Sentences with phrase «creation side of»

Whilst planning is vital, it's great to see just what others can come up with and with countless possibilities available in the creation side of things, it makes for some rather unique sights on the battlefield.

Whilst planning is vital, it's great to see just what others can come up with and with countless possibilities available in the creation side of things,

The comment you type in this boA very boring and has very little to do with the Creation side of things.

There is more emphasis on the sales and tracking than the presentation creation side of the software.

Not exact matches

Anytime the word is mentioned, it's an indicator of a departure from the content creation mode, something that many people are more comfortable with than the numbers - side of the strategy.

Before Kid President, Brad made all sorts of videos as a side hobby, and nobody seemed to care much for his creations.

He should step to one side and allow the creation of a government of change,» said Luigi Di Maio, the leader of the anti-establishment 5 - Star that won the most votes at the March 4 ballot.

The program, which allowed employees to spend one day a week on creative side projects, led to the creation of signature Google products like Gmail and AdSense.

Better still for Nevada, the two sides seemed to have reached agreement on the crucial provisions: a generous 20 - year package of 100 % tax abatements, conditioned on specific levels of investment and job creation.

You may be an expert on the creative side, but without the business chops to monetize your creation, it can peter out before it ever sees the light of day.

However, governments on both sides of the table must first recognize the benefits of strong startup ecosystems, such as job creation, knowledge transfer etc..

From Big Bang to Big Mystery: Human Origins in the Light of Creation and Evolution by Brendan Purcell New City Press, 370 pages, $ 34.95 Benjamin Disraeli famously asked whether man is «an ape or an angel» and answered that he himself stood «on the side of the angels.»

But on the spiritual side, he is always quitting something in pursuit of becoming a «new creation» — snipping out parts of life that have stopped being necessary ways of loving people.

A significant feature of this period was the rise of the Urdu language and the creation of Urdu literature which took its place side by side with Persian literature.

My point here is not to take sides with any of these speculations, but only to indicate that the initial insistence on locating humanity fully within nature, heightens the marvel of creation that is too often lost when we stay within our dualistic compartments.

Whatever relationships exist between God and what God creates are only on the side of the creation and in no fashion integral to God's own divine existence.

If the God of life is seen in every child of his creation, there can be no distinction between those who fight on our side in a conflict and those who fight against us.

Also, I think it reinforces the notion that one must choose between believing in evolution and believing in a loving, personal God - a common myth on both sides of the creation / evolution debate.What do you think?

The beach is nice because you can park on a side street, walk around in the sand and have great conversation all in the midst of God's creation.

Please get on the right side of Creation.

Physics - lite @ CN77 & Andrew Andrew's Quote «It's not all that pointless, see while you would never be convinced that your bronze age mythological beliefs about the creation of the universe are wrong, since I can rebut (with peer reviewed journal articles no less) any claim you make, in rather stunning detail, those who are not so well versed on the subject who read the dialogue could be swayed to the side of science.

If I may use a simile, responding to the call of God, the call of creation, is like walking up a narrow mountain ridge which drops off steeply on either side.

On the theoretical side, divine love was regarded as the sole reason for the creation of the world.

We must continually look again at our presuppositions and intellectual commitments as new scientific findings or theological insights emerge — not to reject one side or the other, but to gain a better understanding and appreciation of creation and the role of humanity in it.

This is one side of the picture; in its theological aspect it emphasizes the absolute authority of God over His creation, and in its ethical aspect suggests a deterministic theory of man's actions.

The other side argues that a female in today's «liberated» society is still a «woman» and as such should fit into God's ordained and orderly creation, fulfilling her role of submission and dependence in church and family without impatience on the one hand or servitude on the other.

And in addition, you can't tell me definitively that the yellow, black, and white striped 1000 year old, and 100 foot tall polka dotted vampire lady in black stockings isn't alive and doesn't exist, speaking perfect English even though she has never visited our planet, on the dark side of the moon, and has never been seen by the golden crown of creation, god's highest achievement, man, who dwelleths at the very epi - center of the universe, surrounded on all four sides by the heavenly spheres and angels, and overseen by god in heaven bless her extensive gold threaded wardrobe.

To summarize, to literalize the apocalyptic passages in the New Testament, is to run counter to all we know of astronomy and the world of space; they are tied in with the then - current Jewish eschatology and Persian dualism which saw evil in command of creation; as commonly accepted, they encourage passivity about the evils of the present world; they emphasize only one side of the message of Jesus to the exclusion of essential elements; they are grounded at least in part on a misconstruction of biblical poetry and drama.

This site seems to support old earth creation, but they have good info on all sides of the issue.

Even worse, we are seeing the creation of a hardwired ethic of supply - side immorality to which the principle of consent will not be able to set meaningful boundaries.

The «in spite of,» which holds us ready for disappointment, is only the reverse, the dark side, of the joyous «how much more» by which freedom feels itself, knows itself, wills to conspire with the aspiration of the whole of creation for redemption.

Redemption must come on the other side of the rent in the creation, exposed by man's rejection of love.

The set of problems concerning the usual distinction between development of the body and creation of the soul of man must also be looked at from another quite different side.

To argue by inference from effect to Cause, from the passive object to the active Subject of change, from transitory, contingent being to a Being who is necessary and eternal, from nature's striving after perfection to a Perfection which is ultimate, from the order observable in creation to a creative Mind - all that (I shall be told) is to approach the great Riddle from one side, and that the most difficult.

Nicholas Berdyaev the Russian philosopher was most critical of the traditional Christian ethics which confined itself to the ethics of law and ethics of grace and ignored the ethics of creativity, while secular modernity to which Christian modernism succumbed, elevated the human vocation of creativity as supreme and as capable by itself of solving the problem of destructivity within it without the need of grace and even of law in the long run Anthropology got perverted on all sides by converting Creation into an order of static laws which are only to be obeyed and perfected by grace in Catholic thought and by getting validated for collective existence without criticism but to be rejected as totally irrelevant in the realm of existence in grace in Protestant thought.

It is marked on its negative side by the rejection not only of the symbols of the creation, the fall and the salvation of men, but also of the belief in human dependence and limitation, in human wickedness and frailty, in divine forgiveness through the suffering of the innocent.

So as I walked through the Creation Museum, I saw exhibit after exhibit that tried really hard to tell one side of the story, and to be honest they did a pretty fair job.

The religious right has consistantly been on the side of the distruction of God's creations, the Earth and humans by backing BIG OIL and the NRA.

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

Generis, that all sides of the creation / evolution debate should be considered?

The Church has always taught the importance of water in the Old Covenant — at Creation, at the flood, at the crossing of the Red Sea — and has also always seen a symbolising of baptism in the water that poured from Christ's side on Calvary: «O God whose son, baptised by John in the waters of the Jordan, was anointed with the Holy Spirit, and, as he hung upon the Cross, gave forth water from his side along with blood...» 8

(Though we need to note that while the Bible speaks consistently for justice and for siding with the poor it offers little that is unambiguous about policy and strategy for achieving it - another example of how God gives plenty of scope to us to participate in creation - redemption by using our imagination and initiative!)

women the force of creation men the force of destruction, two sides of the same coin a mans place is to serve his wife and all her needs.

Here's a few Mormon factoids (dem darn facts is really painful) 1) J. Smith was a convicted con - artist on numerous times (non-post Mormon cult creation) 2) He said God is 6» 2» living on the planet Kalob on the other side of the galaxy (at the time the extent of The Universe was believed to be the Milky Way Galaxy — and oh, how convienient it could not be proven otherwise at the time) 3) Science proved since E. Hubble there are billions of galaxies (did Smith's personal conversations with Jesus and God limit to a narrow Universe?)

That does not mean creation is evil; it does mean that a part of creation is inevitably evil and that there is, as Melville understood, a demonic side to God himself.

Dave soon found a quaint Santa Monica, California location near the beach to sell his new creation with mustard on the side and a tall glass of ice - cold lemonade.

The favorite cake of a previous lab member while I was in graduate school was coconut and while I did not look forward to making such a creation, it was for her birthday so I sucked it up and made a coconut cake complete with coconut syrup brushed on the layers, coconut frosting, and lots of shredded coconut on the top and sides.

Each battle featured a different set of ingredients for the creation of a protein entree, a side, and a dessert, all within an hour.

Close up the whole shebang with another slice of buttered bread and throw that beautiful creation into your pan on medium heat for a couple minutes on both sides to melt the cheese and then crank the heat up to medium high and cook it for another minute or two to brown it up all pretty and delicious.

Close it up with another slice of buttered bread and throw that beautiful creation into your pan on medium heat for a couple minutes on both sides to melt the cheese and then crank the heat up to medium high and cook it for another minute or two to brown it up all pretty and delicious.