Sentences with phrase «creator deity»

Churches are devoted to various religions depending on the game, but usually profess the worship of a particular creator deity such as Rubiss, the Goddess, the Almighty, etc..

If the natural world is a machine, then there must be a Creator deity.

Most forms of Buddhism have supernatural beings — essentially deities — there just isn't a creator deity.

If you don't have a creator deity who you think is just going to come along and clean up the earth you have a greater responsibility in taking care of it.

There are too many fallacies and bad decisions that a creator deity would have made to put us into existence, and the rules with which to live by are absolutely insane in this day and age.

and has no responsibility to the planet or to other humans because only the creator deities wishes should be adhered to if the deity gets to decide some future fate.

Not exact matches

I would agree, however, with the underlying religious point, that too much God is painted as a deity of petty rules rather than the awesome Creator.

See, I was going to ask that, but I've grown rather tired of the whole «oh, my deity exists outside of space / time and is the uncreated creator (whatever the hell that means)».

Experimental evidence needs to be integrated into a broader philosophy of nature if one wishes to find (or to deny) the existence of a deity, but the deity so discovered would not yet be seen as the Creator.

The reason for not believing in a deity or a creator is that there is NO scientific, verifiable - through - experiment evidence that one exists.

We have the lowly at the bottom who have little except for their «faith», then you have the guys with a special link to their «deity», who preach to the lowly about all their «sins»... I wonder what's in it for the creator?

The very form of Christianity's original apocalyptic proclamation rests upon an expectation that the actualization of the Kingdom of God will make present not the almighty Creator, Lawgiver, and Judge, but rather a wholly new epiphany of the deity, an epiphany annihilating all that distance separating the creature from the Creator.

The trimurti or three main deities are Brahma, the creator; Vishnu, the preserver; and Shiva, the destroyer.

It's just you have a relationship with a Divine Creator Spirit Deity thing.

Therefore, there is no Creator (male deity).

Whereas Pagels discusses second - century theologians who offer alternatives to Augustine's problematic freedom, she ignores the great «heretic» Marcion, who finally concluded that the creator of a world in which there is so much evil is a deeply flawed deity, the very God from whom we must be redeemed.

Hence why i believe that, while there is a creator for the universe, there is no god or deity that governs us or gives us laws or judges us.

It means only that the creation reflects what is the basic character of God in the fullness of deity — the Creator is not denied by what goes on in creation, save when there is willful wrongdoing.

«a belief that denies and rejects the Preeminence of the One and Only Creator God» Right, we don't think that one, or Allah, or BAAL, or Cthulhu, or Elvis, or Apple ™ is a supreme deity, and so far we've been right.

Instead of identifying the account either with a theory or even with a metaphysical or cosmological principle, however, he identifies it with a deity, and not just a «god» but with God, an ultimate, intrinsically personal creator, sustainer and provider of the universe.

There is only ONE LORD, it is the human creates these different deities and associate them with The Creator and question is «why human do that?»

This list of «evidence» does not logically conclude with a designer / creator, let alone the Biblical deity.

He forthrightly describes Intelligent Design thought as depicting God as «closer to a super-engineer... than the personal and loving Creator that stands at the centre of Christian orthodoxy... a disinterested deity whose main function seems to be to leave enigmatic calling cards.»

I think what I have a problem with is this: it's fine if you believe in a deity, I have no bones about that, but there is no reason to elevate it to a posistion of «creator of everything».

All too naturally a religious Christianity has known the most awesome and terrifying form of the divine Creator and Judge, for a religious reversal of the Incarnation must resurrect the deity in the form of an absolutely majestic and sovereign power, a power that has now lost its ground in the kenotic movement of the divine process.

In order to rebut my claim that there is a big gap between the world as it is and the kind of world that a benevolent creator with traditional omnipotence would be expected to create, Hasker argues that there should be no gap between the kind of world the process deity wanted to create and the world it actually created.

In order not to suffer this personal loss of value, Hick's deity gives human beings genuine freedom — freedom vis - à - vis God, which I have called theological freedom (Evil 17)-- so that their love and trust for their creator, when it develops, will be authentic.

Delving deep into an obscure mysticism in which he blends religious beliefs of all colours into an all - encompassing deity that he calls the «creator» or «sustainer,» the prince bemoans that mankind at large — and scientists in particular — have lost a «sense of the sacred in our dealings with the natural world.»

I always admired Hindu theology because, you know, they had these three sorts of deities — a creator, a destroyer and a maintainer.

Do Not Worship a False Deity Genesis 2:16 states: «And the Lord God commanded the (man) Adam, saying...» This Divine command to Adam implies that only the One True God, the Creator, should be obeyed and honored as the Deity, and the greatest honor is to serve and worship Him.