Sentences with phrase «creation out of nothing»

I felt that Creation out of nothing has something in common with abstract painting, and I was also excited about a new translation of the Genesis story.

The resurrection of Christ is essentially a creation out of nothing and by it we know of the original creation.

Creation is not envisaged as creation out of nothing, but rather as the radical transformation of prior chaos by Yahweh.

He presupposes them just as they, for their efficacy in the world, presuppose him.64 In the fourth place, Whitehead envisions no beginning of the world, hence no first temporal creation out of nothing.65 In every moment there is given to God a world that has in part determined its own form and that is free to reject in part the new possibilities of ideal realization he offers it.

God's chief relation with the world was creation out of nothing and final judgment.

Whereas Maimonides affirmed creation out of nothing, in which God freely created a world that is not identical with him, for Spinoza, God's perfection rules out creation.

15:24 - 28), but we don't know much about this event, so it might be a completely new creation out of nothing (ex nihilo).

Bara carries a sense of «creation out of nothing» whereas asah has a sense of moulding out of pre-existing matter.

This puzzle is directly related to the problem many theologians have with Hartshorne on account of his explicit denial of the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo or «creation out of nothing.»

It would appear that, without a «creation out of nothing,» Hartshorne will continue to have great difficulty adequately allowing for God's transcendence of the world.

Creation out of nothing is first mentioned in the Apocrypha: 2 Macc.

Whatever theological orthodoxy may have to say about creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing), the Hebrew scriptures see it as bringing order out of chaos.

Probably the favored doctrine in western religious thought has been the idea of «creation out of nothing».

Whether this was creation out of nothing, or order out of chaos, God was explanatory of the existence of the world we know, and that world was understood to be fully real.

At an early point in its development, this sense of God as in total control expressed itself and was reinforced by the affirmation of creation out of nothing.

Some present the Big Bang as a creation out of nothing, but other interpretations are at least equally possible.

Certainly, the traditional phrase «creation out of nothing» seems to imply that the created world has a beginning in time.

This calls for creation out of nothing, for how was the matter there in the first place?

Not only creation out of nothing but omnipotence in general is absent from the Bible.

This view entails a complete dismantling of traditional Christian doctrine, including: creation out of nothing, the finite duration of history and nature, miracles as direct divine acts, and the final triumph of good over evil.

Additionally, creation does not imply an initial temporal creation out of nothing: «God is not before all creation, but with all creation» (PR 521).

Not exact matches

In a press release, MoMA says the tower will require almost no energy or carbon emissions during the creation process — «a building that grows out of nothing but earth and returns to nothing but earth.»

The heavy spending on social programs succeeded in providing a safety net to keep many people out of poverty, but it has done nothing to spur job creation.

you cant put your finger on it, cant smell it, or taste it, but your soul will rejoice, if you have one left... this is your connection to the world, to the universe... nothing else really matters at all... we see all of this creation, and we've got the math and science to figure out a tenth of it, but if we cant realize that it was put here ultimatly out of love, and saved by the love of ONE true God, then we are blind even to that tenth... God is great, and may he bless you athiest, muslim, christian, jew, gay, whatever... God is Love, but rest assure He is also our Judge, the Judge of our hearts, hope you get them right.

It is an adventurous work of theological speculation on creation «out of nothing,» the Church and her sacraments, and the meaning of eschatology, including an imaginatively orthodox (and Orthodox) treatment of whether all, including the evil angels, will at last be redeemed.

Paul is not entering into the debate about whether creation is out of nothing rather than out of some primordial mass.

Nor is creation an abrupt act of making the world out of nothing, as later Christians asserted.

The creation is always God's creation; and we do not honor him if we assume that he has let it get so completely out of hand that nothing of him is still to be found in it.

There he says, for example, that God's creation of the world out of nothing is already Gospel.

I am not inclined to that view; I tend to agree with N.T. Wright that the vision points to a moment when the new creation is made «not ex nihilo, but ex vetere, not out of nothing, but out of the old one, the existing one,» just as the resurrected body of Jesus is not a brand - new body but his old one glorified.

ii) That, the creation was brought about Out of nothing; God is not the material cause of the creation;

Creation from nothing, the origin of death among humans, the murder of Abel by Cain, a cataclysmic flood of judgement, the righteous judgement of Sodom and Gomorrah, the Mosaic origin of the Torah, manna from heaven, the reliability of Deuteronomy, the driving out of the Canaanites, Isaiah's authorship of the servant songs, and so on — it's almost as if Jesus and his followers went out of their way to validate all of the most awkward apologetic curveballs in the Old Testament just to make life difficult for post-Enlightenment Western interpreters.

Hence, he discards the classical Christian doctrine of God's creation of the world out of nothing and affirms instead that the world, just as God, never had a real beginning and will never have a final end.

If we wish to remain true to our assumptions, therefore, we have no choice but to postulate that there is going on everywhere and at all times a continual creation of matter, the appearance of atoms of hydrogen out of nothing.

The point of Israel's creation understanding was not that God had brought something out of nothing, but that in the face of chaos, with its power to destroy and render meaningless, God the Creator had brought order.

The doctrine of creation «out of nothing» is a way of symbolizing the experienced fact of real newness.

Why should that possibility be viewed as anything other than the makings for a creation, once again, out of nothing in total violation of what God anticipates ideally for the universe?

All the science that human knowledge has reached about the creation of the universe, heavens and Earth is nothing but a drop of water out of an oceans of knowledge that human science yet not has yet reached!!

It is sometimes said that Jesus said nothing about homosexuality (as if this cancels out all the other verses), but Jesus squarely condemned sexual immorality in general (Mark 7:20 - 23) and quotes the Genesis 2:24 verse in his teaching as an expression of his Father's will in creation (Matthew 19:5; Mark 10:7)

Creation is normally taken to mean that something comes to be out of nothing (ex nihilo).

In his summary of the main differences between the two positions, Hasker appropriately emphasizes the issue of creation out of (absolutely) nothing.

And all that creation is composed of can not be out of God, which would make God mutable, and it can not be out of other pre-existing components, which would set up an eternal co-existent with God.40 Therefore creation can only be comprehended as ex nihilo, «out of nothing.»

For product photography, you will usually want to focus solely on your creation, so using a shallow depth of field will be perfect, it will throw everything else out of focus, this way nothing distracts from your product.

Even if God is hypothesized as the creator of the laws of nature that caused the universe (or multiverse) to pop into existence out of nothing — if such laws are deterministic — then God had no choice in the creation of the universe and thus was not needed.

After being left on her own to support herself and her baby daughter, Mamá Imelda's creation of a successful business out of nothing, and a close - knit, loving family that respects her generations after she's gone, is downright heroic.

Its considerable satisfactions, though, come mainly from the way the story is told, which spells nothing out, and in fact is so reticent that the viewer is constantly drawn into the creation of meaning.

«During the investigation and the creation of the characters, he's creating the raw material out of nothing, like alchemy, and what he's creating is starting to dictate to him what it's going to be about.»

The villagers preferred the familiar smell out of the east, an aromatic reminder of horses that had endured ever since the armies of their ancestors arrived a millennium before, bearing nothing but weapons - no art, no skills that weren't martial and only a single maniacal idea: that battle, not building; destruction, not creation, was man's fate and final legacy.

[1] Claiming that this privileged space had become nothing more than an «ossified custom» — a «commercial depot» for curators and dealers to ship works out into the world (and thus detach the artwork from the conditions of production and site of creation)-- Buren stated that artists could only resist the domestication of their work by preserving it within their studios forever (like Constantin Brancusi) or abandoning the four walls of the studio altogether for a life of art making away from institutional repression and commodification.

And then out of nothing the void is punctured and orders are formed around the developing architecture of creation.