The film has received mixed reviews, with
some critics saying the plot has all the research and material, but lacks passion and vitality.
Not exact matches
What
critics said: «Frantic action, tinny dialogue, perfunctory characterization and tried - and - false
plot pilferings.»
Even the screenwriters get blasted in most of the reviews posted online, similarly to TheWrap's film
critic Andy Klein «s review, who
said «the four credited screenwriters — the returning Creighton Rothenberger & Katrin Benedikt, plus Christian Gudegast («A Man Apart») and Chad St. John — make things move fast enough to keep you awake, but not fast enough to finesse its
plot absurdities past an alert viewer's mind.»
There's a lot of bad
critics that tell you the
plot of a film and just
say it's shit or awesome.
The premise and
plot has certainly resonated with
critics, but also by Sarah Silverman who
said that the book was «amazing.
«
Critics are already saying that 20 % is too fickle...» The same critics (AIGN for example) have long been saying that climate change is a communis
Critics are already
saying that 20 % is too fickle...» The same
critics (AIGN for example) have long been saying that climate change is a communis
critics (AIGN for example) have long been
saying that climate change is a communist
plot.