Creationists believe that God designed all life, and that's a somewhat religious idea.
More radical
creationists believe evolution shouldn't be taught at all because it undermines the notion of mankind being created in God's image.
Of course, but billions is a far cry from the mere thousands that
the creationists believe.
We may not be able to definitively determine that it's 13.5 billion years old, but we sure as hell can definitively determine that it's older than what young earth
creationists believe it is.
Not
all creationists believe the 24 hour rule.
Creationists believe all sorts of different, stupid sh!t.
Most
creationists believe in the account of the origins of the world as told in the Book of Genesis, the first book of the Bible.
But several thousand years ago (note this; it must have occurred well before 8000 years ago which
creationists believe was about the time that g - od created man), a very distant ancestor of hers m - ated with a N - eanderthal.
@Chris, «Despite what a non
creationist believes, the creationist's views are just as valid.»
Despite what a non
creationist believes, the creationist's views are just as valid.
If our trip to the moon isn't a blunt enough fact to get
creationists believing we have more advanced science now and therefore more accurate facts than nothing will convince them.
Did earth (like some fundamental
creationists believed and still believe) predate the cosmos, were earth and the cosmos created at the same time or came earth later?
Not exact matches
Hard for me to
believe a highly educated scientist being a
creationist advocate.
I find it hard to
believe that someone would found a
Creationist museum in hopes of raking in unlimited amounts of cash.
Creationists seem to
believe that God must be a magician because he / she is too stupid to have created the universe in a complicated way.
In
creationist eyes, that's a a good a reason as any to blindly
believe.
It is very similar to what evolutionists say about
creationists, they say they are blind to the truth... it works both ways for there is evidence of both, but you must choose what you will
believe, because ultimately you are responsible for whatever choice you make...
And before you judge me as some kind of religious
creationist nut, I
believe that God created things like evolution.
I'm sure that the consensus will eventually be overturned from lack of progress, but I don't see them ever giving up their god Copernicus as long as they wrongly
believe that this is an admission in the direction of the
creationist's position...
Theo I suppose if you are a
creationist you can make your self
believe in anything including the misrepresentations you have made in your comments in the past.
We don't
believe your
creationist delusion, haven't you noticed by now?
... i know your book says don't
believe anything else before or after to protect its place in history, but just as you would read greek mythology and have incredulous thoughts about multigods ruling the earth water and the undergrounds, those who are not stuck on your wavelength, read your mythology and think how anyone in their right minds could ever fall for those idolatric stories... your belief in your
creationist god is as unfathomable as an adult looking up the chimney and feeling the power of Santa Clause in them... does the power of Santa Clause compel you?
The first pits nearly the entire scientific community against
creationists, who
believe that they are upholding the veracity of Scripture by denying that evolution happened at all.
Yet, how did these «kinds» produce observable biodiversity in only ~ 4000 yrs, well, they won't state it as such, but
creationists require «hyper - evolution,» that is a rate of evolution far faster than evolutionists themselves
believe is possible.
This article implies that you can not
believe in atoms and the wonder of evolution without being atheist or non-Christian, which is simply not true (I feel more theistic in a biochem class than I do talking to close - minded «Christian»
creationist idiots, interestingly enough for the same reasons the author does).
Now lets look at the answer from the opposite side, the
creationists explanation for the universe is «Let There Be Light» in a mere 4 words you explain everything in the universe; if you want to
believe in that then be my guest but this is outright comical and absurd.
maxi, Yes atheists lack a reason to
believe in your sky - fairy and the
creationist pseudo-science that attempts to muddy the water about the real science that disproves the foundation of your religious texts.
Evolution and Creation Dear Fr Editor, Evangelical
Creationists, I
believe, can not accept the theory of evolution because it appears to conflict with Genesis 1.
As I've said many times before, I'm not particularly interested in converting young earth
creationists into evolutionary
creationists.I
believe that Christians should be able to fellowship together in love and unity regardless of their various positions on the interpretation of Genesis Being neither an Old Testament scholar nor a scientist, I'll leave that debate up to the experts.
An actual quote from a
creationist: «Despite evidence to the contrary, I am still a
creationist because I deeply
believe that the Bible is true.
Funny how
creationists adamantly refuse to accept that they evolved from something so almost human as monkey, but have absolutely no problem blindly
believing that they came from a mud dummy blown to life by a bearded old white guy.
There is no god,
creationists may as well deny gravity too, (and most do
believe they will ascend into a heaven after death.)
Creationist have trouble separating the big bang from evolution because they
believe that all creation occurred in one moment.
BTW — I know very few people who subscribe to the catholic tradition of Christianity that you so snarkily describe at the end of your comments who are
creationists and who
believe that the earth is only a few thousand years old.
Those who
believe these nonsensical ideas DO hold the rest back - be it in
creationist ideas about biology, or stem cell research, or limiting over-population via contraception, you name it.
I do all those things Nye
believes creationists are incapable of and I do them very well, thank you - and since I can function perfectly well in society with my beliefs intact, why do they really matter to Nye so much?
Creationists don't
believe in evolution but in order for their religion to survive, it has to evolve.
Just like gays can not help being gay, the
creationists can not help
believing blindly.
Despite evidence to the contrary, I am still a
creationist because I deeply
believe that the Bible is true.
I
believe there are many
creationists that also get wound up on some of the gaping holes in the evolutionist's theory that can't be explained.
creationists have trouble
believing that something could come from nothing and reasonably so, but therein, i
believe, lies the true beauty of existence.
I
believe that's why they hold on to the whole
Creationist idea.
I'd like to know how many
creationists also still
believe the sun revolves around the earth.
All of you
creationists who blindly
believe everything your religion tells you have no idea about the current world.
Of course you can
believe in an old universe and be a
creationist.
In which case, we can discard
creationists and others who
believe in the literal interpretation of the bible.
«I don't doubt that [
creationists] sincerely
believe that Genesis is true.
Mastropaolo belongs to the subset of
creationists known as Young Earth
creationists, who
believe that Earth and its inhabitants were created by God some several thousand years ago - an account of which is laid out in the book of Genesis, in the Bible's Old Testament.
It is you
creationist baffoons who think we
believe that.
As for Newton, as well as a
creationist, he also
believed in alchemy.