Sentences with phrase «critics argue»

Some critics argue SegWit trades immutable security for convenience.

Since there will be a higher cost to store data, critics argue that BCH will result in fewer, larger mining entities.

Some critics argue that Ripple only copies those aspects of the current fiat currency and fractional reserve - based financial system that cryptocurrency is meant to solve.

If only we could force everyone to use their real names, these critics argue, then discourse on the internet would become a virtual paradise of civility and camaraderie.

While Republicans posit that the sum $ 1.5 trillion in tax cuts for corporations and top earners will trickle down to middle - class workers, the bill's many vocal critics argue that cuts at the top will only further enhance the wealth of shareholders and executives.

Critics argue that comments are mostly noise and are a waste of time, but blogs that don't have them risk being seen as just a soap - box for their authors.

The OFT's disappointing record as a prosecutor of this offence is not primarily, as the critics argue, the fault of its low quality and resource - starved investigators.

The tie - up with the London Stock Exchange would create a $ 7 billion transatlantic exchange doing $ 4 trillion in annual trading, but critics argue that Canada could lose control of its capital markets to a British holding company as a result of the deal.

While these pieces of legislation have been well - intentioned and contain some appropriate remedies, critics argue that they take an overly broad approach that negatively affects legitimate patent holders, especially small companies.

LSUC benchers voted in April 2014 not to accredit the law school proposed by TWU, a British Columbia - based evangelical Christian university, because of its community covenant that asks students to refrain from «sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of marriage between a man and a woman,» a stipulation critics argue is discriminatory against LGBTQ individuals.

Finally, some critics argue that the single greatest challenge facing the CCRC is a lack of adequate funding and resources.

While critics argue

While critics argue that you'll find paperless offices when you find paperless restrooms, the misnomer hasn't prevented people from reducing the amount of paper they use, nor from sharing their experiences and lessons learned along the way.

(Critics argue that Google's role is more involved and complex, that the search engine's secret algorithmic rankings, selecting some results instead of others, amounts to curation.)

At issue is the Christian university's community covenant that asks the students to refrain from «sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of marriage between a man and a woman,» a stipulation critics argue is discriminatory against LGBTQ individuals.

The covenant asks students to refrain from «sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of marriage between a man and a woman,» a stipulation critics argue is discriminatory against LGBTQ individuals.

Their track record is mixed, and critics argue that the standards they set are «low and ambiguous», not binding, and that market transformation becomes too industry - friendly or, in the case of Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil, are not even worthy of being called «sustainable» as they do not effectively protect secondary areas and peat swamps from the risk of deforestation.

Although the plant is slated to use GreenPower, critics argue such renewal energy should be used for reducing emissions, not offsetting unwarranted new infrastructure.

Critics argue as follows.

Critics argue the oil companies should face absolute caps on their emissions, but Mr. Coutu said such an approach would stifle growth in Canada's most important resource development.

Some critics argue that future warming may even dry out he upper atmosphere, tempering the warming effect of water vapor.

Critics argue that they have also been suppressing the true implications of global warming, somewhat as the tobacco industry did about the dangers of cigarettes.

While NAS experts attempt to downplay the political advocacies of its analysis, some critics argue that its explicit intent is to institute a burdensome carbon tax on businesses and individual taxpayers.

Burning renewable fuels, such as ethanol, can reduce air pollutant emissions, but critics argue that gasoline blended with too much ethanol can interfere with emissions control systems in some automobiles and actually lead to higher emissions.

Critics argue that an unregulated market runs the risk of monopolies gouging consumers when energy is in high demand, and point to the struggles states such as California have had implementing deregulation.

The existence of such gaps, the critics argue, implies the climate models themselves are too flawed to be relied on.

Critics argue that accounting for carbon recycling is far more complex than it seems.

Critics argue such an exercise would be superfluous given the conventional review processes,»

Critics argue that really only the «cap» portion of the SO2 program was the part that worked.

Critics argue, for example, that a wind turbine farm can only operate at a «capacity factor» (a ratio that measures the potential output of an energy source against its actual output) of 30 to 35 percent, while a nuclear reactor operates at around 90 percent.

Critics argue that «clean coal» means anything the industry wants it to, pointing out that of the country's 616 coal plants, none are carbon - free or close to it.

However, critics argue that local and indigenous communities currently don't have a voice at the negotiations table, and thus their needs are not being heard.

Critics argue that the appalling level of most dental work in Britain is due to a system that rewards poor work; an almost complete lack of quality checking and the near impossibility of having dentists disciplined or struck off.

Critics argue that this is based on the assumption that suffering is inherently bad.

OK, so let's agree temperatures are rising, though I've heard critics argue that the data supporting that may be flawed.

Critics argue that if a tuition policy is implemented, then some students will simply attend the school because they can pay and not because they have the competency or even desire to do so.

Although some critics argue that Mr. Krens has in effect turned the Guggenheim into a McDonald's - like franchise at the expense of expanding its collections and endowment, he has actually created a model for expansion that is being copied by institutions around the world, including the Tate in Britain and the Louvre in France.

[4] Some critics argue much of the current «postmodern» art, the latest avant - gardism, should still classify as modern art.

Some of my favorite critics argue that art must struggle fiercely against the past.

The new rules are better for people who can afford to pay for first or business class tickets, but critics argue they penalize people who find good deals on shorter flights.

Critics argue this has left the city with the sort of overcrowding challenges faced by tourist hotspots such as Venice and the Vatican.

It does provide some vitamins and antioxidants (vitamin C, beta - carotene, and lycopene) but some critics argue that tomato pomace is just a filler in dog foods.

Some critics argue that the tactic fails to significantly decrease the number of stray cats, in part because many owners do not neuter their pets and then have nowhere to house kittens, leading to more cats on the street.

Critics argue yeast ingredients can be linked to allergies and can increase the risk of developing the condition known as bloat.

Critics argue that banning any one specific breed is misguided; they say it's the dog, not the lineage, that matters.

Additionally critics argue that canola oil has a high content of the known toxin, erucic acid, but there is little solid evidence to confirm or deny the danger associated to this toxin.

Critics argue that some dogs are not able digest peas properly, however if your dog has not a problem digesting peas you should not be worried about this ingredient.

Critics argue that its high content of the known toxin, erucic acid may be a cause for concern.

Critics argue yeast ingredients can be linked to allergies and bloat.

The bill's critics argue that these practices are themselves significant contributors to the growth of consumer bankruptcies.