Sentences with phrase «creation of the universe does»

Everyone wishes there was a sweet afterlife, but something like that doesn't just happen on it's own like creation of the universe does.

«The creation of this universe did not entail divine coercion.

Not exact matches

In other words, to believe that the laws of physics define the universe and its creation one must have the simultaneous belief that the laws of physics do not exist.

If you do Creationism you have to go through other faith's take on the creation of the universe as well and that wont give our kids the much needed brain power they need to get us out this funk!

So what was God doing all by itself for the ETERNITY that proceeded it's creation of the universe from nothing?

The Bible account of creation does not conflict with scientific conclusions about the age of the universe.

I do think that being an atheist in light of the complexity of creation (both on an infinite universe - sized level and on a microscopic atomic level) requires some amount of faith in something — even if it is faith in the ability of random pieces of matter to assemble themselves into something complicated.

first, i do agree that the creation of the universe from matter is completely explainable by science.

And the universe or comos or creation shall be 100 % free of and done with the curse of sin.

And even though this universe is meticulously designed, God having infinite power did not exhaust or deplete any of His power to create it nor to sustain it, and rather than losing or wasting anything, this creation adds to His glory.

Evolution tells us how we evolved from the first cell It does not tell us what caused that first cell that is called abiogenesis The creation of the universe has many working hypotheses but no one is sure at this time which one is correct or even if they will lead to the answer.

«It is foolish to dismiss the (series of Harry Potter books) wholesale based on ones that don't have a solid connection with (magic) that the creation of the (Harry Potter universe) does, by the way, but not the time frame which is often assumed).

Google Steven Hawking, he can explain (admitted I don't really understand it) why the laws of physics require the creation of the universe, no God required.

Some people don't like the notion of a universe forming from quantum foam, but, instead, would much rather imagine a god forming the universe, which is why we have thousands of creation myths, including the two biblical ones, the one written by the Priestly Source in Genesis 1 and the older creation myth written by the Jahwist in Genesis 2, which borrow from older Sumerian mythology.

Some people don't like the notion of a universe forming from quantum foam, but, instead, would much rather imagine a god forming the universe, which is why we have thousands of creation myths, including the two biblical ones, the one written by the Priestly Source in Genesis 1 and the older creation myth written by the Jahwist in Genesis 2, myths which borrow from older Sumerian mythology.

«The most ridiculous concept ever perpetrated by H.Sapiens is that the Lord God of Creation, Shaper and Ruler of the Universes, wants the sacharrine adoration of his creations, that he can be persuaded by their prayers, and becomes petulant if he does not recieve this flattery.

Believers make the claim of a god — the only evidence being the respective creation myth; our god is so great he created the universe and this is how he did it.

On the road to a bolder comprehension of the universe the children of this world day by day outdistance the masters of Israel; but do you, Lord Jesus, «in whom all things subsist», show yourself to those who love you as the higher Soul and the physical centre of your creation.

What do you think about the creation and preservation of the universe and life?

I think that it is absolutely laughably retarded to imagine that any sort of being who was involved with the creation of the universe would care one slightest bit where some mammal does with his reproductive parts.

Thus sayeth he, who, from up on high in his mightiest of almighty lairs did he speak to all creation and, being in that creation, did he thus speak to himself and where ever he thus spoketh to himself did he exhault himself and all creation and all the universe for, he being the great and most holy being, the word, all that he sayeth was truly.

While all evidence, logic and reasoning point to a Creator and absolute truth, you prefer to hide behind relativism and a theory of evolution which does not, in fact, describe the creation of the universe at all, or why concepts of good and evil or morality exist.

I'm not sure why it took me so long to notice this, but NONE of this has anything to do with religion, God, or even the «creation» of the universe.

Since you mentioned it, I'm glad to point that the Big Bang is just a way to dodge the facts and logic conclusions made by Edwin Hubble in his Observational Approach to Cosmology, pointing that Earth was in a privileged position, in the center of universe, which obviously has to be done for a purpose, by whoever is responsible for the Creation.

Of course, if you just want to say «Goddidit» without any expectation of ever understanding how he possibly could have did it then why not give equal credence to the universe being conjured up my magical pixies, or any of the other, less popular, creation creation storieOf course, if you just want to say «Goddidit» without any expectation of ever understanding how he possibly could have did it then why not give equal credence to the universe being conjured up my magical pixies, or any of the other, less popular, creation creation storieof ever understanding how he possibly could have did it then why not give equal credence to the universe being conjured up my magical pixies, or any of the other, less popular, creation creation storieof the other, less popular, creation creation stories.

Because there is only one visible universe, and because that universe does not demonstrate a particular type of creator (see the countless creation myths across history and geography) there is no compulsion to believe in a god.

I am pretty certain a 35 year - old carpenter who lived in a remote desert 2,000 years ago, had nothing to do with the creation of the universe.

Classical theologians have repeatedly pointed out that creation ex nihilo does not necessarily involve a temporal beginning of the universe; though, of course, many of them believe that in fact there was such a beginning.

Unlike the Christian god that wouldn't ever change his mind or doctrine... except for cursing the world for eating an apple... except for telling Abraham to sacrifice his son, but then stopping him... and except for killing nearly all life on Earth and then because of the guilt says I'll never to do that ever again - in exactly that way... and except for deciding that 2 of himself (Father and Spirit) weren't enough any more, and creating / fathering / spiriting as Son... and except for forgiving all sin, when «In the beginning» he had cursed the universe for the eating of an apple, by having his creation torture and kill his only begotten Son... and except for having to repeat himself about the unchanging eternal rules, to Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Saul / Paul, Mohammed, Joseph Smith, Bahá «u «lláh, David Koresh, and a whole host of others... and except for... and except for...

If the atheist statement «there is no god» is re-phrased as «materialistic forces only are responsible for creation and the subsequent fuctioning of reality / the universe» then you in fact * do * have a lot of explaining to do.

I have been meaning to ask, if you do not beleive in the existance of God, how do you explain the creation of the universe?

Just because the universe formed without a discernable force to give credit to does not make it either accidental or purposeful, those words only matter when we assign them to events and in this case the creation of the universe is neither.

And in addition, you can't tell me definitively that the yellow, black, and white striped 1000 year old, and 100 foot tall polka dotted vampire lady in black stockings isn't alive and doesn't exist, speaking perfect English even though she has never visited our planet, on the dark side of the moon, and has never been seen by the golden crown of creation, god's highest achievement, man, who dwelleths at the very epi - center of the universe, surrounded on all four sides by the heavenly spheres and angels, and overseen by god in heaven bless her extensive gold threaded wardrobe.

It does, however, turn the eyes of theologians away from heaven and toward the earth; or, more accurately, it causes us to connect the starry heavens with the earth, as the «common» creation story claims, telling us that everything in the universe, including stars, dirt, robins, black holes, sunsets, plants and human beings, is the product of an enormous explosion billions of years ago.

But the Jewish belief in creation does not possess the character of a theory to explain the universe; instead, it is the expression of the consciousness that man in his whole existence in the world is dependent upon God.

In the Bible, the «Fatherhood of God» does not express the notion that God is the sire of the universe or man, but that he is the sovereign patriarch of the household — that is, of the whole creation.

Evolution does not cover the origin of the building blocks of life — the creation of, or «poof into existence» of, the universe.

Misconceptions like yours cause people to think that understanding evolution has anything to do with the creation of the universe, which it does not.

3) the five forces of the universe: these five governing forces are the contributing factors to the creation of anything in the universe due to these forces, anything that doesn't adhere to these laws of physics would violate said laws thus not be possible in a stable universe.

A very poor assumption on your part; two completely separate issues; and nowhere above did I say anything about creation nor order of the universe.

Scientists are trying to explain the creation of our universe, but do so from the position that before expanding it was a hot dense mass.

While Genesis contains wonderful insights into the relationship between God and the creation, it simply does not contain scientific ideas about the origin of the universe, the age of the earth or the development of life.

You admit science doesn't know the origins of the universe but whole heartily believe God isn't the force behind creation.

The creation stories in Genesis reflect something of this understanding, as does the Gospel of John when it refers to the «logos,» the divine Word which binds and directs the universe.

So, you're implying that Noah's flood was a natural event which God foreknew but which he didn't initiate supernaturally — apart from his creation of the universe?

Believe in God all you want, but science is showing that he wasn't necessary for the creation of the universe, so that does put the two at odds.

Church teaching does not have any opinion on the age of the universe - only that correct scientific observation of God's creation will be able to determine it.

If we don't have an answer to the origin of the universe, how can we presume to know the origin of creation?

«Freeing God from the burden of special acts of creation does not remove Him as the source of the things that make humanity special, and of the universe itself.

By doing a lot of math and watching carefully what goes on in particle accelerators, scientists believe they can look back to 10 - 43 seconds after the moment of creation, when the universe was still so small that you would have needed a microscope to find it.