All they can do is
criticize other beliefs.
Maybe your trying to look intelligent by
criticizing others beliefs, but you are no different than the same people who put down other beliefs or those with out one.
Not exact matches
LDS / Mormon is very different than a subset of Christianity (most Christians don't consider it Christianity at all), and therefore since it is not as well known as mainline Christianity (Catholic and Protestant),
criticizing particular details (hair - splitting) is still useful on educating
others on LDS
beliefs — even if done so in a negative way.
Can we just appreciate what this woman has written and acknowledge our own strengths and weaknesses without
criticizing the
belief choices of
others?
-- C. S. Lewis who went from atheist to Anglican felt that if the universe is just cause and effect, the unfolding of physical laws without creative or guiding actor, then nobody can
criticize someone else for any action or
belief, since all of it is inevitable and could not be any
other way given the initial conditions.
Posner even indicates some sympathy for those who want to prohibit those
other abortions: «I do not mean to
criticize anyone who believes, whether because of religious conviction, nonsectarian moral conviction, or simply a prudential
belief that upholding the sacredness of human life whatever the circumstances is necessary to prevent us from sliding into barbarism, that abortion is always wrong and perhaps particularly so in late pregnancy, since all methods of late - term abortion are gruesome....
People truly at peace with their
beliefs don't feel the need to gain validation from
others through
criticizing them or scorning them not do they feel the need to bark and howl from the highest tower to be heard.
Believe or don't believe, but stop
criticizing others for their
beliefs.
Besides, your reference to the «people in glass houses should not throw stones» would seem to imply that you would only let the «politically blameless»
criticize the political
beliefs of
others.
Why are you so critical of believers, and so defensive against them «forcing» their
beliefs on
others, when you are doing the PRECISE SAME THING YOU
CRITICIZE THEM FOR?
[2][3] In
other words, Godwin observed that, given enough time, in any online discussion — regardless of topic or scope — someone inevitably
criticizes some point made in the discussion by comparing it to
beliefs held by Hitler and the Nazis.
Who does Jeffress think he is to
criticize the
beliefs of
others when he is probably in the religion game for the money?
(It's tempting to ask scholars to
criticize others» mistakes, but we reasoned that it would be more productive to ask them to reflect on failures that challenged their own
beliefs — most of them did so.)
On the
other hand,
criticizing or making fun of another employee's
beliefs, or aggressive and unwelcome proselytizing, might be.