It is a shame that Daniel T. Willingham is unable to link empathy and imagination with his commitment to the science of psychometrics in his stinging
critique of multiple intelligences theory («Reframing the Mind,» Check The Facts, Summer 2004).
Not exact matches
He is best known in educational circles for his theory
of multiple intelligences, a
critique of the notion that there exists but a single human
intelligence that can be assessed by standard psychometric instruments.
The author
of thirty books translated into thirty - two languages, and several hundred articles, Gardner is best known in educational circles for his theory
of multiple intelligences, a
critique of the notion that there exists but a single human
intelligence that can be assessed by standard psychometric instruments (please see multipleintelligencesoasis.org).
Daniel Willingham's
critique of Howard Gardner's theory
of multiple intelligences («Reframing the Mind,» Check the Facts, Summer 2004) is yet another attempt by a psychometric supremacist to quash other views
of intelligence.
As well as responding to some
of the
critiques of the theory, he offers practical guidance on its educational uses in schools and museums and speculates about the relationship between
multiple intelligences and the future world
of work.
The author
of 30 books translated into 32 languages, Gardner is best known in educational circles for his theory
of multiple intelligences, a
critique of the notion that there exists but a single human
intelligence that can be adequately assessed by standard psychometric instruments.
The author
of twenty - nine books translated into thirty - two languages, and several hundred articles, Gardner is best known in educational circles for his theory
of multiple intelligences, a
critique of the notion that there exists but a single human
intelligence that can be assessed by standard psychometric instruments.