of sin, even using means sin - laden themselves, such as war and capital punishment, to fight against still more serious attacks on the goodness of God's creation.

Not only does the completion of creation in six days correlate with and support the religious calendar and Sabbath observance (if the Hebrews had had a five - day work week, the account would have read differently), but also the seventh day of rest employs to the full the symbolic meaning of the number seven as wholeness, plenitude, completion.

And while it is true that history is seen as the context and vehicle of divine activity, it does not follow that the creation accounts are to be interpreted as history, or even prehistory.

Attempting to be loyal to the Bible by turning the creation accounts into a kind of science or history is like trying to be loyal to the teachings of Jesus by arguing that the parables are actual historical events, and only reliable and trustworthy when taken literally as such.

Together they form the account of an ancient, sacred dialogue a giant conversation initiated, inspired and guided by God with and among humanity about God, his creation and our role in it as his partners.

The symbolic function of creation in valuing time and history becomes clearer when the Genesis accounts are compared with myths whose purpose is to legitimate cyclical time (as in the Babylonian myth of the primeval conquest of Tiamat by Marduk, alluded to in Genesis 1:2), or to those in which time itself is a negative aspect of a fallen order (as in Plato's myth of the fall of the soul, or similar myths favored by Hindu and Buddhist mysticism).

Origen, however, is part of the debate, for he warns against reading the creation account in Genesis as a scientific description of the world's beginnings.

Which is why Thomas argued for a supernatural self - revelation of God that corrected reason's errors and gave it a more complete and intellectually satisfying account of the world as God's creation.

As usual, this neither proves nor disproves God, but it is one idea from Science that happens to mesh with the Abrahamic account of creation.

These «absurdities» (as Origen labeled them) were unsubtle hints from God that he wanted the account of creation read in an altogether different way, not as history but as truth «in the semblance of history.»

But in fact, intelligent design is mainly advocated in America by conservative Christians, who regard the account of creation in the opening chapters of Genesis as a scientific description of the origin of the world.

Likewise, wrestle as we may with the problem of evil, the heart of the matter is found in the great refrain of this Genesis story after the account of each «day» of creation, which says, «And God saw that it was good.»

The revealed account of creation mentions only the «dust of the earth» as material cause; there is no certain scientific doctrine to the contrary; therefore there is no reason to abandon a «literal» interpretation of Genesis, all the more so as the history of the theory of evolution shows that this tends to be regarded in a radically materialistic way as a complete explanation of man's origin, and so involves theses which are certainly heretical.

To put the matter once again negatively, we can and indeed must of course affirm that what is contained in the account of creation as a proposition actually affirmed, is true, because God has revealed that content.

The account of the creation of Adam and Eve seemed to affirm such a direct and exclusively creative intervention of God that in addition to God as efficient cause, only inorganic matter could have any place as material cause therein.

Here we can see that the Genesis story of creation, like the Revelation account of «the end», is to be taken as a way of saying that as all has proceeded ultimately from the divine Love, so all is in the end directed to the divine Love.

One clear positive element in the stem - cell debate for me was hearing the top researchers in biomedical science reinforce The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 343: «Man is the summit of the Creator's work, as the inspired account expresses by clearly distinguishing the creation of man from that of other creatures»).

In only a few short paragraphs, Alison provides a compelling account of analogy as God's way of subverting the human story of violence from within» analogy depends on God's refusal to be rejected by his creation.

It has affected how man understands the origin of life (including his own) on this planet, and Christianity has had to contend with, account for, and reconcile its implications with the biblical narrative of creation and purpose as stemming from God.

Pollak went home from this interview and wrote a detailed account he has used almost thirty years later as an introduction to The Creation of Dr. B.

These examples show that, just as the creation account of Genesis 1 should be read in light of other Ancient Near Eastern creation texts, so the New Testament writers should be read in light of Second Temple texts.

Isn't it possible that enuma elish is a corrupted account of creation and not merely a ficticious fairy tale on the same level as Cinderella?

What the biblical understanding of creation rules out is not any scientific account, but other interpretive statements, such as «God is nature» (pantheism), «the world is essentially unreal» (Hinduism), «matter is ultimate» (materialism), or «the world is evil» (Schopenhauer — and some forms of existentialism).

As we worked our way through Genesis 1 and the first creation account in Genesis, numerous people sent in questions about what they were learning.

As the Bible underlines, the Almighty is no species - egalitarian; the creation accounts bring man and woman into view as the summit of the visible creation, with everything else placed at their service, and in general, with lower things being placed at the service of higher ones (plants are given to animals for food, and later, after the flood, animals are given to men for foodAs the Bible underlines, the Almighty is no species - egalitarian; the creation accounts bring man and woman into view as the summit of the visible creation, with everything else placed at their service, and in general, with lower things being placed at the service of higher ones (plants are given to animals for food, and later, after the flood, animals are given to men for foodas the summit of the visible creation, with everything else placed at their service, and in general, with lower things being placed at the service of higher ones (plants are given to animals for food, and later, after the flood, animals are given to men for food).

We will see that just as with every other verse in the creation account, Moses is making a theological point that his Hebrew audience would have recognized and understood.

That is the meaning of the Holy Spirit overshadowing Mary at the Annunciation, just as the Holy Spirit hovered over the waters in the creation account in the book of Genesis.

The initial source of light in the Genesis account does not necessarily need to be our sun, as the light from our sun is brought up at a later point in the creation account.

Just as N. T. Wright wrote above that a rejection of the Q theory doesn't keep him from understanding the Gospels, the rejection of the JEDP hypothesis doesn't keep me from understanding the creation account or the rest of the Pentateuch.

We will be discussing the Apostle Paul's words about women later in the series, but it's worth noting here that when first - century rabbis like Jesus and Paul allude to the stories of the Torah, including the creation accounts, they are not participating in «straight exegesis» as we would understand it today.

Perhaps no text has been as revered, debated, discussed, and misunderstood as the creation accounts of Genesis 1 and 2 Regardless of how you interpret these stories, their effect on our culture and our psyche, particularly as they relate to our views of gender, can not be overstated.