Sentences with phrase «creationism into»

The American Astronomical Society deplores the attempt to force creationism into public schools and urges Congress, all state legislatures, local school boards and textbook publishers to resist such attempts.»

This tactic had some success easing intelligent design / creationism into American public - school science lessons.

@this lady, The whole debate is about this only — the Christians are trying to get a backdoor entry into public schools by incorporating Creationism into science textbooks!

Legislators try to bring creationism into science classes as «an alternative to evolution».

Ohhh, is that what you were doing in the Dove school district when Christians tried to force creationism into the public school science curricula?

Not exact matches

No wonder the country is descending into international laughing stock and jobs created through scientific innovation are steadily shifting offshore when even those charged with educating your children act as if creationism has any validity in the science classroom.

I think more effort and resources would be more effectively and more critically placed into keeping our government secular, keeping Creationism out of the science class, and religious fundamentalism away from interfering with women's reproductive choices — just to name a few priorities.

The point isn't to argue the merits of your unprovable diety, but whether our children should be confused into thinking creationism is science.

«He (Ham) believes it is fundamentally unfair of folks like Nye to push creationism further into the educational shadows and to deny what Ham sees as its scientific components.»

He believes it is fundamentally unfair of folks like Nye to push creationism further into the educational shadows and to deny what Ham sees as its scientific components.

I mean, I'm all for (creationism) in philosophy class, history of religion class, human psychology class,» but bring it into science class, and Nye gets upset.

If all the people in the US who believe in creationism were «raptured» into «heaven», the average IQ in our country would spike.

ID is a purposeful repackaging of Christian creationism in an attempt to disguise it as science so that they could slip it back into public science classrooms.

As far fetched as the I Dream of Jeannie method of blinking everybody into existence, which is basically Creationism?

When Muslims become 80 % of the population, try and push creationism and other myths into our science classes, force their god on our currency, take over our government as you Christians do then they'll be in the bulls eye.

I agree with Nye, it will take a few centuries, but the craziness of creationism will be turned into the same category as terracentric universe.

It does not help your cause when a biology student comes into your office to ask how young earth creationism can possibly explain the fossil record and your response to her is, «Who are you sleeping with?»

Although most mainstream scientists see it as Creationism by any other name, it is entirely possible that ID will soon find its way into school curricula.

When I run into people who believe in creationism, it gives me a hint to expect irrational behavior in other areas of life.

He was confident enough in his faith to not see how science could undo what was important in religion even though the Pope at the time tried to twist his ideas into a convoluted «proof» of Creationism which Lemaître resisted.

Ironically, the same children who were taught Creationism for the last 2000 years grew into the adults who brought forth Science to help explain God's creation...

If you want to have a scientific discussion of creationism look into some of the answers in genesis writings.

It is funny to me that the same people who say that they believe that the bible (and creationism) is God's word, and therefore true, are the same ones that deny the old testament when told that it also says that you can't wear clothes made of wool and linen together, or that Exodus says it is OK to sell a daughter into slavery, and so many other things, that those things don't matter.

He's saying that creationism isn't how the world came into being.

trying to assert «creationism» into Science curriculum.

On the Creationism side, one simply has to put their belief into that belief, that everything was created.

He's just covering all the bases, hedging his bets to fit into whatever the GOP morphs into next time... As it stands now, he can tap into «Evangelical», «Mormon», «Catholic», «Creationism», and / or «Rational Science» whichever looks like an advantage in 2016.

A theory is: an unproven hypothesis of how things work or came into being, in that frame of definition; creationism is a theory.

-- quote A theory is: an unproven hypothesis of how things work or came into being, in that frame of definition; creationism is a theory.

Today creationism has spread northward and mutated into the oxymoronic form of «creation science.»

Last year, Louisiana passed the Louisiana Science Education Act, a law that many scientists and educators said was a thinly veiled attempt to allow creationism and its variants into the science classroom.

He visits the big questions — nature versus nurture, free will — and makes forays into controversial territory including race, intelligence and creationism.

We agree with the findings of Judge William Overton that the Arkansas creationism law represents an unconstitutional intrusion of religion doctrine into the public schools, that «creation science» is not science, and that its advocates have followed the unscientific procedure of starting from a dogmatically held conclusion and looking only for evidence to support that conclusion.

Creation Science (creationism, to skeptics) realizes that The Scientific Mathematician has made our universe and has put His laws into place.

I'm not sure that having a rabid ex-evangelical firebrand (Kristin Wiig) join the fray was such a masterstroke — it brings the movie into evolution / creationism terrain that is too scabrous for its own good.

The Politico article cites anti-creationism crusader Zach Kopplin's research on the teaching of creationism in schools funded by vouchers — without citing his investigation into public charter schools doing the same.

As cataloged in the Public Schooling Battle Map, government schools have forced parents into conflict over issues like freedom of expression, religion, morality, creationism, evolution, multiculturalism, sexuality, and numerous other issues in hundreds of reported cases in recent years.

Labeling the Republicans» economic platform the «economic equivalent of creationism,» Roubini says a lack of bi-partisanism on fiscal issues could lead to a debt crisis and possibly send the U.S. into a Japanese - style bout of stagflation.

If you believe the (literally) «goat droppings» of denialist climate science liars, why don't you believe those who do the same regarding creationism and biology, or medicine and HIV denial, or any number of topics that fit into the set of antiscience?

His recent article branching out from climate science into a defense of creationism seemed to me to be a burning of the last bridge between him and the scientific mainstream.

If someone wants to get into creationism, it would be the same.

Well Nice to see that the conversation about Spenser gets diverted into questions of death threat emails, creationism, and other retarded topics..

Introducing the evolution / creationism / intelligent design controversy, however obliquely, into an already politicized discussion seems unnecessarily provocative.

I'm not too fond of conservative anti-science activism in other fields (Creationism and stem cell funding bans etc.) but this one they have stumbled into getting right: it's a huge fraud.

I especially appreciated his scathing criticism of Creationism, and have regarded him as a careful sceptic, so it was with some bemusement that I watched his commentary on climate change unfold over the years, even taking into account his vested interests.