Sentences with phrase «creationist just»

I think creationist just like the idea of god better than anything else, true or not.

You creationists just get more and more desperate, but you can't even put together a consistent theory with any support in evidence.

Alas, Rubio trying to appease the Creationists just tells me that we will have another GOP bashing in 2 and 4 years and then maybe they will start listening.

Not exact matches

Just because you are a creationist doesn't make you a Christian.

No, just over 40 % are young earth creationists, based on their infantile beliefs in the Easter Bunny, or some other fictional character.

That's just honest observational science either evolutionist or creationist can determine from the same data... or lack of / inaccurate as it may be.

The wording is just the creationists attempt to make their baseless hypothesis mainstream and scientific sounding, but make no mistake, there is NO science behind creationism... none.

He's just refuting the ridiculous assertions by some creationists to refute clear evidence of evolutionary theory, or suggest that the Earth is only 6,000 years old.

It would be just a smidgen harder to dismiss this creationist nonsense if you guys at least has the integrity to frame the argument properly.

That was just a construct of dishonest creationists, of which sadly there is an all - too - vocal abundance.

if you REALLY want to seize up the gears in a creationist's brain just point out that there's an incredibly simple way to reconcile Genesis with currently accepted scientific theory:

When it comes to the day to day workings of an engineer that builds stuff and solves problems a young earth creationist can do the scientific job just fine.

Gravity is just a theory, too, but I notice the creationists don't just float away.

There's a lot of gross misinformation, and outright propaganda put out there by creationists aimed at just reassuring the opponents, who they count on to take what they say on face value.

A selection of statements on this blog by young earth creationists in just the last few days: Nope..

I just love these young earth creationists, they see the huge amount of evolution evidence but are just too brain - washed to get away from the bible.

... i know your book says don't believe anything else before or after to protect its place in history, but just as you would read greek mythology and have incredulous thoughts about multigods ruling the earth water and the undergrounds, those who are not stuck on your wavelength, read your mythology and think how anyone in their right minds could ever fall for those idolatric stories... your belief in your creationist god is as unfathomable as an adult looking up the chimney and feeling the power of Santa Clause in them... does the power of Santa Clause compel you?

creationist try to be sneaky and call it «intelligent design», but it's really just christianity.

The difference is, Dawkins will look at the content and debunk it showing why he disagrees, not throw out names just because a person is a creationist.

If you transitioned from an anti - evolutionary / pro-intelligent design view to an evolutionary creationist view a few years ago,» why didn't you keep going and just embrace evolution and drop the theistic aspect?

Let's give Jason the opportunity to do that here — just as we have an atheist, a Muslim, a Mormon, an Orthodox Jew, a Quaker, a Mennonite, a humanitarian, an environmentalist, an evolutionary creationist, and so many more.

Those terms you use are just a smoke screen used by creationists.

Extremist creationists proclaim that, but that's just thier uninformed opinion or intepretation to fit their theology.

I just don't understand how you Creationists can ignore radiometric dating techniques and many other proven scientific theories.

Just look at their creepy creationist museum being opened in the bejebus belt, where it has human actually riding dinos.

Why do creationists fight the big bang theory when they are saying it was exactly the same thing, just using different words.

Now if we can just all be creationists, we can make America be just as scientifically advanced as Afganistan!

'' (not just a few) of the great scientists of the industrial revolution were creationists» This is completely irrelevant.

@Chris, «Despite what a non creationist believes, the creationist's views are just as valid.»

Yet history tells us that many (not just a few) of the great scientists of the industrial revolution were creationists.

So, I guess my point is that the scientific community and the people who follow them blindly are just as zealous as the creationist that do the same.

Just like gays can not help being gay, the creationists can not help believing blindly.

Despite what a non creationist believes, the creationist's views are just as valid.

Most of the creationist / ID web sites have quietly begun to ask their followers to stop using a whole set of arguments against evolution, including the «just a theory» argument, because they reveal the person's woeful ignorance of real science.

Creationists» beliefs about the origins of the Earth are often a narrow focus, based in large part on religious beliefs, and while they reject evolution as «just one theory,» they often embrace other fields of science and technology.

Isn't a bit just as zealous as a creationist that tells you creationism is fact, to force an absolutely unproven theory, with zero physical evidence as scientific fact, rather than a wild theory that many scientist desperately hold onto?

So, to creationists, to create the diversity and complexity of life over a huge period of time is just impossible.

And here's Vic, happily proving that he's either scientifically illiterate or that he's just another creationist trying to create conflict where none exists.

For me, I just look at Creationist scripture and Evolutionist theory and can not find enough to go to war over.

I'm sure the majority of us would be just a dimwitted as they were before understanding the fact of evolution, before Galileo's heliocentrism, as dimwitted as creationists are who exist in the vaccuum of their self - imposed ignorance.

It does not help things, either, that most members of Group 2 do not distinguish clearly between Groups 3 and 4, generally taking them both to be just as misguided as creationists are.

It isn't just ignorance of science that muddles creationists» minds.

Like Francisco J. Ayala, who is a renowned biologist and philosopher, a staunch defender of evolution, as well as a critic of creationism and ID, but since he is the 2010 Templeton Prize winner, they ridicule him just like they would ridicule any creationist freak.

Put yourself in the place of a creationist who has been silenced by that logic, and you may feel like a criminal defendant who has just been told that the law does not recognize so absurd a concept as «innocence.»

It is not just the particular things that creationists do that infuriate the Darwinists; the creationists» very existence is infuriating.

CREATIONISTS why is your timeline GOOFY??? Just wondering?????

Of course I just made that up much like the «science» used by Creationists in an attempt to discredit real science.

A creationist teaching children that they are sinners and must believe in the ridiculous literal definition of the bible is just plain scary.

Do you not see the irony in an ID / creationist dismissing as «just so stories,» scientific hypotheses based empirical physical evidence and on replicable, predictable and validated mechanisms?

I will tell you that the creationists are scientists and look at the creation theory from that view point just as the evolutionist scientists look at the evolution theory on their view point.