Two major
criticisms of standardized tests are that they are culturally biased and may not accurately reflect student learning.
Not exact matches
This year, Teacher Appreciation Week comes amid a daily drumbeat
of criticism of the recent grades 3 - 8 English - language - arts and math state
tests — and
of standardized testing in general.
In face
of this
criticism, Moskowitz has time and again cited the network's high performance on
standardized tests compared to traditional district schools.
At the crux
of NCLB are the
standardized tests that have become the target
of criticism and debate in education across the nation.
Adkins addresses several frequent
criticisms of the
test, including objections to using a corporate partner to score the assessments and concerns about the effort to
standardize the teaching profession.
In August, the Los Angeles Times was the subject
of intense
criticism and praise for its series that included value - added scores for individual teachers based on years
of standardized test data — a project that newspapers in New York City now want to replicate.
But it's also garnered lots
of criticism for its focus on
standardized test - scores and its system
of rating schools according to whether they make «adequate yearly progress.»
But the bill, supported by the powerful California Teachers Assn., attracted a firestorm
of criticism over the costs to financially strapped districts and the requirement to negotiate with unions every element
of evaluations, including the use
of state
standardized test scores.
State House lawmakers seemed to take up that
criticism when they approved their version
of the budget in May, ordering one
standardized test for voucher students in order to make academic comparisons.
There was
criticism for placing too much emphasis on
standardized tests at the expense
of «excellence in instruction, culture, climate and student's academic exploration.»
Much
of the
criticism of the Bush - era No Child Left Behind law was that its over reliance on
standardized assessments — and the subsequent pressure it put on teachers due to its punitive nature — encouraged educators to «teach to the
test» at the expense
of actual learning.
It was one
of several changes to the platform pertaining to
standardized tests and charter schools that have created a flurry
of recent discussion: sharp
criticism by some and cheers
of support by others.