But Keaton says that
crime lab scandals fall into two categories: those involving fraud or other egregious misconduct, which are few and far between but suggest a complete breakdown in the integrity of a lab; and those based on human error, which are far more common but much easier to identify and correct.
Meanwhile, the drumbeat of
crime lab scandals goes on.
Not exact matches
In an Ikea - sized warehouse turned de facto
crime lab last fall, professor Gregory Cizek got his first look at the Atlanta test papers that would beget an education
scandal of historic proportions.
Even the much vaunted FBI
crime lab, long considered the nation's premier forensic facility, has been rocked by
scandal: first in its explosives unit, then its DNA unit, then its comparative bullet - lead analysis unit, and most recently in its hair microscopy unit.
Such
scandals have been occurring with mind - numbing frequency since 1993, when the long - running fraud perpetrated by former West Virginia state police
crime lab serologist Fred Zain first came to light.
As bad as that
scandal was, it pales in comparison with one uncovered the year before at the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation's
crime lab.
But the ABA Journal counted dozens of
scandals of all shapes and sizes in both accredited and unaccredited
crime labs from one end of the country to the other in the last decade alone.