Sentences with phrase «creationist claims»

When you are scientifically - minded and educated but not a specia - list in the domain (my case in both both paleontology and climatology), it is still extremely easy to see that creationist claims are a pile of junk.

(For more information see: Creationist Claims About the Reconstruction of the «Lucy» Pelvis)

Also, what population curve are you referring to that shows a correlation to the time creationists claim there was a world wide flood?

Thus, instead of pointing out that no ideology or world view automatically follows from scientific data and theory, but represents a leap to another level of discourse, the creationists invite scientists to draw the very conclusions that creationists claim to deplore.

While creationists claims is like finding a hydrogen atom among several universes worth of hydrogen atoms.

That's a sermon in the guise of self - validating creationist claim.

Not the 6,000 to 10,000 Creationists claim.

If results were random, as creationists claim the two would rarely agree.

Indeed, the Earth is about 750,000 times older than creationists claim.

My point here is not to particularly attack b4bigbang, it is to take this one pretty typical creationist claim and point out that it is an absolutely unsupportable falsehood, and that this is pretty typical of creationist arguments.

TheCapitalist Basically everything that creationists claim is a fault to evolution science is a lie.

If results were random, as creationists claim, the two independent results would rarely agree.

If you want to see the face of fear, put a mirror beside your computer and visit: http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html Every creationist claim is debunked there.

ID creationists claim that natural processes can not produce adaptational complexity without purposeful intelligent design, either in a chemical or a virtual system.

Although the above two skulls look quite similar, most creationists claim that the first one (ER 1470) is human, while the second (ER 1813) is classified as an ape by the few creationists who even mention it.

There is new data on KP 271, a 4 million year old fossil that creationists claim is human.

The creationists claim that evolution is «just a theory».

Are you really arguing that, because creationists claim they have been unreasonably treated, no other claim of unreasonable treatment anywhere in the world will be countenanced?

Not exact matches

The Bible does not support fundamentalists and creationists who claim that the creative days were literal 24 - hour days The Bible does not support fundamentalists and creationists who claim that the creative days were literal 24 - hour days.

This is the classic creationist shell game: Attack evolution for what it does not do (claim to explain the origins of things).

Creationists sometimes try to get around this by claiming that the information carried by living things lets them create order.

Funny how IDers don't claim to be creationists, yet both have the EXACT same language and interpretation of evolutionary theory verbatim, go to the same church, watch the same videos, use the same arguments, vote for the same leaders, listen to the same pastors, and quote the same scripture, etc...

@Chad — Many «atheists» won't answer believers for the same reason Professor Dawkins doesn't debate creationists... it's a waste of time and it lends implicit validity to their claims.

Creationists want to claim evolution can only work by gradulism and thus should have many half transformed species in between each current species.

Although the paper employs some materials from contemporary economics, they are used to buttress its theological contentions in the way that creationists use bits of science to support their claim that the Bible is a scientific textbook.

If Creationists are to claim they did, then they will need evidence greater than faith and an ambiguous holy book.

You feel insulted and «dehumanized» when creationists say that people were created in the image and likeness of God, but you have no problem with the evolutionist claim that we all evolved from slime by a cosmic accident.

«Contrary to claims by creationists, macro and microevolution describe fundamentally identical processes on different time scales.»

Since creationists now claim that their putative «magic seed» volume is diluted 10 ^ 150 + times by inflation, their claim is now revealed as the most insanely erroneus idea ever devised by man!

quackaddict: Yet, an atheist claims there is no creator, or possibility of a creator, even though they have no proof of such a claim, while also requiring the creationist to provide said proof.

How can an Atheist claim the universe was not created without proof, while also requiring the Creationist to prove this same concept?

Yet, an atheist claims there is no creator, or possibility of a creator, even though they have no proof of such a claim, while also requiring the creationist to provide said proof.

All I know is that most of the people who claim to know what the Bible says, be they athiests, creationists, evolutionists or whatever, have not actually read it.

Evolutionists make no claim for perpetual truth, though creationists often do (and then attack us falsely for a style of argument that they themselves favor).

I also noticed that you posted prototypical creationist lie 127.2 — stating that science claims humans evolved from apes.

I also love the fact that Christians will pump up their chests and claim they are over two billion strong and then claim that those catholics aren't real Christians, or another sect claiming that creationists are not true Christians, So how many true Scotsman / Christians are there when they seem to get great pleasure in stabbing each other in the back.

So why don't you choke on your own medicine because creationists are definitely preaching their beliefs as facts claiming that they know absolutely how the universe and life was formed.

We have creationists who can't even agree on which version of their myths to try to claim as true, some sure that the earth is old and some ridiculous enough to claim that it's less than 10,000 years old.

Rain, when you make a claim like «even science agrees that a Supreme being exist», and you are asked to back that up — posting a link to yet another inane fundiot creationist website doesn't cut it.

Snelling 1 criticised Dillow and other creationists for restricting Flood strata to Phanerozoic rocks (Cambrian and younger) and claimed that most Precambrian rocks are also Flood deposits:

It's ironic because you said that creationist have no evidence to support their claims but you mentioned organizations that find such evidence And again their point is that history and science will not contradict the Bible

Chad, do yourself the disfavor of continuing to argue the stupidity that you do that does more harm to your position and the position of creationists than it does to the theory of evolution that you claim to be against.

the very idea that these creationist can make the claims that they know and understand God's methods proves them to be arrogant fools.

Between the creationists» claims concerning human origins and those of neo-Darwinists, truth is more evenly divided than our nation realizes.

There seems to be a consensus among the evolutionary creationists that the intelligent design folks have not provided sufficient data to support their claims and are therefore not taken seriously by the scientific community.

YOU, and other Creationists are the ones who are saying, in effect, that 2 +2 = 3, and everyone else is wrong — with your claims about evolution and creation.

Indeed, their paranoid fascination with the fossil record (which includes, almost, surreally, a «creation museum» in Cleveland, Ohio where one can see biblical children playing with dinosaurs) Hell, American Indians, Australian Aboriginals, «true» Indians, Chinese, Mongols, Ja.panese, Sub-Saharan Africans and the Celts and other tribes of ancient Europe were speaking thousands of different languages thousands of years before the date creationist say the Tower of Babel occurred — and even well before the date they claim for the Garden of Eden!!!

Although I also have heard other creationists make this claim, no one else has responded either.

Indeed, American Indians, Australian Aboriginals, «true» Indians, Chinese, Mongols, Ja.panese, Sub-Saharan Africans and the Celts and other tribes of ancient Europe were speaking thousands of different languages thousands of years before the date creationist say the Tower of Babel occurred — and even well before the date they claim for the Garden of Eden.

If the answer is yes, then entropy changed before God instituted the Curse... Therefore, Creationists should refrain from claiming that entropy did not change before the Curse was implemented.»