4 Mikel Arteta (Everton) Rangers and Everton fans alike will tell you that Arteta is a huge talent, but the modest Spaniard still doesn't get the credit
his creative midfield play deserves.
Wilshere has been injury prone but has been injury free for a good while now... Missing a friendly against holland is hardly a sign of medical catastrophe so this is a massive overreaction... Wilshere is by a very long way the best of the British stable at arsenal and on his day he is a top flight
creative midfield play maker... Don't take my word for it ask xavi arguably the best ever in that role... Since his return he has shown signs of his best but not over 90 mins... But wenger has played him all over the place does not no how to combine him with ozil and miki and surrounded him with utterly hapless players like Ramsey and xhaka... He needs a new manager to bring best out of him I hope at arsenal but if the fossil stays he should go...
Not exact matches
The duo will boost their
midfield defensively, allowing their more
creative teammates to
play with freedom.
Monreal in at CB provides an adept and semi
creative ball
playing presence in the defensive third which I think is important to keep us moving the ball fluidly and intelligently and also means opposition need to compensate for the possibility of Monreal clipping the ball over the top to Lacazette and cutting the
midfield out.
On the other hand,
playing 4 4 2 requires a very strong and skilled Defensive
midfielder (Gilberto type) and very
creative and fast wingers.
The same squad that unnecessarily
plays three,
creative and central
midfielders that sacrifice the width of the pitch and provide minimal defensive steel when possession is lost
The
creative midfielder is his country's all - time top goalscorer despite
playing from
midfield, but has had a tough time with the Red Devils, and can now look forward to a new start in North London.
The way they
played last time was still not flowing and brave enough, but I blame our supposedly
creative midfielders (Ozil and Wilshere) for that for not being able to control the tempo and the flow
we have great fire power with probably the 2nd best
creative attacking
midfield in the EPL now the problem is that if we get congested in every game just outside the oppositions box there is no way we can score goals with 15 to 18 players in and around you, we need to change the way we
play we can not
play the million passing the ball game outside the box, we have to draw out the opposition to half way to be able to get behind their deference
He is dangerous because he is
creative and a team player like Sanchez, due to the fact that he
played in
midfield area when he was younger.
a
creative mid to replace our aging cazorla and a hardtackling
midfield to break up
play like gueye would be ideal, now with Saed and one or two young talent signings we got a team that can challenge on all fronts next season minus the deadweight (Walcott, elneny, Wilshire, Gibbs, Perez, debuchy, Gabriel, Campbell, Ramsey if if we sign two
midfield players) COYG
Though Mata finished the last two campaigns as Chelsea's Player of the Year Mourinho initially preferred to use Eden Hazard and Oscar as his
creative midfield talents and when the former Valencia man has been used he has failed to hit the heights that saw him
play a pivotal role in the West London club's Champions League and Europa League successes.
We need attacking
midfielder, someone who
plays in the middle, attacking (not Xhaka — because he is not) not on the wing like Sanchez, Ozil but a
creative goddamn
midfielder!
Elneny will be a fallback for the adventurous and risky
plays of Arsenal's
creative midfielders.
Shevchenko was the best striker in Europe for two consecutive years at Milan, with
creative midfielders like Seadof, Pirlo, Kaka
playing behind him, before he moved to Chelsea and
played behind a goal scoring Lampard.
Ozil is surprisingly very committed, he is
playing as a hybrid
creative midfielder doing both santi role of getting the ball deep to organise
play and his usual
creative self.
In my opinion, Arsenal should
play with 3 -5-2, to make
creative midfielders like Ozil, Ramsey and Xhaka free to create chances.
There is a possibility that the Frenchman could do his usual trick of
playing one of our
creative midfielders out on the left and that would put Wilshere, Chamberlain, Ramsey and Cazorla in the frame.
You forget that Lukaku and Benteke have achieved admirable feats
playing in clubs like Aston Villa, West Brom, Everton who I find it very hard to remember names of players in their
midfield rather than Barkley, Barry and Fabian Delph while Giroud has had the luxury of players such as Cazorla, Ozil, Sanchez, Walcott, Ramsey for 3 seasons now who are an indisputable stronger
creative force compared to those other teams mentioned.
At Dortmund he
plays with an extremely dynamic and
creative midfield.
The Gunners have suffered without the
creative spark of Santi Cazorla dictating
play from the
midfield following his absence through injury, and the club have been on the lookout for a future replacement.
our problem is not the defense we cant just score goals with so many attempts we shoudl have scored 4 - 5 goals and win it by 5 - 2 without a
creative midfielder like Cazorla or Ramsey (when he
plays well) our attacking
play is very predictable maybe
playing Iwobi instead of Elneny or Coq is at least better But Wenger's biggest mistake was to
play Chambers instead of Bellerin Bellerin with his pace opens up the opponents.
Morata clearly rates his former colleague highly, however, and there certainly seems to be room for a
creative midfielder like Isco at Chelsea, particularly as Cesc Fabregas is ageing and has
played more this season due to the unconvincing form of Tiemoue Bakayoko and Danny Drinkwater in
midfield.
Because we're
playing too many
creative players at the same time, two or three every game instead of two wingers, one
creative player, one box to box and one defensive
midfielder as we should have.
Why not look for a
creative midfielder who can both
play the ball out from our own 3rd (like Santi once Ozil arrived) but also has the ability to
play further up the pitch.
Have 2 specialist wingers (Walcott and Sanchez, Sanchez can
play on both sides so you can
play Campbell or Ox on the other side), a
creative midfielder in the center (Ozil or Cazorla) and striker up front
Arsenal would have a defensive
midfielder in a 4 -1-3-2 or 4 -1-2-1-2 formation, allowing the
creative midfielders like Ozil, Sanchez and Wilshere to
play with higher risk.
Like the usual 3 -4-2-1, Sanchez and Iwobi acted as central attacking
midfielders behind Giroud, but Xhaka
played as a defensive midifielder, supported the
creative central
midfielders in front of him (Wilshere and Ozil).
I think having Coquelin could help Jack also the takes the majority of the defensive responsibility in
midfield allowing the more
creative players to just
play and that will benefit Jack.
A santi replacement is not just about
creative play but (1) having the discipline to
play in defensive
midfield and (2) ability to dribble out of tight spaces.
Even though he is not a defensive
midfielder, he is younger than N'Zonzi, has high work rate, is used to
play with Barcelona football level, can
play as a right wingback as well, more skillful, more
creative and has learned a lot from Messi.
i am thinking the same thing, i just do nt think hold up
play center striker style works as well as speed with a
creative midfield and ozil in the middle
Wenger doesn't seem to realize that he can't
play 7
creative midfielders at once.
IF Wenger
played to Ozils strengths with a PROPER DEFENCE AND HOLDING
MIDFIELD so that he that freedom to be creative in the midfield then we will see the best
MIDFIELD so that he that freedom to be
creative in the
midfield then we will see the best
midfield then we will see the best of Ozil.
The Spanish international is a defensive
midfielder capable of both breaking up
play and distributing the ball to aid the side's
creative players.
It looks like Arsenal is not looking for a
creative midfielder, a
play maker in the market.
Giroud might be OK but he doesn't allow us to
play to the strengths of our
creative midfielders IMO since he lacks the pace to go after brilliant passes
played in behind defenders.
We need a young keeper to eventually replace cech (donnuramma, lafont fom toulouse or butland if we can't get those two) we also must have a
creative midfield player to replace cazorla (naby Keita, rabiot) a hard tackler to break up the
play (idriss gueye, nzonzi) and a striker lacazette / aubameyang / belotti... keep him at all costs but if Sanchez leaves costa, dembele from Dortmund, or mpabbe but I don't think that he's feasible, not mahrez too lazy for me if Alexis is leaving I want a world class player to replace our superstar who runs everywhere and never stops fighting for the ball not a one season wonder who's gonna leave every two years for the African cup and never tracks back.
Calhanoglu is a
creative midfielder well capable of
playing inch - perfect through - balls and beautiful diagonals whilst also having great expertise over free - kicks.
How can he
play in front of arguably the most
creative midfield in the world and his best attribute (his hold - up
play) is helping them score?
If he does, Arsenal must get someone like him, not a simple goalpoacher, but a
creative attacking
midfielder that can dictate the
play, assist and score a lot of goals, which I think pretty rare these days.
Playing in the
creative midfield role, ahead of Mikel Arteta or Mathieu Flamini, Cazorla needs to be doing a lot more than what he, going by the stats, has done so far.
Gustavo's role is to break up
play and feed the more
creative sources in the team, something which has made the
midfielder a favourite of manager Luis Felipe Scolari.
As well as the attacking and
creative play, the performances of the central
midfielders in snuffing out any danger and controlling the game was very good but because of the nature of the match I had to pick one of the forward players for Man of the Match and Alexis Sanchez just got my nod ahead of the brilliant Alex Iwobi.
Considering the fact that Forsberg is a versatile player capable of
playing in
midfield, behind the striker and even on the flanks as he tends to do for Leipzig, he would be a great signing for Arsenal and add to the
creative threat of the Gunners» attack.
When he
plays most times we don't win cus of his style which has refused to change to suit other players, and stop using injuries as an excuse for his poor performances.Ramsey has been having injuries as well and each time even when he is out of form he tries to make clever passes and with him the
midfield is stable and
creative coupled with his contribution with goals but Wilshere?
In addition,, we need to stick with the four back so that we have that extra
midfielder instead of that extra defender.The 3 back makes us less
creative and does not suit our style of
play from what I've observed.
The 25 - year - old star can effectively
play as a defensive
midfielder and also as a
creative central
midfielder.
With Mesut Ozil occupying the central position in Arsenal's attack, Mkhitaryan is more likely to
play out wide, which he has frequently done in the past, while still helping Ozil in shouldering the
creative duties for the
midfield.
Carroll or whoever
plays lone striker is isolated, there is no width or penetration in attacking positions, there is little
creative influence with Lanzini wasted stranded out on the wing,
midfield players do not do enough to support the defence and passing decisions and execution are poor.