Not exact matches
Users of the social network are notoriously brutal, and alongside the outpourings of grief were
criticisms of Hoffman's drug use,
questions of why this story
got top news billing above far more worthy tragedies, and then, in increasing waves, attempts by people
to place themselves in the story.
by the way, I do have a better understanding of historical
criticism, I wasn't trying
to get out of answering your original
question!
With this
question, the self - critique of the historical method passes over
to a self -
criticism of historical reason, without which our analysis would
get stuck in superficialities.
Both Arsenal fans and the football press have been raising
questions about the prof and his future at the club and even though he has publicly dismissed the
criticism it must be having an effect and I think it is starting
to get to him.
Are you really naive enough
to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going
to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or
criticism to the infallible one... I dare you
to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as much as this man... it's the very reason why only one player I can think of has ever returned
to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying
to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came
to the backroom staff so they probably asked him
to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the only former players who haven't publicly
questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't
get in an airplane
The Wenger
criticism is tiring, when a manager can
get his team
to preform like that... how can you
question the work being done.
And the problem can
get particularly acute when it comes
to a teacher's
criticism of a student's work — an indispensable part of good teaching, but an experience that for many disadvantaged students is weighed down by
questions of trust: Is my teacher criticizing my work because he's trying
to help me improve or because he doesn't respect me?
So many
QUESTION MARKS!!!??? In the back of my mind I just know that this will open my blog up
to even more
criticism from mean people, but at the same time I just need
to get over it because this is the internet and there's just no way around it.
None of the studies ever really
got published, nor held up
to any
criticism when other scientists started asking
questions.
A polite enquiry or constructive
criticism will generally
get a reply, and once you've set up a friendly relationship you're in a good position
to ask
questions or apply for other dogs.
The
criticism question is one of those adversity pieces that you've always
got to have a story or two about in your back pocket for interviews.
They do not resile from their position, but there is still the
question of fairness that arises... that they have
to be put in a position where they can adequately acquit their responsibilities and where they can
get proper advice, proper systems in place, so that in the usual course of their dealings they are not going
to be placed unfairly in a vulnerable position and then unfairly cop
criticism from those many people unfortunately in our community who are very quick
to seize any opportunity
to criticise Aboriginal organisations and, indeed, Aboriginal individuals.